Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Member | |
Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his mother, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), be determined to be an eligible beneficiary of the FSM’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
APPLICANT STATES: That the FSM, his stepfather, properly completed the Statement of Intent and sent it in. His mother and the FSM were both assured that the SBP was in effect.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:
He was born on 2 January 1921. After having had prior enlisted service, he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U. S. Army Reserve on 17 October 1949. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 16 February 1968.
On 3 January 1979, the FSM signed a Statement of Intent election to enroll in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for option C, spouse coverage.
On 17 September 1980, the FSM completed a Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel, DA Form 4240. At this time he elected to decline participation in the SBP. His spouse, the applicant’s mother, signed this form as a witness. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) show that the FSM never paid RCSBP or SBP premiums.
The FSM died on 12 May 2001.
The applicant was informed that it appeared the FSM had never paid RCSBP or SBP premiums and requested he inform the Board if he (or the FSM’s widow) would be willing to pay back all due premiums. He did not respond within the given time frame.
Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60
whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.
Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.
Public Law 101-189, enacted 29 November 1989, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 1991 – 30 September 1992. Public Law 101-510, enacted 5 November 1990, delayed the start of the third Open Season to 1 April 1992 – 31 March 1993.
Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999 – 29 February 2000.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The FSM became eligible to enroll in the RCSBP during the interim period between the date the RCSBP was established and before final administrative guidance, to include the appropriate forms, was published. He signed a Statement of Intent indicating that he desired to enroll in the RCSBP for spouse coverage, option C. It appears he may never have completed the appropriate form (a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883) that was later created to enroll in the RCSBP.
2. When the FSM had the opportunity 18 months later to enroll in the standard SBP upon his reaching age 60, he declined to enroll. His spouse signed the DA Form 4240 as a witness. While the FSM may have declined to enroll because he believed he had already enrolled in 1979, the fact remains that he never paid SBP premiums. He would have seen from his annual Retiree Pay Account statements that no SBP premiums were being deducted from his pay. He had two later opportunities, in 1992 – 1993 and 1999 – 2000, to signal his desire to enroll in the SBP. There is no evidence to show that he attempted to enroll during either of these two Open Seasons.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo___ __cla___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2001061094 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 20020228 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 137.01 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326
The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013510
In Part V (SBP Election) on this form, the FSM indicated that he was married and did not have dependent children. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, it would be appropriate, as a matter of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000967
On 9 December 1997, an ARPERCEN letter informed the applicant of the FSM's election to decline immediate participation in the RCSBP and of his election to defer his final SBP election until applying for retired pay at age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the members 60th birthday; (C)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013725C070206
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022283
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Counsel requests the applicant's eligibility for an RCSBP annuity be established and that she be paid based on the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) submitted by the FSM. * the FSM completed 20 of years service and a 20-year letter was sent to him * he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022283
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Counsel requests the applicant's eligibility for an RCSBP annuity be established and that she be paid based on the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) submitted by the FSM. * the FSM completed 20 of years service and a 20-year letter was sent to him * he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011157
The applicant requests, in effect, that her husband's records, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant provided the following documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 1883, dated 19 July 1994; b. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); c....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013913
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013913 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with his application, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated he was married to the applicant and elected "spouse only" SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 20 July 1989, electing "children only" coverage under option B.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415
Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055925C070420
Had the enrollment form used been accepted, the applicant would have been eligible for the SBP had the FSM survived for only three more weeks. The Board cannot change the date of the FSM’s death; however, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he enrolled in the SBP on 12 June 1979. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM completed the DA Form 4240 on 12 June 1979 and enrolled in...