| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage.
APPLICANT STATES: That she was considered the spouse of the FSM at the time of his death. The divorce proceedings were not clear; therefore, she proceeded as his spouse. She was in no way aware that final divorce papers existed. The FSM was a very abusive man but they loved each other. Even with a divorce there was always a chance for them to change and get back together again as husband and wife. He always took pride in all his assignments and as his wife she stood right along with him. He intended to help her be able to live in a reasonable manner with the financial benefits she would receive with the SBP. She planned and took care of the funeral arrangements for the FSM. She took care of his belongings after his death.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: That she represented the applicant in her divorce from the FSM. It was her understanding that the applicant was mistaken about her marital status at the time the FSM died. The applicant is still held liable for all costs incurred by the FSM before his death and for his burial. Under the circumstances that the court proceedings were ongoing, it is strongly acceptable that the applicant was operating as the FSM’s wife before and after his death and she should be entitled to receive the SBP.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 November 1975.
On 10 June 1992, the FSM and the applicant married.
On 1 December 1995, the FSM retired. At that time, he enrolled in the SBP for spouse and child coverage (his Record of Emergency Data, DD Form 93, dated 4 May 1994 shows that he had children from a previous marriage).
On 27 September 2000, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The divorce decree states in part “…I find that Defendant is in Contempt of the Final Settlement Agreement…in which the Defendant was to pay Plaintiff one half of the State and Federal 1999 Taxes Refund…An earnest effort was made to reconcile the parties, however, to no avail. After inquiring of the parties whether there was anything that this Court or anyone could do to reconcile the parties, both parties agreed and this Court is satisfied that any other attempts in this regard would be futile…That the parties voluntarily appeared before this Court…NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: The Plaintiff is hereby granted a Divorce…” No mention of the SBP is made.
On 27 November 2000, the FSM died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head.
Public Law 92-245, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members.
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The evidence shows that the applicant was present at the divorce trial when the Court ordered “The Plaintiff is hereby granted a Divorce…” The divorce proceedings indicated the FSM was not willing to refund to the applicant her share of the 1999 Federal and state tax refund, indicating he never intended to financially provide for the applicant. Contrary to the applicant’s contention that there was a chance for them to get back together again as husband and wife, the divorce decree stated that both parties were queried as to whether there was anything that the Court or anyone could do to reconcile the parties. The Court was satisfied that any other attempts in this regard would be futile.
3. The Board concludes that there is no matter of equity to consider in this case. It was Congress’s intent in establishing the SBP to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career. The applicant was married to the FSM for only three and one half years of his 20-year career.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__lls___ __mhm___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001059763 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010906 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016424C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Since the FSM died with spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010711
The applicant, Mary, a former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states: * she and the FSM were married from January 1950 to June 1995 * when he retired in 1973, the FSM elected spouse only SBP coverage * the divorce decree directed the FSM to change his SBP election to former spouse coverage * neither she nor the FSM made a deemed election...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022154
The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, former service member (FSM), requests she be designated as the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. It is unclear why his SBP coverage changed in May 1993 when his child...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022988
The applicant requests that the records of her former spouse, a retired former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he submitted a copy of the final divorce decree to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) office and that she made a timely written request for a deemed election of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 1 year from the date of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103078C070208
The applicant states that it appears that SBP payments are being made to the FSM’s second wife and that, in view of her Judgment for Absolute Divorce, she should be receiving the payments. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 13 December 1984. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074023C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It is acknowledged that the applicant was married to the FSM for about 17 years prior to the final divorce action in 1994.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019295
The applicant, the former spouse of a retired former service member (FSM), requests the correction of the FSM's records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. The evidence of record confirms the FSM...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017476
c. The applicant received a letter from an SBP counselor indicating the FSM's new spouse could veto the applicant's SBP election; however, the FSM's new spouse cannot override a court order. Paragraph 21 of the court "Findings of Salient Facts and Conclusions of Law" clearly states the applicant may qualify for military benefits such as military ID and commissary/PX privileges, SBP protection, etc., and the FSM should not engage in any acts to prevent the applicant from receiving the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003024
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070003024 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022197
The Military states she is not entitled to continue to receive his retirement after being married for 19 years and 11 months. As for the annuity and there being a record of Bxxxxn L. Hxxxy being married to the FSM, there is no record of the FSM and Bxxxxn L. Hxxxxy ever being married. On 19 June 1990, the FSM and applicant were divorced.