Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060179C070421
Original file (2001060179C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001060179


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor Chairperson
Mr. Eric N. Andersen Member
Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, award of the Purple Heart. He makes no statement and submits no evidence in support of his request.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 2 November 1967 and served in Vietnam between May 1968 and May 1969. He was released from active duty on 5 November 1970. Neither his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) nor his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart. Item 40 (wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant authenticated his DA Form 20 in November 1969 and his DD Form 214 on the day of his release from active duty.

A 1973 disability claim document indicates the applicant reported being treated for pin worms and malaria while in Vietnam but makes no mention of any wounds sustained as a result of hostile actions.

The applicant served an additional period of active duty between January 1971 and January 1977 but made no mention of an award of the Purple Heart and his records do not reflect entitlement to that award.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which confirms he was wounded as a result of hostile action and as such there is no basis for an award of the Purple Heart.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 24 January 1977, the date he was last discharged from the active Army. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 24 January 1980.

The application is dated 5 July 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO__ __ENA __ __TEO __ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION



Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001060179
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010927
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 142.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054812C070420

    Original file (2001054812C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005645

    Original file (20140005645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military medical records he provided are dated from 25 July 1974 to 28 April 1977. The military medical records he provided did not show any evidence he was wounded as a result of hostile or enemy action. Therefore, in the absence of evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and that the treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059595C070421

    Original file (2001059595C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant served in Vietnam as an infantry officer between September 1966 and October 1967 where he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. A performance evaluation report, rendered in May 1968 for the period 11 August 1967 through 15 April 1968 makes no mention of any wounds sustained as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam. On 13 April 1968 the applicant was discharged from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091821C070212

    Original file (2003091821C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no credible evidence of record, or evidence provided by the applicant, to show that he was ever wounded as a result of enemy action and authorized an award of the Purple Heart or that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060025C070421

    Original file (2001060025C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510578C070209

    Original file (9510578C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect award of the Purple Heart and Combat Medical Badge. The physician stated that in December 1966, “while carrying a litter” he asked him about a limp and noticed “he was bleeding from his right leg.” The statement goes on to note “as I recall checking him [the applicant] I located shrapnel in his right leg, right side of waist, and the left upper section of his chest.” PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707314

    Original file (199707314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006699C070206

    Original file (20050006699C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Although the applicant contends he received a Purple Heart in Vietnam in 1967, there are no orders for the Purple Heart and there is no evidence of record which shows he was wounded or treated for any injuries as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010916

    Original file (20060010916.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no medical records in the applicant's official military personnel file that show he sustained wounds as a result of hostile action or that show he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart because of injuries sustained while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000267C070206

    Original file (20050000267C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no evidence. The applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains no evidence to indicate that he was wounded in action. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board.