Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060499C070421
Original file (2001060499C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 8 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001060499


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he served honorably for the period of enlistment from 19 May 1978 to
25 May 1981.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he received both an honorable discharge and a bad conduct discharge (BCD), however, his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show his honorable service. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 19 November 1982.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 May 1978. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist).

5. The record reveals no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition. However, it does contain a disciplinary history that includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two separate occasions. The first on 6 April 1979, for failing to go to his prescribed place of duty and the second on 11 June 1979, for violating a written order. Also, on
15 October 1979, he was convicted by a special court-martial of wrongfully transferring, possessing and using marijuana.

6. The applicant received a waiver and was allowed to immediately reenlist for 3 years, which he did on 26 May 1981.

7. On 30 September 1981, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of wrongfully possessing, transferring, and selling marijuana. He was sentenced to be reduced to pay grade E-1, to be confined at hard labor for 4 months (that confinement in excess of 60 days was suspended for 6 months), to forfeit $200 pay for 4 months (that forfeiture in excess of $100 of pay for 2 months was suspended for 6 months) and to a BCD.

8. On 12 May 1982, the U. S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence. Accordingly, on 19 November 1982, the applicant was separated with a BCD pursuant to the special court-martial sentence. At the time of his separation, he had completed 4 years, 2 months and 27 days of creditable active military service and had accrued 96 days of lost time.

9. On 28 September 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge.


10. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing DD Form 214. Paragraph 2-4, states in effect, that for soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except honorable the following entry will be made in block 18 (remarks) “Continuous Honorable Active Service” from (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) until (date before commencement of current enlistment).

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his separation document does not account for his first period of honorable service and it finds this claim has merit.

2. By regulation, block 18 (remarks) of the DD Form 214 issued to soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except honorable should contain an entry that shows any periods of honorable service for which a DD Form 214 was not issued.

3. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant initially entered active duty in the Regular Army on 19 May 1978 and served honorably until being discharged on 25 May 1981, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. On
26 May 1981, he immediately reenlisted for 3 years and was separated from that period of service with a BCD.

4. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable regulation, the Board concludes that the applicant’s DD Form 214 should have contained the following entry in block 18 (remarks): ”Continuous Honorable Active Service” 780519-810525 and it finds it would be appropriate to add it to his separation document at this time.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by adding the following in block 18 (remarks) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 dated 19 November 1982: "Continuous Honorable Active Service" 780519-810525.

BOARD VOTE:

__FNE __ __BJE__ __KYF __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Fred N. Eichorn __
                                                      CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001060499
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2001/11/08
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091559C070212

    Original file (2003091559C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, the applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that his MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) was not that of a receiving clerk, but as a 36K10, 05M, and/or a 31V (communications). He also requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to delete the remark that he was discharged because of an established pattern of shirking. On 14 January 1982 the applicant's commanding officer notified the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010939

    Original file (20060010939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show that he entered military service in 1979. The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 4, dated 21 December 1981. Army Regulation 635-5, paragraph 1-4 (DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), subparagraph b(5), states that the DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted members discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001401

    Original file (20130001401.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) to show "Yes" instead of "No" * item 18 (Remarks) to show an entry that he supported the Indian Ocean/Iran campaign, Iran hostage crisis during tours with the 58th and 327trh Signal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002233

    Original file (20090002233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A USAICS Form 174, dated 31 March 1978, that shows the applicant successfully completed the Signal Security Specialist Course for military occupational specialty 05G (Signal Security Specialist) on 31 March 1978. c. A DD Form 256A, dated 8 May 1980, and Headquarters, 569th Personnel Service Company (Germany), Orders 130-4, dated 9 May 1980, that show the applicant was honorably discharged from the RA on 8 May 1980 and reenlisted in the RA for a period of 4 years on 9 May 1980. d....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012256

    Original file (20080012256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 August 1981, the applicant’s immediate commander initiated a Bar to Enlistment/Reenlistment Certificate against the applicant citing his three instances of nonjudicial punishment and extensive history of counseling. This form further shows he completed 4 years and 9 months of creditable active military service. XXX _________________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086179C070212

    Original file (2003086179C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an ending date of 31 March 1989 to show: Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to correct his records to show he held MOS 11C for 23 years and 7 months. That so much of the application as it relates to correction of his DD Form 214, with an ending date of 31 March 1989, to show he held PMOS 67V for 16 years; MOS 67Y for 6 years and 3 months; MOS 67N for 17 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017105

    Original file (20080017105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 31 August 1982 and was discharged on 22 May 1989 under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14 (Misconduct), based on civilian conviction. The evidence of record also shows that the requirement to prepare the DD Form 214 for enlisted members discharged for immediate reenlistment was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021297

    Original file (20140021297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his case was an isolated incident and that there were no alcohol/drug treatment services available at the time of his service. Special Court-Martial Order Number 106, dated 3 August 1983, shows the convening authority approved the sentence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021360

    Original file (20120021360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records by issuing him a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his honorable service during his first enlistment and correcting his last DD Form 214 to reflect his service during his second period of service. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows that he served from 19 July 1977 through 8 June 1981. The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge and which continues to this day...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087260C070212

    Original file (2003087260C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct period of time he served as an infantryman and as a dual component. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: No orders are available which might show he was awarded this MOS on a different date.