Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062287C070421
Original file (2001062287C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 1 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062287

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he was selected for promotion to captain while he was in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR).

APPLICANT STATES: That he was never notified that he was being considered by a promotion selection board. He transferred to the Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) in 1998 and found out that he should have been discharged in 1996 but was never informed. He provides a letter from the MAARNG, in which the Director of Personnel informed him that the MAARNG could not help him as the correction concerned his service prior to his appointment in the ARNG, as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 20 May 1989. He was promoted to first lieutenant in the USAR on 23 May 1992.

The applicant was first considered for promotion to captain by the 1995 promotion selection board. By letter dated 1 March 1996, the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) informed him that he had been considered for promotion to captain but not selected.

The applicant was next considered for promotion to captain by the 1996 promotion selection board. By letter dated 7 May 1998, PERSCOM informed him
that he had been considered for promotion to captain but not selected and as a result of his second failure to be selected he must be discharged. His discharge orders are not available. (PERSCOM, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components has stated that the 1996 board took 18 months to get approved.)

Department of the Army Pamphlet 600-3 is intended as a professional development guide for individual officers. In pertinent part, it states that officers in many respects are ultimately their own career managers. The key is to be involved in career development by making informed logical decisions and acting on them. One important element of an officer’s involvement is the accurate reflection of capabilities in the official military personnel file (OMPF) maintained by Headquarters, Department of the Army. The OMPF contains the data from which important career development decisions are made for selection, advancement, assignment and retention. Officers should review, update and maintain these records throughout their careers.

Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy for the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the Army National Guard and the USAR. Paragraph 2-1 states that a first lieutenant is eligible for promotion to captain upon completion of 6 years of commissioned service. Paragraph 3-4 states that the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components will notify each USAR officer in the zone of consideration by a mandatory selection board. This notice will be dispatched at least 30 days before the convening date of the board. Lack of notification to an officer does not provide an independent basis for the officer to be considered by a standby board.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 14504 states that a first lieutenant on the reserve active-status list of the Army who has failed of selection for promotion to captain for the second time shall be separated not later than the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. As a commissioned officer, the applicant should have known approximately when he was due for consideration for promotion to captain. If he did not receive official notification of when the board was scheduled to convene in a reasonable amount of time prior to his expectation of that board convening, he should have contacted his manager for assistance. As Department of the Army Pamphlet 600-3 states, an officer’s career is largely in his or her own hands. Reasonable diligence should have led the applicant to request a copy of his OMPF months prior to his expectation of the board convening, review his OMPF and correct it as necessary, and keep in touch with his manager to ensure any necessary corrections were made. There is no evidence the applicant did anything of this sort. The lack of notification to the applicant alone is insufficient reason for the Board to grant the relief requested.

3. The applicant’s discharge orders are not available. However, considering the promotion board which considered him for promotion to captain the second time was not approved until around 1998, it appears that a discharge date around 1998 would have been appropriate.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wtm___ __aao___ __clg___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062287
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011101
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091205C070212

    Original file (2003091205C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to major under the criteria 1998 through 2000 by a United States Army Reserve (USAR) promotion board and promotion to major in the USAR. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, verified the applicant is currently still in an active duty status and has been considered and selected for promotion to major by a active duty promotion board. The regulation further specifies that an officer who has an established date for removal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076998C070215

    Original file (2002076998C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His records also show orders dated 20 February 1995 that indicate he was reassigned to a different Reserve unit effective 1 March 1995. The applicant became eligible for promotion to captain on 16 February 2000, after meeting all the requirements for promotion; therefore, his date of rank for captain has been correctly established.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080028C070215

    Original file (2002080028C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The regulation further specifies that BA degrees required for Reserve promotion to captain or above, must be completed not later that the day before the selection board convening date and all commissioned officers initially appointed on or after 1 October 1987 must posses a BA degree from an accredited institution recognized by the United States Secretary of Education. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090384C070212

    Original file (2003090384C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components can only grant a waiver for an upcoming selection board and the request must be received prior to the convening date of the selection board. The opinion also stated that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) is the office that has the authority to grant a waiver for education for past criteria. The regulation also specifies that completion of an OAC not later than the day before the selection board convening date is required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052598C070420

    Original file (2001052598C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By memorandum dated 14 April 1993, the Office of Reserve Components Promotions of the PERSCOM notified the applicant that he was promoted to captain in the Reserve component with an effective date of 26 May 1993. The regulation provides that mandatory selection boards will be convened each year to consider Army Reserve officers in an active status for promotion to captain through lieutenant colonel. As a result of his transfer to the Army National Guard, his promotion to captain in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083549C070212

    Original file (2003083549C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Effective 29 August 2003, the applicant was discharged from the USAR based on his nonselections for promotion. The regulation in effect at the time provided for standby advisory boards (STAB) in those cases where an officer was eligible for consideration and whose records were not submitted for review and for officers whose records contained material error when viewed by the board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064771C070421

    Original file (2001064771C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he is a Judge Advocate General (JAG) officer who has served 44 of his 52 months of commissioned service on active duty and has not been promoted to the rank of captain, due to misinformation by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) and various systematic failures by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). The three supporting statements from his chain of command all attempt to explain that the applicant was assured, to his detriment, that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069937C070402

    Original file (2002069937C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served as an enlisted member of the Army National Guard in Pennsylvania and then New Jersey, from 24 April 1980 through 26 June 1987. The applicant was correctly discharged according to regulation and law for two-time nonselection for promotion to CPT and is not eligible to be reinstated in the Reserve as an officer beyond the correction date of 12 February 2001 above, although he may be eligible to enlist which can be determined by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081735C070215

    Original file (2002081735C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was promoted to captain effective 1 March 2002; however; his eligibility date for promotion to captain was 24 March 2001, which should have been adjusted one year according to ROPMA. The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a 2LT and 4 years as a 1LT before promotion to captain. The Board notes the advisory opinion provided by PERSCOM that stated promotion to 1LT required 3 years TIG, with a PED of 25 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090452C070212

    Original file (2003090452C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major. The applicant's records show he received officer evaluation reports (OER) for the periods ending 5 May 1992, 14 April 1994, and 4 November 1994, in which each rater stated the applicant should be selected for and attend OAC. The applicant had not completed his military education by the convening dates of the 2001 and 2002 promotion boards, he was not qualified for promotion without an...