| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
2. The applicant requests that she be determined to be the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM).
3. The applicant states that she never received any letter requesting her to concur in the FSM’s declination.
4. The FSM’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 October 1974. He retired on 1 November 1994. At that time he declined SBP coverage, the Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel, DA Form 4240, item 24 indicates that a letter was sent to the applicant informing her of the FSM’s election. There is no evidence in the FSM’s personnel files or in the records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to indicate that she concurred in the FSM’s declination.
5. The FSM died on 27 January 2001.
6. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
7. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 and effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides for less than the maximum spouse coverage. A member’s election defaults to full spouse coverage when the spouse’s concurrence is not obtained.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There appears to be Government error in this case. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant concurred in the FSM’s election to decline SBP coverage. In the absence of her concurrence, his election should have automatically defaulted to full spouse coverage. It would be appropriate to collect any SBP premiums due.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant did not concur in the FSM’s election to decline SBP coverage, thereby causing his election to default to full spouse coverage.
2. That the applicant be advised that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due but any interest due is waived.
3. That the applicant be paid the SBP annuity retroactive to the date of the FSM’s death.
BOARD VOTE:
__jhl___ __mdm___ __jam___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Joann H. Langston
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001059960 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011011 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010121C070208
The applicant states that she did not sign the DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) concurring with the FSM's election to enroll in the SBP for a reduced base amount. The evidence of record shows the FSM was first released from active duty for the purpose of retirement on 28 February 1985 and was immediately (1 March 1985) recalled to active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055925C070420
Had the enrollment form used been accepted, the applicant would have been eligible for the SBP had the FSM survived for only three more weeks. The Board cannot change the date of the FSM’s death; however, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he enrolled in the SBP on 12 June 1979. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM completed the DA Form 4240 on 12 June 1979 and enrolled in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025810
The evidence of record clearly shows that the FSM elected not to participate in the SBP without the spouse's concurrence. As a result, the FSM's record should be corrected to show that the FSM elected SBP spouse coverage and that she applied for the FSM's annuity on 13 August 2003, the day after this death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing: a. that the FSM had SBP spouse coverage due to default...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003735
The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death. Section X (Spouse Concurrence) states (in part) "If the member selects Option A (declining to make an election until age 60), and the spouse concurs, no annuity will be payable if the member dies prior to reaching age 60." As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068044C070402
At the time they signed the Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel, DA Form 4240, they were not counseled about anything they were signing nor told deductions were to be taken out (if SBP were elected). The FSM retired on 1 September 1982. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the SBP retroactive to 24 September 2001, the date of his death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002790C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883. The FSM's 20-year letter was issued in 1993.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088023C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C and applied for retired pay. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. a. showing that the FSM applied for retired pay by completing a DD Form 2656 on 1 July 1998...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002897C070206
The applicant states that Section 24 of the DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) contains a signature which has been forged. She requests that this signature be removed and replaced with a statement indicating that she did not agree with the decision of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to decline SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008270
The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request that her military records be corrected to show she elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she be reimbursed for all of the deductions from her retired pay. The applicant provides a DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request), dated 1 May 2009. Although the applicant's spouse concurred with her SBP election on the DD Form 2656, this form reflects that the applicant made no SBP beneficiary election and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060303C070421
By letter dated14 February 2001, DFAS informed the applicant that the SBP portion of his retired pay account was being adjusted from declined to automatic spouse coverage based on the fact his spouse did not concur in his declination. DFAS did not notice this error until seven years later, when they informed the applicant that he had made an invalid SBP election by not obtaining his spouse’s written concurrence with his declination and imposing a $8,000 debt upon him for back premiums. ...