| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
2. The applicant requests correction of item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the entry “1998 11 10” (10 November 1998) instead of the entry “1999 11 09” (9 November 1999).
3. The applicant states that his date of rank (DOR) on his DD Form 214 is incorrect. In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of US Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) letter, dated 14 December 1998.
4. The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the US Marine Corps (USMC) on 25 January 1968, as a rifleman. He continued to serve in the USMC until he was honorably discharged on 19 August 1969.
5. He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant on 11 August 1978, in the Medical Service Corps. He was ordered to active duty (AD) on 7 October 1978, and was released from AD on 15 August 1981.
6. He was ordered to AD in the Army Guard/Reserve on 30 September 1985, in the rank of first lieutenant.
7. He was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC) on 10 November 1998.
8. He continued to serve until he was placed on the Army of the United States Retired List on 30 April 2001, in the rank of LTC.
9. Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his DOR as “1999 11 09.”
10. Information provided by AR-PERSCOM staff revealed that the applicant’s promotion to LTC/0-5 on 10 November 1998, was correct.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of LTC on 10 November 1998. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of
item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 21 to show the entry
“1998 11 10” (10 November 1998).
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing in item 12h (Effective date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 the entry “1998 11 10” (10 November 1998).
BOARD VOTE:
__kk___ __to____ ___rb___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Karol A. Kennedy___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061324 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011211 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 20010501 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR .600-8-24 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 3 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073123C070403
Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) and/or Special Selection Board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. The Board notes the applicant's contention that his DOR's for CPT and LTC should be adjusted based on his CSC awarded at appointment. Since his DOR for MAJ has been corrected to 6 June 1991, he is also eligible for promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072422C070403
Her current DD Form 214 shows her effective date of pay grade as 15 November 1999, the date she was laterally appointed to corporal (CPL/E-4), which was the same pay grade that was awarded on 1 April 1998. Item 12h of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows her DOR as “1999 11 15.” The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SPC/E-4 with a DOR and effective date of 1 April 1998, and was laterally appointed to CPL with a DOR and effective date of 15 November 1999.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054604C070420
The effective date of promotion and date of rank shall be the same as if the officer had been selected to the grade concerned by the promotion board for Active Duty List officers. In response to a query from a member of this agency, the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) provided another advisory opinion concerning the applicant’s case, stating on the one hand that the applicant came on active duty in the correct grade and received the maximum amount of constructive credit allowed, but...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056353C070420
If the promotion board’s recommendations are approved after the MYSIG, the effective date of promotion and date of rank will be the date that the board’s recommendations are approved. The Chief, Promotions and Notification Branch, PERSCOM – St. Louis, provided an advisory opinion that the applicant’s promotion effective date, 30 August 2000, was correct, as that was the date he transferred from a major’s position in a TPU to the IRR and attained promotable status. Having attained his MYSIG...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084771C070212
The effective date and date of promotion of non-unit USAR officers will be no earlier than the approval date of the board, the date of Senate confirmation (if required), or the date the officer meets MYIG, whichever is later [emphasis added]. The opinion stated that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the 1999 DA Reserve Components Selection Board with a promotion eligibility date of 23 February 2000, and was subsequently promoted by promotion memorandum, dated 9 May 2000,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014891
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060014891 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 4b (Pay Grade), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected to show the entry "O-5", instead of "O-4." He was placed on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008580
Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show at the time of retirement her rank/grade was colonel (COL)/O-6 vice lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O5. Since she did not serve in the grade of COL for 3 years in an active status, she is not entitled to the benefits associated with that promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011767
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: a. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command Orders Number 162-057, dated 11 June 1999; b. a memorandum from National Guard Bureau (NGB), dated 13 December 2001; c. Joint Forces Headquarters Indiana, Orders 327-497, dated 23 November 2007; d. DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 26 June 2009; e. two memoranda prepared by the applicant, subject: Request for Information from Joint Task Force Headquarters, IN ARNG, dated 24...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010479C070206
The applicant states, in effect, he was denied due course promotion to MAJ because his company command Officer Evaluation Report (OER) was not timely processed and he was not considered by the FY99 Major, Army Competitive Category, Promotion Selection Board. 99-068. e. His company command OER for the period 19980320 – 19990319, with DA Form 200 (Transmittal Record) showing the OER was shipped on 7 April 1999. f. DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 21 September 1999. g. A 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068891C070402
The correct name of the board to which the applicant refers is the US Army Reserve Command Board (USARC) Colonel Command Assignment Selection Board (CCASB). The USARC CCASB, currently governed by USARC Regulation 140-5, Army Reserve Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel Command Assignment Selection Board Program, revised 1 July 2000, convenes twice a year. He submitted the necessary documents and was later informed that he had an integrity issue concerning his awards.