| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | |
| Mr. Eric N. Anderson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for upgrade of his bad conduct discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That Army doctors themselves diagnosed him with depression yet never once was he given medication. He was sick so he went home to Houston, TX. All he was guilty of was being in the throes of depression and having a hard time adjusting -- anywhere. He should have been discharged for medical reasons or gotten an administrative discharge for inability to adjust at worst. He provides two copies of service medical documents that show he had depression and was emotionally unstable; a 22 October 1998 letter from a civilian doctor showing he was being treated for Depressive Disorder, not otherwise specified; and an 8 March 1999 letter from the same civilian doctor.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 5 June 2001 (AR2001052359).
An undated service medical document, item 40 indicates the physician noted the applicant suffered from depression and nervous(ness). An undated Report of Medical Examination, SF 88, item 74 notes the applicant suffered from emotional instability.
The 22 October 1998 letter from the applicant’s doctor notes that the applicant has a lengthy psychiatric history, including treatment for depression in 1988 and 1994, failures with numerous medications.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) states the essential feature of Major Depressive Disorder is a clinical course that is characterized by one or more Major Depressive Episodes. It states the essential feature of a Major Depressive Episode is a period of at least 2 weeks during which there is either depressed mood or the loss of interest or pleasure in nearly all activities. The mood in a Major Depressive Episode is often described by the person as depressed, sad, hopeless, discouraged, or “down in the dumps.” Nowhere in DSM-IV is being unable to distinguish right from wrong and being able to adhere to the right mentioned as a condition of Major Depressive Disorder.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board acknowledges that the applicant now is being treated for depression and may have suffered from depression while he was in the Army. However, he was in the Army for more than one month before he departed absent without leave (AWOL) for the first time and should have known by that time that the Army considered AWOL to be misconduct. He provides no evidence to show that any depression he may have suffered from caused him to be unaware that it was a breach of Army discipline for him to go AWOL. In fact, the inability to distinguish right from wrong is not one of the attributes of depression.
2. There is no evidence to show that if the applicant did suffer from depression while he was in the service that his depression would have required treatment or that any treatment would have been any more successful than his later treatments were.
3. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments, are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jhl___ __mkp___ __ena___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001061302 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011204 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19670320 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 105.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011167
To deal with the trauma which later became known as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), he self-medicated with alcohol and drugs. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge prior to his discharge. He stated, when he requested discharge, that he did not like Germany or the Army at all so he reenlisted to go to Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003185
Counsel states: * the applicant had several serious medical conditions that, under the governing regulations, should have rendered him unfit and medically retired due to, but not limited to, PTSD and major depressive disorder with psychotic features * the governing regulations, Army Regulation (AR) 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) and AR 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), rebut the presumption of regularity * the applicant had much more than a mere...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085559C070212
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that contrary to the Board’s original Memorandum of Consideration, he was not given any mental status evaluations in the year 2000, “let alone March 6 th 2000” as the Board noted. As noted in the Board’s previous action, the applicant’s commander initiated actions to administratively separate the applicant from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 (personality disorder) on 28 March 2000. The Board notes that the December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07329-02
supports a diagnosis of a personality disorder. documents (sustained irritability, paranoia, not mixing well with people) are seen in personality disorders, including the one (Avoidant Personality Disorder) with which the Navy psychiatrists diagnosed this patient. A condition * The symptoms documented in the mental health assessments 3. meet DSM-IV criteria for a personality disorder -- see Reference The symptoms documented do not meet DSM-IV criteria for (c) either manic, hypomanic, major...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070718C070402
On 22 September 2000 the applicant’s squad leader counseled him concerning his performance, stating that he had not improved since being diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and that it would be in his and the Army’s best interest that he be separated because of his personality disorder. On 23 October 2000 the applicant’s commanding officer notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him from the Army for a personality disorder under the provisions of Army Regulation...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2006-055
Upon the applicant’s discharge from the hospital on July 30, 2002, Dr. N, a psy- chiatrist, diagnosed him with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, as well as a Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, but with Cluster B Traits.3 Dr. N reported that the applicant had no mental disease, defect, or derangement and was “capable of distinguishing right from wrong and adhering to the right. Upon admission to the hospital on July 24, 2002, a psychologist interviewed the applicant and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060828C070421
The report shows that the examining official had talked with the applicant’s mother, who stated that the applicant had a long pattern of not following directions and rules, and of being rebellious; and that appeared to have been a trend since basic training. The applicant stated at various times that he wanted to get out of the Army as evidenced by a 5 January 2001 counseling report, an 11 January 2001 evaluation, and a 20 March 2001 BMD evaluation. The applicant has been diagnosed as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075283C070403
On 8 October 1998, an Air Force Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found the applicant to be unfit for duty due to bipolar I disorder and recommended she be referred to the Army reviewing authority for disposition. The evidence of record shows the applicant was placed on the TDRL due to bipolar I disorder and subsequently determined to be physically unfit due to bipolar I disorder requiring psychiatric treatment that effectively managed her symptoms. Therefore, it appears that the Article 15...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011325
Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's previous request for correction of his records to show he retired by reason of permanent disability with a 100-percent disability rating. The ABCMR relied on the physical evaluation board's (PEB's) determination that the applicant's diagnosed condition of major depressive disorder was in full remission at the time of the hearing, thereby removing him from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The decision granted his request for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061571C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...