Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062137C070421
Original file (2001062137C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 10 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062137

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Charles Gainor Member
Mr. Joe R. Schroeder Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel under 1992 and 1993 criteria and reconsideration under 1996 and 1997 criteria.

APPLICANT STATES: That the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) advised him on 1 July 1998 that his records were not presented to the 1992 and 1993 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB’s). He also states that his records were incomplete when reviewed by the 1996 and 1997 RCSB’s.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which show the applicant is a Reserve officer who has been considered and not recommended for promotion to colonel under 1993 criteria.

The applicant’s request, dated 13 July 1998, was received and retained by the Office of Promotions, PERSCOM for authority to conduct special selection boards (SSB’s) for promotion reconsideration to colonel.

The PERSCOM, at the request of this Board, arranged for the applicant’s records to be reviewed by an USAR SSB under the 1993 selection criteria. Thereafter, the PERSCOM advised that the officer was not recommended for promotion to the grade of colonel, USAR.

The applicant’s records have previously been reviewed by the appropriate SSB for promotion consideration to the grade of colonel, USAR under the 1992 criteria and he was not recommended. He has been notified of these results.

Current promotion policy provides, in part, that to be fully qualified for selection, a member must be in the zone of consideration, on active duty or participating satisfactorily in Reserve training, qualified physically, morally and professionally, capable of performing the duties of the next higher grade under mobilization conditions, educationally qualified (commissioned officers only), and that, for certain specialty fields, individual must possess the appropriate SSI and/or other qualifications.

The policy further provides that, to select those who are best qualified, the selection board must first determine which members of a group are fully qualified, and that the best qualified are then selected from that group.

Under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act implemented on 1 October 1996, any request for reconsideration by an SSB for officers in the grade of captain and above for year criteria after 1 October 1996, must be submitted by the officer to the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM.

Army Regulation 15-185 establishes procedures for making application, and the consideration of applications, for the correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through this Board. This regulation specifies that no application will be considered until the applicant has exhausted all effective administrative remedies afforded him/her by existing law or regulations, and such legal remedies as appropriately available to the applicant.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s available records have now been reviewed by the appropriate SSB for promotion consideration to the grade of colonel, USAR, and he was not recommended for promotion under the 1993 criteria.

2. The consideration for promotion by the SSB has accorded the applicant a fair and complete consideration for promotion under the 1993 selection criteria as intended by statute and regulation.

3. The Board notes that the applicant was considered and not selected by an SSB under 1992 criteria.

4. Because promotion boards are not permitted to disclose the reasons for non-selection for promotion, there is no record of why the applicant failed to be selected. In this regard, it must be noted that the selection board that considered the applicant for promotion was instructed to selected not only those who were considered fully qualified for promotion, but those who were considered best qualified for promotion from the fully qualified group. Accordingly, it must be concluded that, when reviewed by the SSB the applicant’s overall record failed to meet the standards established for selection on a best-qualified basis.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. It is also noted that the applicant has not exhausted his administrative remedy concerning reconsideration for promotion under 1996 and 1997 criteria by requesting promotion reconsideration directly to the Office of Promotions.

7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.



DETERMINATION
: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_jrs_____ _cg______ _lls_____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062137
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011010
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063917C070421

    Original file (2001063917C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The document submitted by the applicant shows that on 22 August 2001, the Promotion and Notifications Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, advised the applicant that due to information that reflects that his records were omitted from the promotion boards for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, he must request promotion consideration to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091750C070212

    Original file (2003091750C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was not provided due process because the majority of his official military personnel file (OMPF) was not available for review by the promotion selection boards and the special selection boards (SSB's). Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), it was determined that the applicant’s OMPF contained material error when he was considered and not selected for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010374C070208

    Original file (20040010374C070208.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Officer Record Brief shows he was assigned with the 343rd Support Center, Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) from 28 March 1994 to 1 December 1996, and he was promoted to major/O-5 (MAJ/O-5) on 22 June 1995. On 17 May 2004, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, informed the applicant that a Special Selection Board (SSB) convened to consider him for promotion to LTC under the 2002 criteria; however, he was again not selected for promotion, which confirmed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083549C070212

    Original file (2003083549C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Effective 29 August 2003, the applicant was discharged from the USAR based on his nonselections for promotion. The regulation in effect at the time provided for standby advisory boards (STAB) in those cases where an officer was eligible for consideration and whose records were not submitted for review and for officers whose records contained material error when viewed by the board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080028C070215

    Original file (2002080028C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The regulation further specifies that BA degrees required for Reserve promotion to captain or above, must be completed not later that the day before the selection board convening date and all commissioned officers initially appointed on or after 1 October 1987 must posses a BA degree from an accredited institution recognized by the United States Secretary of Education. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090384C070212

    Original file (2003090384C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components can only grant a waiver for an upcoming selection board and the request must be received prior to the convening date of the selection board. The opinion also stated that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) is the office that has the authority to grant a waiver for education for past criteria. The regulation also specifies that completion of an OAC not later than the day before the selection board convening date is required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062139C070421

    Original file (2001062139C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was not considered for promotion to the grade of colonel in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), as a result of administrative oversight or material error. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which show the applicant is a Reserve officer who has been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084855C070212

    Original file (2003084855C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his major (MAJ) date of rank (DOR) be adjusted to 30 June 1994 based on the constructive credit he received upon his appointment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The record also confirms that based on the applicant’s constructive service credit his PED to MAJ would have been established as 30 June 1994; however, he remained in training in the STRAP through 30 June 1996, and at the applicant’s request in an application to this Board, action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016770

    Original file (20080016770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of constructive credit for his 10 years of pastoral experience and adjustment to his dates of rank (DOR) for captain and major. In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of an Army Reserve Personnel Center-St. Louis (ARPC-SL) Form 1035 (Computation Sheet for Establishing Constructive Commissioned Service Date, DOR, and Projected Promotion Eligibility Date of Reserve Officers), two DD Forms 2088, his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078620C070215

    Original file (2002078620C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon a review of the case by an official of the PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and not selected for promotion by the Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSBs) convening November to December in 1995,...