Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059807C070421
Original file (2001059807C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 5 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059807


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Paul A. Petty Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. June Hajjar Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. The applicant states that he was discharged instead of being transferred to the Retired Reserve and that he is concerned that when he turns age 60, he will not receive his retired pay.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he was born on 15 July 1946. He enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 May 1974. He actively participated in the USAR and was promoted through the ranks to sergeant first class (SFC), pay grade E-7, on 13 July 1988. On 26 August 1990, he was ordered to active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) program as a supply sergeant in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG) with a date of rank of 13 February 1983. He was assigned to the 92nd Field Artillery in Akron, Ohio. He was later transferred to the 967th Quartermaster Company in Cincinnati, Ohio, where he was assigned as the supply sergeant.

5. On 1 July 1999, he was issued a U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) memorandum (20 year letter) notifying him that he was eligible for retired pay at age 60. On 19 July 2000, he was honorably discharged from active duty in the AGR as a result of a reduction in force. He was not transferred to any subsequent command. He was discharged as a SSG with 11 years,
1 month, and 2 days active service and 15 years and 25 days inactive service.
He was provided $15,142.05 separation pay.

6. Army Regulation 140-10 prescribes the policy and procedures for transfer to the Retired Reserve. It provides for transfer to the Retired Reserve for soldiers who have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying years for retired pay at age 60. It also provides that the individual must request transfer to the Retired Reserve.

7. The Transition and Separations Branch, AR-PERSCOM, provided an advisory opinion that the applicant will receive retired pay at age 60 without being in the gray area Retired Reserve but that he would not be entitled to any longevity increases that occur from the time he was discharged until attaining age 60 since during that time, he is not a member of the Army. The advisory also indicated that the applicant would have to request transfer to the Retired Reserve. The applicant responded to the advisory opinion requesting assignment to the Retired Reserve and stating that he had signed a waiver so that he could be called up for active duty.

8. The advisory opinion also stated that the applicant would be provided an application for retired pay at approximately age 58. The applicant would need to submit this application to receive retired pay. The separation pay that he


received would be recouped from his retired pay. He will also need to submit a copy of his promotion order to SFC and a copy of his administrative reduction order for SSG AGR, in order to receive retired pay in pay grade E-7, since he served as an E-7 in the USAR for more than 180 days.

CONCLUSIONS
:

1. The applicant was eligible to be transferred to the Retired Reserve at the time of discharge since he had completed 20 years qualifying for retired pay at
age 60. He requested that he be placed in the Retired Reserve. If he is not placed in the Retired Reserve, he will be denied benefits of being in the Retired Reserve. As a matter of justice, his discharge should be corrected to show that he was released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected for the individual concerned by showing that he was released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve on 19 July 2000.

BOARD VOTE:

__jh____ ___ra___ ___kk___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___June Hajjar__
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059807
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020205
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 20000719
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, para 16-8
DISCHARGE REASON Reduction in Force
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 129.02 – Revocation of Orders
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004845

    Original file (20110004845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * Public Law 230, Title 10, and Section 3964 entitle him to promotion to SFC * The "P" shown in item 13 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Date Awarded) of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) indicates he was promotable 3. In his self-authored statement the applicant contends he should be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade held satisfactorily while on active duty, under the provisions of Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069036C070402

    Original file (2002069036C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This policy stated that soldiers, who have not yet attended ANCOC prior to their effective date of promotion to SFC, would be promoted "conditionally." The evidence of record shows that the applicant was administered an APFT on 11 April 2000, for preenrollment at ANCOC and failed the push-up event, which precluded him from attending ANCOC. The applicant's case was reviewed by the USAR AGR Enlisted Reduction Panel, which determined that the applicant should be reduced in rank for failing to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078658C070215

    Original file (2002078658C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was informed that the Standby Advisory Board did not approve his name to be added to the recommended list announced in memorandum, TAPC-MSL-E, dated 2 May 2002, Subject: Promotion List to Sergeant First Class. A soldier who is reclassified, or reassigned pending reclassification, in another MOS before the adjournment date of the board, has been considered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014443

    Original file (20080014443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication or evidence in the applicant's records that she was enrolled in or completed Phase II of MOS 54B BNCOC as stipulated in her promotion orders. The evidence of record further shows the applicant was conditionally promoted to SSG/E-6 on 30 June 1998 in MOS 54B contingent upon her successful completion of BNCOC. With respect to the applicant's contention that she should be considered for promotion to SFC/E-7, there is no evidence that the applicant met grade and/or NCOES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075439C070403

    Original file (2002075439C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states that a soldier who accepts a promotion with the condition that he or she must enroll in, and successfully complete, a specified NCOES course, and fails to meet those conditions, or is subsequently denied enrollment, or becomes an academic failure, or does not meet graduation requirements, or is declared a "No Show," will be reduced to the grade and rank held prior to the conditional promotion. It states that under promotion procedures of this regulation, a soldier may be promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065963C070421

    Original file (2001065963C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he completed Phase I of ANCOC on 23 April 1995; however, his unit administrator (UA) failed to schedule him for Phase II of ANCOC. He is now requesting that he be rescheduled to attend ANCOC and complete Phase I and II with restoration of his rank of SFC or be scheduled to attend only Phase II of ANCOC. The commander requested a waiver of one-year time requirement for completion of ANCOC following the applicant's conditional promotion with the provision that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069175C070402

    Original file (2002069175C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was administratively reduced by a US Army Reserve (USAR) Army Guard/Reserve (AGR) Enlisted Reduction Panel for failing to meet the conditions of his promotion to SFC. It states, in pertinent part, that when a soldier fails to complete a required NCOES course, the soldier's name will be removed from a promotion list, and if conditionally promoted, the soldier will be reduced in accordance with paragraph 7-12d. The applicant stated that his condition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076779C070215

    Original file (2002076779C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the obligated period of service, the soldier will not apply for voluntary nondisability retirement unless the soldier is (a) eligible for retirement by completion 30 years or more active Federal service and (b) already eligible through prior service for a higher grade at retirement and (c) over 58 years of age. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017731

    Original file (20090017731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant contends that the FSM's pay grade in both the DEERS and DFAS databases is incorrect and should be corrected to show he retired in pay grade E-7 so that she may receive her Army benefits and correct SBP annuity. The DFAS database shows the FSM retired in pay grade E-7 on 3 September 1994, the date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003647

    Original file (20080003647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. AR-PERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, show that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective that date. In pertinent part, it stated that promotion vacancies were not required for IRR promotions.