| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: That his defense counsel was inadequate. He contends that his defense counsel threatened him that if he did not plead guilty and remain silent he would be given one year in confinement and issued a dishonorable discharge. In support of his application, he submits a letter from a social worker dated 8 June 2001.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were destroyed or lost during the National Personnel Center fire of 1973. Records available to the Board were obtained from alternate sources and show that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 July 1952 for a period of 3 years. He is entitled to wear the National Defense Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal and the Parachutist Badge.
On 7 April 1954 the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of failure to repair and breaking restriction. His punishment consisted of 30 days hard labor without confinement and forfeiture of $60.
On 19 April 1954 the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of failure to obey a noncommissioned officer (NCO), injuring himself to avoid service as an enlisted member and breaking restriction. He was sentenced to be confined at hard labor for 6 months and to forfeit $55 pay per month for 6 months.
On 2 July 1954 the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of assaulting a superior NCO by striking at him with his fists and a stone and disobeying a lawful order from this superior NCO. He was sentenced to be dishonorably discharged from the service, to forfeit all pay and allowances and to be confined at hard labor for 6 months. On 9 July 1954 the convening authority approved the sentence.
The Staff Judge Advocate’s Review indicates that a psychiatric report was conducted and no disease was found.
The Army Board of Review affirmed the findings and sentence on 26 July 1954.
The applicant’s appellate review was completed on 31 August 1954.
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial on 31 August 1954. He was issued a Dishonorable Discharge Certificate.
The available records do not contain a discharge document. However, a Certification of Military Service was prepared on 19 June 1996.
The applicant provided a letter from a social worker, dated 8 June 2001, in support of his claim. The social worker states that the applicant reported he had experienced significant stress, significant racial harassment and was evaluated by a psychiatrist and diagnosed with schizoid personality prior to his discharge. The social worker also states that it appears from some of this history that the applicant may have been suffering from a mental disorder at the time he was in the service.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board considered the applicant’s contentions that his defense counsel was inadequate and had threatened him. However, there is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support these contentions.
2. The Board considered the applicant’s contentions that he had experienced significant stress, significant racial harassment and was evaluated by a psychiatrist and diagnosed with schizoid personality prior to his discharge. However, there is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support these contentions.
3. The Board also considered the social worker’s contention that the applicant may have been suffering from a mental disorder at the time he was in the service. However, evidence of record shows the applicant underwent a psychiatric examination and no disease was found.
4. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
5. The applicant failed to convince the Board through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that his discharge was unjust and should be upgraded.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JNS____ REB_____ LE______ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001061233 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010925 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (DD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19540831 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007298
The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge (GD). His DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 February 1951, and he received a BCD on 17 June 1954 under the authority of Army Regulation 615-364 (Discharge Dishonorable and Bad Conduct), paragraph 1b, and by sentence of court-martial. Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, stated an enlisted person could be discharged with a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007186
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Accordingly, he was discharged in pay grade E-1 on 26 June 1967, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204 (Dishonorable and Bad Conduct Discharges), as a result of a court-martial. The evidence of record shows the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076337C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In 1977 he retained an attorney to submit his request to the Army Discharge Review Board. Army Regulation 635-200 states in pertinent part that a soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075192C070403
On 22 March 1955, at Camp Schimmelpfennig, Honshu, Japan, APO 201, the applicant pled guilty and was found guilty by a general court-martial for willfully disobeying a lawful order from his superior NCO to shovel snow. On 26 April 1955, the sentence was approved as adjudged, except that, in accordance with the pre-trial agreement, confinement at hard labor was reduced to 1 year. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board found no cause for clemency.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010996 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicants military records are not available to the Board. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605091C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 4 June 1979 he pleaded guilty to four specifications of violation of Article 86, UCMJ (214 days AWOL) before a special court-martial convened at the USARB and was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016028C070206
The applicant requests that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. The decisional document further shows that the Board of Review affirmed the general court-martial and found that the findings of guilty and the sentence were approved by proper authority, correct in law and fact as determined on the basis of the applicant's entire record. The applicant contends that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded to a general under honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004052C070208
The applicant requests that the records of her spouse, a deceased former service member, be corrected by upgrading the character of his 1951 discharge to honorable as a matter of clemency. Counsel states that the former service member’s “successful rehabilitation, and integration into society” is demonstrated by the record and evidence submitted by the applicant and notes that the Board has previously acted to change the characterization of a discharge in such cases. In a statement...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016164
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 30 August 1979, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review, having found the approved findings of guilty and the sentence correct in law and fact...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605588C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded. He was found guilty of both charges and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, 3 years confinement at hard labor and a total forfeiture of pay and allowances. The Board notes his contention of good post-service conduct; however, his record as compiled by the FBI indicates arrests since his separation from military service.