Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060786C070421
Original file (2001060786C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 25 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001060786

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Lee Cates Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he has 21 years, 5 months and 13 days of qualifying service for retirement at age 60. He provides a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 10 August 1962, which shows a total of 1 year, 3 months and 24 days of active service and a NGB (National Guard Bureau) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) dated 23 October 1991, which shows 21 years, 5 months and 13 days total service for pay.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

During the period 23 April 1958 through 6 May 1963, he served in the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG). Records show he attained 4 years, 1 month and 12 days of qualifying service towards retirement at age 60.

During the period 7 May 1963 through 31 March 1966, he was assigned to the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) Control Group (Reinforcement) and attained no qualifying service towards retirement.

During the period 1 April 1966 through 23 August 1978, he had no military affiliation.

During the period 24 August 1978 through 23 October 1991, the date of his discharge, he served in the WIARNG and attained 13 years of creditable service towards retirement at age 60. This brought his total qualifying service to 17 years, 1 month and 12 days.

The applicant turned age 60 on 12 April 2001.

On 4 September 2001, the supervisor, Retirements and Annuities, ARPERSCOM opined that the applicant has 17 qualifying years for retirement, as specified in Title 10, United States Code, section 1223 and slightly more than 21 years of total service longevity.

On 27 September 2001, this Board provided the applicant with a copy of the opinion for acknowledgement/rebuttal. The applicant did not respond.

Army Regulation 135-180 prescribes the policy and procedures for granting retired pay benefits at age 60, under Title 10, Unites States Code, chapter 67, sections 1331 and 1337. This regulation specifies, in part, that to be eligible for retired pay an individual must have attained age 60, and completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service (good years); and that subsequent to 1 July 1949, qualifying service is granted only for each year of service an individual earns 50 or more retirement points.

The term “good years” is an unofficial term used to mean years in which 50 or more retirement points are earned during each year, and which count as qualifying years of service for retirement benefits at age 60.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 23 October 1991, the date of his discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 23 October 1994.

The application is dated 24 July 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of the case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit the application within the three-year time limit.

BOARD VOTE:

_kan_____ _reb____ _rjw____ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001060786
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011025
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021915

    Original file (20100021915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he completed 19 years, 4 months and 9 days of military service with 3,031 retirement points; that the remaining 7 months of service be waived; and that he be granted non-regular retirement and retired pay effective 2002 at age 60. The ARPC Form 249-E confirms that during the applicant's military service between 3 September 1959 and 12 December 1995, he completed 15 years and 24 days of qualifying service for retirement and 3,031...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089529C070403

    Original file (2003089529C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. In two separate applications, that the record of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was eligible to receive non-regular retired pay at age 60 based on his completion of fifteen years of qualifying service for Reserve retirement purposes at the time of his death; that the FSM’s rank be restored to sergeant first class/E-7 (SFC/E-7) and that she receive any back pay and allowances that are due as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087273C070212

    Original file (2003087273C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed the 20 years of qualifying service necessary to receive Reserve non-regular retired pay at age 60. This official further stated that at the time the applicant had 19 years of qualifying service for retirement, he was given the authority to stay in the active Reserve until he attained 20 qualifying years of service or reached age sixty, whichever came first, and the applicant had attained age...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002862

    Original file (20090002862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that prior to his August 1999 discharge from the Army National Guard (ARNG) he completed a DD Form 2656 (Data For Payment of Retired Personnel) on 9 November 1998 electing SBP coverage for his spouse and was informed by his officials at his unit that his spouse would be covered. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071421C070402

    Original file (2002071421C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It allows Reserve component soldiers who are involuntarily separated between 23 October 1992 and 31 December 2001 because of medical unfitness to elect transfer to the Retired Reserve for Reserve retirement pay at age 60 based on a minimum of 15 years of qualifying service toward Reserve component retirement. Paragraph 2-8 of that regulation describes qualifying service,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072783C070403

    Original file (2002072783C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be granted Reserve Retired Pay at age 60 or provided an official reason why he is not eligible to receive it. On 11 June 1999, in response to the applicant’s application for Retired Pay at age 60, the ARPERSCOM informed the applicant that in order to be eligible for USAR Retired Pay, he must have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011539

    Original file (20130011539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. An e-mail, dated 3 June 2013, from a Service Retirement Specialist, WIARNG, to the Chief, Retired Pay Branch, HRC, shows the Service Retirement Specialist confirmed the FSM did not receive his 20-year letter until 7 January 2001 and had made his RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt of the letter. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's record to show his RCSBP election was made and processed in a timely fashion after the issue date of this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011148C080407

    Original file (20070011148C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states that the FSM's original Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Letter (20-Year Letter) and Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate (DD Form 1883) were not found in his records; however, she found copies of his 20 January 1999 20-Year Letter and an Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) Letter, dated 22 March 2000, which notified her that the FSM had failed to submit a DD Form 1883 within the prescribed timeframe and that she was therefore...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015370

    Original file (20110015370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter, dated 10 June 2011, from TAG, WIARNG, who supports his request for a non-regular retirement citing the applicant's medical condition as the reason for non-compliance with the law that required the last 6 years to be in a Reserve Component in order to qualify for non-regular retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004485

    Original file (20090004485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he qualified for an early non-regular retirement due to physical disability. The applicant contends that he should not have been discharged on 1 April 1994; but rather, transferred to the Retired Reserve and provided a letter of notification informing him of his eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60. The applicant's commander took action to separate him from the Army National Guard and the Reserve of the Army due...