| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Through a combination of documents, including an unsigned DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), an unsigned DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States), and a signed SF 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records), that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) so he can qualify for Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) benefits.
APPLICANT STATES: That he became an alcoholic while serving in the military; that he is trying to quit drinking; and that he needs VA benefits for rehabilitation and halfway house services.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 December 1979 for a period of 3 years. He enlisted for the United States Army Combat Arms Unit/Area of Choice Enlistment Option (8th Infantry - Europe). Following completion of all military training, the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B, Infantryman, and was assigned to Germany.
On 30 October 1980, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for willfully disobeying a lawful order from a superior noncommissioned officer. As punishment, the applicant was reduced to the rank of private/E-1 (suspended), given 14 days of extra duty, and forfeited $100.00 pay.
On 1 December 1980, the applicant accepted an NJP for willfully disobeying a lawful order from a superior commissioned officer. The applicant was confined for 30 days in the Baumholder Central Confinement Facility and reduced in rank to private/E-1.
On 16 December 1980, the applicant departed his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status and remained absent until apprehended by civil authorities in the United States on 3 October 1983. He was returned to military control at the Personnel Control Facility (PCF), Fort Dix, New Jersey. On 6 October 1983, the applicant, in an interview at the PCF, indicated that he went AWOL because of personal problems.
On 7 October 1983, the applicant was advised that he was being recommended for separation from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, for commission of a serious offense. He was advised of his rights. The applicant, after consulting with legal counsel, waived his rights to a board of officers and declined to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 2 November 1983, the unit commander recommended that the applicant be separated from the Army. On 7 November 1983, the intermediate commander recommended approval of the separation action.
On 16 November 1983, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200 with a UOTHC discharge and waived trial by court-martial on a charge of desertion. Accordingly, on 16 December 1983, the applicant was discharged from the Army after completing 1 year, 2 months, and 27 days of active military service and accruing 655 days of lost time.
On 5 May 2001, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge; however, it was beyond its 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, convictions by civil authorities, desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s 655 days of AWOL constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of soldiers in the Army and adversely affected the quality of his service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline. This incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant’s service below that meriting a GD.
3. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
4. The Board found no evidence that the applicant was ever diagnosed with, or treated for alcohol abuse while in the service. Even if the applicant did develop an alcohol abuse problem while in the military, he had many avenues available to him to obtain help.
5. The Board does not upgrade discharges for the sole purpose of an applicant obtaining VA benefits.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JLP___ __MHM _ __RKS__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001060583 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011120 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19831216 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, c14 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Misconduct, commission of a serious offense |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Director |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.9320 |
| 2. | 144.9405 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061208C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, AR 635-200. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005386C070208
On 6 January 1982, the approval authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 and directed that he be separated with a UOTHC discharge in pay grade E-1. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that, on 23 February 1982, the applicant was separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 with a UOTHC discharge, due to conduct triable by court-martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106980C070208
The application submitted in this case is dated 28 August 2003. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was separated on 5 May 1982, under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 15 February 1983, the date the ADRB denied his appeal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020689
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140020689 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a personal statement, letters from employers, and arrest records that constitute new evidence not previously considered by the Board. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 27 June 2001.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102195C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 December 1980, the applicant was separated in absentia with a UOTHC discharge for conduct triable by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083254C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence in the available records to indicate that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102910C070208
The evidence of record shows that on 30 July 1980, the applicant consulted with counsel and submitted a request for discharge from the service under chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board during its 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of her discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate, but the separation authority may direct a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020458
The applicant states: a. On 18 June 1981, the applicant was discharged accordingly. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017481
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to a general discharge (GD). On 30 March 1984, the separation authority approved his separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016642
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides no statement, but indicates his application should be considered based on his military personnel file and additional documentation he is submitting. On 18 September 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct and directed he be issued a UOTHC discharge.