Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061016C070421
Original file (2001061016C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 5 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061016

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Robert J. McGowan Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. June Hajjar Chairperson
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member
Mr. Roger W. Able Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In a disjointed, rambling 3-page application, in effect, an explanation as to why he could not receive a waiver to reenlist in the Army.

APPLICANT STATES: "I was in the Army for active duty training. I got out on a TDP, so why could I not get waivered back in. And I had to sign for selective service. So how can I not get waivered with three different units, if the units say waiver is because of medical. And why was I punished, how did my clothes disappear. Along with my ring which I paid for taken because I did not make the grade. I was in the Army for ADT. I got out on TDP. Could not get back in because of waiver. Waiver indicated medical problem. My pay roster indicates total active 1,20 days and pay of 809.97 with subtractions 504.55 period of computation 4 Jan 79-28 Feb 79. DD 214 states I have 1 mon 20 days ADT and 3 month 6 days inactive. Adding C total service 1 mon 20 D prior 3 mon 6 days total 4 m 6 days. Where's pay for 3 mon 6 days?"

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were not available. The information obtained herein was taken from the Board's previous consideration of his case on 5 June 2001 (AR2000046724).

He was born on 6 April 1960 and completed 9 years of schooling. He enlisted in the US Army Reserve on/about 18 September 1978. He reported for active duty for training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina on 4 January 1979. He was sent to Fort Gordon, Georgia, and assigned to Company D, 3rd Battalion, 1st Student Training Brigade. He was reassigned to the US Army Transfer Point at Fort Gordon on 22 February 1979. He was separated from active duty and as a Reserve of the Army on 23 February 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-33 (Trainee Discharge Program, or TDP) as a marginal or non-productive performer. He was not eligible for further service without a waiver.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-33, Army Regulation 635-200, the Trainee Discharge Program (TDP). Pertinent regulations provided that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, soldiers would be assigned reentry eligibility (RE) codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. An RE-3 code applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Soldiers discharged under the TDP were issued RE-3 codes.

3. The US Army Recruiting Command is responsible for processing waivers to reenlist. Waivers are granted based on the needs of the Army. It is unknown why the applicant "could . . . not get waivered back in [the Army]." The Board presumes regularity in the applicant's discharge process and any subsequent attempts at reenlistment.

4. Concerning the applicant's other statements about his personal effects and military pay, there is no evidence in the record to support his contentions that he was deprived of property or improperly paid, nor has he provided any supportive evidence.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_JH_____ __KAK__ __RWA __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001061016
SUFFIX
RECON 20010605
DATE BOARDED 20020205
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY DIRECTOR
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014642

    Original file (20080014642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he was discharged under medical conditions. The applicant states, in effect, that his military records should reflect that he was honorably discharged under medical conditions. A Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Form 871-R (Trainee Discharge Program [TDP] Counseling), dated 31 July 1979, essentially shows the applicant approached one of his drill sergeants on 30 July 1979 and informed him that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000312

    Original file (20120000312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On or about 3 June 1980, the commander initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-33f(2), trainee discharge program (TDP). The regulation essentially requires that the service member must have voluntarily enlisted; must be in basic, advanced individual training, on the job, or service school training prior to award of a military occupational specialty and must not have completed more...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006291

    Original file (20090006291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1979, the applicant's commander recommended the applicant be discharged under the Trainee Discharge Program. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (Statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the separation program designator (SPD) codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The evidence does show that the applicant was discharged from the Army under the Trainee Discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083418C070212

    Original file (2003083418C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was on “altering meds” at the time he was being counseled by his drill sergeant for his behavior, which the drill sergeant noted, “warranted a discharge under the trainee discharge program.” He contends that he was unfairly discharged and was being treated for swollen feet, asthma, and nasal congestion. In June 2001 the Board was able to locate the applicant’s records and then denied his November 2000 request (AR2000046724) to have his records corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000981

    Original file (20140000981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * VA Form 21-22 (Appointment of Veterans Service Organization (VSO) as Claimant's Representative) * Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Form 871-R (Trainee Discharge Program (TDP) Counseling) * 5 pages of TDP paperwork, dated 10 December 1979, subject: Proposed Discharge Action Under the Provisions of the TDP * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. c. He was also advised that, if he did not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008268

    Original file (AR20080008268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states that: "I found out I was pregnant in April 05 and let my NCO and unit know my husband (fiancee at the time) and I did not have a person for a Family Care Plan in Aug 05. My 1SGT was not there at that drill so I had to wait until Sept 05 drill. Then I found out a year later my unit had transfered me and had discharged me.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003992

    Original file (20110003992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement about her life, family, financial situation, and other issues * VA letter, dated 2 November 1984 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * MIARNG discharge letter, dated 3 February 1982 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) * Enlistment and discharge Standard Forms (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History) * SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination) prepared at the time of enlistment and discharge * Enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009332

    Original file (20120009332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, a medical discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant received counseling on 18 December 1978 for lack of motivation and showing no desire to continue training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021618

    Original file (20140021618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 1979, while serving with the PRARNG he received a DD Form 689 (Individual Sick Slip) for pain on his right hand that he claims he received while on active duty for training. The applicant claims that the DA Form 2173 dated 3 June 1979 was falsified. Additionally, there is no evidence that he was unfit for duty when he was on ADT or that he was unable to perform his MOS was he was discharged from the PRARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062879C070421

    Original file (2001062879C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a document indicating he has changed his full name under the Common Law of Massachusetts; his Report of Separation from Active Duty, DD Form 214; a Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record, DA Form 3349, dated 15 May 1978; three pages extracted from his service medical records; a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital Summary sheet dated 25 July 1979; a VA appeal dated 2 July 1996; a VA rating decision dated 9 March 1999 showing the applicant’s disability ratings for...