| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he sustained a wound to his right hand during combat in Vietnam in 1967.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant was inducted on 7 April 1966. He served as a duty soldier in Vietnam from 29 August 1966 through 31 August 1967 and was honorably released on 5 April 1968.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action.
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
Evidence of record shows that on 14 March 1968 the applicant underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he sustained a wound to his right hand during combat in Vietnam in 1967. However, there is no evidence of record to support this contention.
2. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
RJW___ KAN_____ REB_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001061325 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010125 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060440C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073702C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057636C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082215C070215
However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant received a third wound that resulted from hostile action. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Vietnam during three campaigns entitling him to wear three bronze service stars with the Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the second award of the Purple Heart for wounds received on 14 March 1968 and the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066055C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, there is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078291C070215
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, this statement, is not sufficient by itself as a basis for award of the Purple Heart, in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded. The preponderance of evidence in this case shows the applicant was not wounded or otherwise entitled to the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083552C070212
There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart, the applicant provided an e-mail from a Navy corpsman at the time in question who indicates that he kept a diary of his service in Vietnam and that he has a personal knowledge of the applicant being treated for his wounds in Vietnam. That all of the Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069177C070402
There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant received the Army Commendation Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070791C070402
There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The applicant signed his discharge document on 7 July 1968 attesting to the fact that he was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star for wear on his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077197C070215
There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service...