| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states that while he was wounded on 18 August 1969 in Vietnam, the combat situation at the time prevented his wound from being properly recorded.
4. In support of his application he submits a statement from a retired master sergeant who says he was atop a bunker with the applicant when a mortar round hit a roll of concertina wire in front of the bunker. The applicant was struck by a piece of shrapnel in his neck. A medic was called who removed a piece of shrapnel from the applicant’s neck and bandaged the wound.
5. Also submitted in support of his application is an after-action report from his former command in Vietnam.
6. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 February 1969, was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of indirect fire crewman, and was promoted to pay grade E-3. On 10 October 1969, while in Vietnam, the applicant reenlisted to be a helicopter repairman. He was promoted to pay grade E-4 and was honorably released from active duty on 18 April 1972. Other than his awards for being in Vietnam, his only award or decoration was the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
7. The applicant’s DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, item 40, Wounds, has no entries. However, this form shows that the applicant was credited with serving in Vietnam during the following campaigns: Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969, Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970, Sanctuary Counteroffensive, and Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. This regulation also specifies that when a soldier is awarded a service medal, he or she is given a bronze service star for each campaign that was fought while the soldier was assigned to the country or area designated for the service medal.
9. This regulation also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. A record of punishment is not automatically disqualifying. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.
10. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the applicant has submitted a statement indicating that he sustained a wound in action, as he himself notes, there is no evidence or indication that his treatment was made a matter of official record.
2. While the Board has no reason to doubt the statement of events regarding his wounding, such individual statements are acceptable only where corroborating evidence is available from official sources. In the absence of evidence showing that he was wounded as a result of hostile action, there are no grounds for this Board to award the Purple Heart.
3. However, the applicant served in four campaigns in Vietnam and should have four bronze service stars added to his Vietnam Service Medal. Likewise, he should be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
4. In addition, the applicant’s military record is unblemished with any disciplinary action or any indication that his service was anything but meritorious. Therefore, the Board must conclude that the Good Conduct Medal should have been awarded to the applicant, but for some reason it was overlooked.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. Adding four bronze service stars to his Vietnam Service Medal;
b. Awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period from 5 February 1969 through 4 February 1972; and
c. Awarding him the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__jtm____ ___cla__ ___rvo___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__________Raymond V. O'Connor__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001062296 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020228 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076212C070215
This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for actions on 19-20 June 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020338
The available evidence shows the applicant served honorably from 9 August 1967 to 9 June 1969 and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 5...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000172
His service medical record shows that he did have a fragment removed from his right shoulder on 25 February 1970. The record of medical treatment showing he had a piece of shrapnel removed from his shoulder, as corroborated by contemporaneous letters he sent to his wife explaining the enemy origin of the wound, is accepted as sufficient evidence to show he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016788
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2d Battalion, 320th Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 18 March 1968 through 2 May 1970 by DAGO Number 48, dated 1971. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 321st Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006625
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained a fragment wound to his left bicep in Vietnam on 19 August 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015464
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * two Overseas Service Bars * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge [no weapon specified] 3. Evidence shows the applicant received two awards of the Army Commendation Medal, of which one was with the "V" Device. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016566
The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the awards of the ARCOM; Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 23 May 1968 to 22 May 1970; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; Republic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013986
Although the applicant was wounded by a piece of shrapnel while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows that the applicant was wounded as the result of a hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024378
Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. As such, there appears to be sufficient evidence to show he was wounded in action in Vietnam on or around 8 November 1968 which would entitle him to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074888C070403
In addition to supporting an award of the Purple Heart, his former unit commander also notes that several other awards (unit and campaign stars) were omitted from the applicant's records. Although the applicant's Bronze Star Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge and Air Medal were all reflected on his separation document, the Army Commendation Medal was not. The Board also notes that the applicant's award of the Army Commendation Medal was omitted from his separation document.