| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for a 15-year US Army Reserve (USAR) retirement.
3. The applicant states that, according to the Retired Military Almanac, after a person has been notified of his eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60, that eligibility may not be denied or revoked. In effect, he states that his commander notified him that he was eligible for the Selective Reserve Transition Benefit Program (SRTBP) and he elected early retirement. He adds that when he applied for retired pay in late 1997, the US Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informed him that he was not eligible for retired pay as he did not have the requisite 15 years of service. He concludes that his treatment by the Army is an insult adding, “Yes, I’m retired from the Army, but I don’t get retirement pay, nor retirement benefits, and have been robbed of my option to get separation pay.”
4. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of the applicant’s case on 27 June 2000 (AR1999028792). The applicant was born on 11 April 1929 and is a medical doctor. He was a Lieutenant Colonel, Medical Corps, with 12 years of qualifying service in the USAR and an active member of a USAR Troop Program Unit until his unit was downsized and his position was eliminated. On 20 September 1995, his commander notified him by letter that he was eligible for the SRTBP and provided him with an election form to complete.
5. The SRTBP was established in response to a required post-Cold War force drawdown and the need to fairly and equitably treat Reserve Component soldiers for their military service. Affected were any Selected Reserve personnel who lost their paid drill positions due to inactivation, relocation or reorganization of their units during the drawdown period (1 October 1991-30 September 1999). Special benefits included separation pay and early qualification for retired pay at age 60 wherein members with at least 15, but less than 20 years of qualifying service could elect to transfer to the Retired Reserve, and those with at least 6, but less than 15 years of qualifying service could receive separation pay.
6. The applicant was erroneously led to believe that he qualified for early retirement pay and elected to transfer to the Retired Reserve effective 16 October 1996. When he applied for retired pay, AR-PERSCOM informed him on 26 June 1998 that he did not have 15 qualifying years of service and could not receive retired pay.
7. When he applied to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, this Board saw no unfairness or inequity in the applicant’s being denied a 15-year retirement. Expressing the views of the Board, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army offered that, although the applicant may have been mislead to believe he qualified for early retirement, he should have known that he did not have the requisite number of qualifying years of service. His request for a 15-year retirement was denied.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s argument that he should be permitted to retire based upon the issuance of an eligibility letter is without merit. The applicant was never issued a retirement eligibility letter; such letters, called 20-year letters, are issued by AR-PERSCOM and not by individual TPU commanders. The applicant was issued a letter with subject: Selective Reserve Transition Benefit Program.
2. The applicant never would have qualified for any type of retirement due to his advanced age and the qualifying service accrued by him; he never could have reached the 15 or 20-year mark.
3. Under the SRTBP, it appears that the applicant would have qualified for separation pay based upon his having at least 6, but less than 15 years of qualifying service. Had he not been led to believe that he qualified for a 15-year retirement, it seems likely he would have elected the separation pay option.
4. As a matter of fairness and equity, it would be appropriate to change the applicant’s SRTBP election from that of taking a 15-year retirement to taking separation pay at the time of his 16 October 1996 departure from his TPU.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. Voiding the transfer of the individual concerned from his TPU to the Retired Reserve on 16 October 1996;
b. Separating the individual concerned from his TPU and the USAR on 16 October 1996; and
c. Paying to him separation pay under the appropriate formula established by the Selective Reserve Transition Benefit Program for members who have at least 6 years, but less than 15 years of qualifying service.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__RVO__ __JPI ___ __RKS__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061241 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020307 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DASA |
| ISSUES 1. | 136.0300 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079849C070215
AR-PERSCOM informed him the he had been discharged effective 22 June 2001 and would not receive future VSI payments. AR-PERSCOM stated that Public Law and the implementing instructions of the Department of Defense (DOD) Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7A, Chapter 35, requires that individuals receiving VSI "must continue to serve in a Reserve Component for the entire period of eligibility for VSI" unless the member's "transfer is required by reason of failure of selection for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001019
U.S. Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) message number 93-164, dated 20 April 1993, announced the criteria for the fiscal year 1993 early retirement program (the first year the program was offered). Personnel approved for early retirement will receive the same benefits as individuals with 20 years or more service except that their retired pay will be reduced. Not only was the 15-year retirement authority not in effect at the time of the applicants discharge, he also did not have the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062154C070421
The applicant requests that his voluntary resignation from the IRR (Individual Ready Reserve) be revoked and that he be reinstated in order to continue to draw his annual VSI (Voluntary Separation Incentive) payments. The applicant states that he was honorably discharged on 31 July 1993, under VSI and was transferred to the US Army Reserve (USAR). The applicant’s record confirms that he served honorably for 10 years on active duty and was entitled to the VSI upon his separation on 31 July...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010201
The applicant was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve and was promoted to CW3 effective 30 September 1992. It provided that, during the period beginning 23 October 1992 through 30 September 1999 (later extended to 31 December 2001), a member of the Selected Reserve who had completed at least 15, and less than 20 years of qualifying service as of 1 October 1991 could, upon the request of the member, be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Paragraph 4-4a provided, in pertinent part, that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010493
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his records to show he was retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) instead of discharged under the Early Release Program Special Separation Benefit (SSB). Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 93-164, dated 20 April 1993, prescribed eligibility requirements and application procedures for early retirement for Regular Army Soldiers. The May 1994 PERSCOM message implementing the Fiscal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069937C070402
The applicant’s military records show that he served as an enlisted member of the Army National Guard in Pennsylvania and then New Jersey, from 24 April 1980 through 26 June 1987. The applicant was correctly discharged according to regulation and law for two-time nonselection for promotion to CPT and is not eligible to be reinstated in the Reserve as an officer beyond the correction date of 12 February 2001 above, although he may be eligible to enlist which can be determined by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508451C070209
As a second alternative, he requests correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the VSIP. Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. Further, the PERSCOM noted that case that the approval of the applicants request for the SSB option and the implementation of the legislatively amended VSI benefits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090554C070212
He was discharged in 1995 with 16 years of qualifying service. He stated that he had completed over 18 years of service in the Army Reserve. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 12 December 1995, the date of his discharge; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 11 December 1998.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010368C070208
The applicant states that after further discussion with SFC T_____ he was informed that he could not be retained in the Reserve but he could be put in the Retired Reserve and that he would receive pay and full benefits. Army Regulation 135-180 also states in paragraph 2-3, that a 20-Year Letter will be issued to the Reserve component Soldier within 1 year after they complete 20 years of qualifying service for retirement. Louis process the applicant’s DD Form 108 (Application for Retired...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019457
Through his Member of Congress, the applicant states: * he is asking for reconsideration of a previous ABCMR decision because the evidence he previously presented was misinterpreted * when he first appealed to the ABCMR, his application received an incorrect advisory opinion from an official in the Retired Pay Branch at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * this official provided an advisory opinion full of false statements, as shown by both previous and newly-submitted evidence * he...