Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061312C070421
Original file (2001061312C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 1 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061312


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment contract (DD Form 4) be corrected to show that he reenlisted for a term of service which will bring him to, but not exceed, the date in which he will have 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was erroneously reenlisted for a term of service which established his Expiration Term of Service (ETS) past the date he turned age 60. This error was discovered when he requested an exception to policy to be retained beyond age 60 to attain retirement eligibility.

4. The applicant’s military records were not provided to the Board. However, documentation pertaining to the applicant’s erroneous reenlistment have been provided with his application which show that, while assigned to a USAR Troop Program Unit (TPU) as a drilling reservist in pay grade E-4, on 9 August 1998 the applicant immediately reenlisted for 6 years, giving him a new ETS of 8 August 2004.

5. On 18 May 2001 the applicant’s unit commander submitted a request for an exception to policy to retain the applicant beyond age 60 to allow him to earn retirement eligibility. The applicant’s commander stated that the applicant would reach age 60 on 10 July 2001 but would not reach retirement eligibility until 12 October 2002.

6. On 29 June 2001 the Office of the Chief, Army Reserve (OCAR), approved an exception to policy to retain the applicant beyond age 60. The OCAR also directed the applicant’s command to take steps to correct his ETS.

7. Army Regulation 140-111, Table 2-3, Line 8, states that soldiers who are between age 55 and 59 can only reenlist for the number of months or years required to reach the last day of the month in which the member attains age 60. Paragraph 5-10 of this regulation specifically prohibits the correction of the term of service or effective date of a reenlistment without the approval of this Board.

8. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB. The NGB
CONCLUSIONS:

1. An obvious error was made in reenlisting the applicant for a term of service which established his ETS past the date he would turn age 60.

2. The OCAR has determined that an exception to policy was warranted in the applicant’s case to allow him to reach retirement eligibility.

3. The Board concurs with the OCAR’s assessment and recommends correcting the applicant’s reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted for the days, months and years necessary for him to attain retirement eligibility.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned reenlisted on 9 August 1998 for the days, months and years to establish his ETS as 31 October 2002.

BOARD VOTE:

___aao__ ____wtm ____clg _ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __________Walter T. Morrison ______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059123
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011101
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059123C070421

    Original file (2001059123C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 140-111, Table 2-3, Line 8, states that soldiers who are between age 55 and 59 can only reenlist for the number of months or years required to reach the last day of the month in which the member attains age 60. The Board concurs with the OCAR’s assessment and will recommend correcting the applicant’s reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted for the days, months and years necessary for him to attain retirement eligibility. That all of the Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004062C070206

    Original file (20050004062C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve- Qualifying Service for Retired Pay - Non Regular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (a) attained age 60; (b) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and, (c) served the last 8-years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve Components Soldier. Applicable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000237C070208

    Original file (20040000237C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to indicate that he has 20 qualifying years of service in the Reserve and he is eligible to receive retired pay. In the applicant's self-authored letter of appeal for a favorable response, in effect, a request for a waiver to allow him to continue his service beyond the maximum age of 60 so that he would attain eligibility to receive Reserve retired pay, he stated that his unit completed paperwork for an extension on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008910

    Original file (20140008910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Approved request for extension beyond age 60 * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * Letter, requesting extension beyond age 60 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Application for Retired Pay * Age 60 Retirement Seminar invitation * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) * Congressional Inquiry * Email exchange * Orders P-12-91234,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077570C070215

    Original file (2002077570C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be extended past his mandatory removal date (MRD) of 7 December 2002 to earn additional qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement. The Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006325

    Original file (20080006325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 9 April 2008, which authorized the CAARNG G-1 (a colonel) and a warrant officer of the CAARNG to submit his request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in his stead; a memorandum, dated 7 April 2008, from the CAARNG G-1 to the Army Review Boards Agency who states that the applicant has been a good and faithful Soldier to his unit, the CAARNG, and the United States Army, and that it would be a shame to not allow him to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098522C070212

    Original file (03098522C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 1415 states that a Reserve officer who is in an active status and who reaches age 60 will be transferred to the Retired Reserve if qualified and requests such transfer, or be discharged from the Army Reserve. Army Regulation 135-155 provides the policy for selecting and promoting commissioned officers of the Army Reserve and states in effect that a report of a selection board exists after the promotion board issues a signed board report. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014820

    Original file (20110014820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states her deceased husband declined to make a Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) election until he turned age 60 and then he declined to participate in the SBP. Having already completed his required service and having been issued his 20-year letter on 3 July 2007, and having already turned age 60, the FSM was immediately eligible for non-regular retired pay and qualified as a standard annuity participant, rather than a Reserve Component Annuity participant. Notwithstanding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009723

    Original file (20060009723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states, in effect, if he is granted retirement point credit from the time he was erroneously discharged, he will have 20 qualifying years of service and be eligible for retired pay at age 60. The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the USAR for a period of 6 years on 15 April 1983. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant has 17 years, 11 months, and 13 days of qualifying service for Reserve Retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067568C070402

    Original file (2002067568C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As supporting evidence he provides the 22 September 1988 letter from his doctor, an ARPC Form 249-2-E dated 2 March 2000, a 4 December 2001 letter from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) denying his application for retired pay, a Retirement Points Accounting System Summary Points Inquiry dated 4 December 2001, and his discharge orders dated 28 September 1988. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with...