| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states that she was awarded the SBP in the divorce decree and the FSM notified the Army that his SBP coverage was to be changed.
4. The FSM’s military records show that he was born on 11 March 1913. He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U. S. Army Reserve in June 1935. He was transferred to the Retired Reserve in 1959. He began to draw retired pay in March 1973.
5. The FSM enrolled in the SBP for spouse and child coverage, reduced base amount, apparently when he was first offered an opportunity to do so. During the 1981 – 1982 Open Season, he raised his coverage.
6. On 10 May 1990, the FSM and the applicant divorced. A qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) dated 10 May 1990 stated in pertinent part “…It is further ordered…that (the FSM) …fully complete, sign, and return to Retired Pay Operations…to confirm the Armed Services Survivor Benefit election previously made … to continue to provide the Armed Services Survivor Benefit Plan benefits to (the applicant)…”
7. By letter dated 7 April 1991, the FSM wrote to the U. S. Army Finance and Accounting Service informing them that he was designating the applicant as his former spouse to receive the SBP.
8. The FSM died on 5 January 2001. The death certificate lists his marital status as divorced. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service indicated that no one is currently receiving the SBP annuity.
9. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law.
10. Public Law 97-35, enacted 12 August 1981, established the second Open Season from 1 October 1981 – 30 September 1982.
11. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
12. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
13. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is evidence of Government error in this case. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 10 May 1990. The FSM was ordered to provide the SBP to the applicant as his former spouse. On 7 April 1991, within the one year period required by law, the FSM made a written request that his SBP be changed to provide for former spouse coverage. For an unknown reason, his request was not processed.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM concerned made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage on 7 April 1991, within one year of the 10 May 1990 QDRO, and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.
2. That the applicant be advised that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due.
3. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s change in SBP coverage retroactive to 5 January 2001, the date of his death.
BOARD VOTE:
__jlp___ __mhm___ __rks___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Jennifer L. Prater
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061812 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011120 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003619C070205
The applicant provides a DA Form 5002 (SBP Election); the FSM’s Alimony Support Statement; a General Power of Attorney; a DFAS-CL Form 5890-2 (Designation of Beneficiary Information); the FSM’s Retiree Account Statement; the FSM’s Last Will and Testament; the FSM’s and the applicant’s joint bank account statement; an Assignment of Proceeds of Insurance with a listing of funeral expenses; a divorce decree; and the FSM’s Certificate of Death. There is no evidence that either the FSM or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822
The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013050
The evidence of record shows that at the time of his retirement, the FSM elected not to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage. Neither the applicant nor the FSM made a former spouse election within one year of the divorce as required by law. The FSMs death certificate indicates that the FSM was remarried after he and the applicant divorced; therefore, SBP benefits shifted to the beneficiary category in effect at the FSMs time of death, his widow, D, if they had been married for at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050007628
Robert W. Soniak | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The FSM continued to pay SBP premiums for almost 24 years after the divorce, and the available evidence shows he never remarried. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a written request on 1 October 1983 to change his SBP coverage to former spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072861C070403
The applicant states that the divorce decree ordered the FSM to designate the former spouse as his SBP beneficiary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member is participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. That the FSM's former spouse be paid the SBP annuity retroactive to 6 June 2001, the date of the FSM's death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060422C070421
In 1989, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he elected former spouse coverage on 1 January 1990, within one year of his divorce. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage on 1 January 1990 and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553
There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012679
Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved. At the time of his retirement, the FSM elected RCSBP coverage for his spouse. Although the applicant could have and should have made a written request to have the FSM's RCSBP converted from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce, the evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002065650C070402
The applicant was appointed the executor-administrator of his estate. Records at DFAS-CL indicate the FSM continued to pay SBP premiums until his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.