Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061721C070421
Original file (2001061721C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 20 December 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061721


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III Member
Mr. Lester Echols Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.
The Board considered the following evidence:

          Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS

 : That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be changed to a medical discharge. He states that he joined the Army with a disability and the Army accepted him. While on duty his illness got worse and he was not given a medical discharge. He further states, that a psychiatrist, who advised him that he was disabled and could not continue in the Army, saw him.

 PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

 EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army as a private, pay grade E-1, on 5 February 1980 for 3 years.

He was advanced to pay grade E-2 on 5 June 1980.

 On 2 February 1981, his commander initiated a flagging action (FLAG) against him to block promotion to pay grade E-3, because the individual’s performance had been such as to not warrant promotion.

 He was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 1 June 1981, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, administrative discharge conduct triable by court-martial. He had a total of 1 year, 3 months and 27 days net service.
There are no medical records available that indicate that the applicant was treated for a disability while in the service.

His records show a Veterans Administration form 07-3101a (Request for Information), was completed by the applicant with the following: Item 9, “See attachment”, If You Received Any Treatment While in Service, Complete the Following Information, items 26A, Nature of Sickness, Disease or Injury, “Injury to Feet”; Item 26B, Dates of Treatment, “June to Dec 1980”; Item 26C, Name, Number or Location of Hospital, “Army Base, Strasburg Kaserne”, Germany; and Item 26D, Organization at time Sickness, Disease, of Injury was Incurred, “US Army.”

Army Regulation 635-40, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation, paragraph 4-1, provides that a member who is charged with an offense for which he could be dismissed or given a punitive discharge (a dishonorable discharge or a BCD) may not be referred for disability processing unless the officer exercising appropriate court-martial jurisdiction dismisses the charge or refers it for trial to a court-martial which cannot adjudge such a sentence.

Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-1, provides that the mere presence of impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability. In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the member reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, rank, grade or rating.

Army Regulation 635-40, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation, Appendix B, Army Application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, paragraph B-3f, provides that conditions which do not render a soldier unfit for military service will not be considered in determining the compensable disability rating unless the conditions contribute to the finding of unfitness.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 1 June 1981, the date of his discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 June 1984.

The application is dated 15 August 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of the case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit the application within the three-year time limit.

BOARD VOTE :

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_ jns ____ _ le ____ _ tbr ____ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records
INDEX
CASE ID AR2001061721
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011220
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. A70
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003708

    Original file (20140003708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on a review of the medical evidence of record, applicant's testimony, and presentation by his counsel, the formal PEB concluded that the findings and recommendations of the informal PEB are appropriate as stated in paragraph 2-1 of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation). The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003708

    Original file (20140003708 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on a review of the medical evidence of record, applicant's testimony, and presentation by his counsel, the formal PEB concluded that the findings and recommendations of the informal PEB are appropriate as stated in paragraph 2-1 of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation). The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018231

    Original file (20140018231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was found unfit to perform and continue his military service because of physical disability due to three hernia injuries * his multiple injuries interfered with his ability to perform his job requirements * the derogatory narrative reason for separation and codes on his DD Form 214 misconstrues the real reason for his separation * he was instead chaptered out for motivational problems and/or a defective attitude when the real reason should have been his chronic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000893

    Original file (20080000893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she had medical issues during the time of her service. There is no evidence showing that she completed this training or that she was awarded a military occupational specialty. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant had medical issues during her period of active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000273

    Original file (20150000273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He acknowledged that: * he had been advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action under the provisions of paragraph 5-31, Army Regulation 635-200, Personnel Separations * he had been advised of the effect on future enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018466

    Original file (20090018466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition - Physical Profile Record), dated 11 January 1980 * Medical Diagnosis, dated 29 May 1979 * Extract of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3, paragraphs 3-13b, 3-14a, and 3-14b, dated 14 December 2007 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017733C070206

    Original file (20050017733C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was diagnosed as having a post right wrist laceration with good repair prior to his entry on AD. The evidence shows that the applicant understood that if his request for discharge was approved that entitlement to VA benefits would be determined by the VA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014580

    Original file (20100014580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A second DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant entered this period of active duty on 27 December 1978 and he was discharged on 18 October 1983 in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. d. The applicant was AWOL on 17 April 1981 and remained in an AWOL status through 22 August 1983. e. Upon his request, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011629

    Original file (20110011629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 October 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he receive a UOTHC discharge. If a Soldier is found unfit because of physical disability, this regulation provides for disposition of the Soldier according to applicable laws and regulations. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows he had an unfitting medical condition or should have been referred to the Army PDES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015515

    Original file (20090015515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his records to show he was medically discharged instead of honorably discharged; b. correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: (1) items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. With respect to his education, the evidence of record shows at the time he enlisted in the ARNG, he was not a high school graduate. ...