| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request that his failure to be selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel be set aside and that he be reconsidered by a special selection board.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he is deserving of promotion to lieutenant colonel based upon his performance, but that promotion board members went to the Fiscal Year 1999 (FY99) Lieutenant Colonel, Army Competitive Category, Promotion Selection Board with "pre-selected lists" resulting in less qualified officers being promoted over him. In support, he provides: a copy of a self-authored memorandum to the President of the FY99 Board, dated 24 February 1999, in which he explains non-rated time from 880730-881130; and a copy of an undated letter from the US Army Military Personnel Center (PERSCOM) advising him that the period 830316-831023 was unaccounted for in evaluation reports.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in a memorandum, prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 22 February 2001 (AR2000042901). The applicant provides new evidence in the form of the two documents mentioned above. He contends that these documents were presented to the promotion board, but not considered in the selection process.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's statement that promotion board members had "pre-selected lists" of officers who were promoted over him is without merit.
3. There is no evidence that the applicant's non-rated periods operated against him in the promotion consideration process.
4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submission from the applicant, are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__AAO__ __MHM__ __KAH__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001061432 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | 20010222 |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020129 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.0100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056948C070420
In support of his request, the applicant submits: a 3-page brief for the Board to consider; a memorandum from the Secretary of the Army, subject: Selection Board Instructions-FY99 Colonel, JAG Corps, Promotion Selection Board, dated 19 July 1999; and three documents from the US Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), Alexandria, Virginia, consisting of a memorandum, subject: FY99 Promotion List for Colonel, Judge Advocate General's Corps Competitive Category, dated 19 November 1999, a MILPER...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067143C070402
The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (LTC) as 1 April 2000. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officer and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) states in paragraph 3-19a that officers and warrant officers who have either failed selection for promotion or who were erroneously not considered for promotion through administrative error may be reconsidered for promotion by either a promotion advisory board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081524C070215
The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request to PERSCOM for promotion reconsideration by the FY98 LTC Chaplain Promotion Selection Board. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a second request for promotion reconsideration. There is no evidence available to the Board which shows that the applicant's awards or decorations were removed from the ORB submitted to the FY99 promotion selection board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064824C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be reconsidered for promotion to Colonel, Medical Corps (MC) by a Special Selection Board (SSB) and, if selected, that he be given an effective date of rank of 23 June 2000. APPLICANT STATES : That he was passed over for promotion to Colonel, MC by boards that convened in 1998 (FY98) and in 1999 (FY99).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084419C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant, a Regular Army, JA major was non-selected for promotion by the FY 99 and FY 00 promotion selection boards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010479C070206
The applicant states, in effect, he was denied due course promotion to MAJ because his company command Officer Evaluation Report (OER) was not timely processed and he was not considered by the FY99 Major, Army Competitive Category, Promotion Selection Board. 99-068. e. His company command OER for the period 19980320 – 19990319, with DA Form 200 (Transmittal Record) showing the OER was shipped on 7 April 1999. f. DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 21 September 1999. g. A 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053043C070420
On 19 July 1996, 17 July 1997, and 27 May 1998, the applicant was notified by letter, signed by the IDARNG Adjutant General, that he had been considered by annual selective retention boards which recommended him among the best qualified for continued retention in the IDARNG. The National Guard Bureau Personnel Division rendered an opinion that the applicant’s record was properly reviewed by a State Adjutant General Selective Retention Board and he was not selected for retention. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063427C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Soldiers who failed to successfully complete or to attend their scheduled NCOES would have their promotions revoked. Although the present policy regarding conditional promotions apparently was put into practice to correct the problems with soldiers who could not be promoted when eligible because they had not attended, and then completed BNCOC, ANCOC (Advanced NCO course),...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102694C070208
Army Regulation 600-8-29 (Officer Promotions) states that an officer will not be considered or reconsidered for promotion by an SSB for a number of reasons, including when the promotion selection board did not see an official photograph. If for some reason they cannot do so (if the officer being considered by the SSB is in the population being considered by the scheduled, regular board or if any of the members sat on the original board), they will contact the appropriate office (OTJAG, if...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053664C070420
Therefore, since the contested OER was properly filed at the time, there was no error in his record when reviewed for promotion to major by the fiscal year FY99 selection board. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below, to show there is no longer a basis for the granting of his request. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by rescinding the Board’s...