| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was in a lot of pain from a serious car accident that occurred prior to his joining the Army. Because of that pain, he was unable to do all the things required of him physically and mentally. He also states that he wishes he could have conformed to military life and made it a career like other family members did. Lastly, he states that he wants his discharge upgraded so he can die knowing he served honorably.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 1971 for a period of 3 years. He enlisted for the United States Army Station of Choice Enlistment Option (Europe) and the Training of Choice Enlistment Option (Career Group 11, Infantry). The applicant’s Report of Medical Examination and Report of Medical History found him fit and qualified for enlistment and he was assigned to Fort Jackson, South Carolina for basic combat training (BCT). Following completion of BCT, the applicant was assigned to Fort Polk, Louisiana for advanced individual training (AIT).
On 21 August 1971, prior to completing AIT, the applicant departed his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status. On 19 September 1971, he was dropped from the rolls. On 27 September 1971, the applicant surrendered to military authorities at Fort Bragg, North Carolina and was assigned to the Personnel Control Facility.
On 16 October 1971, the applicant departed his unit in an AWOL status and remained absent until 23 November 1971. On 24 November 1971, the applicant was placed in pretrial confinement in the post stockade.
On 29 November 1971, court-martial charges were preferred. The applicant was charged with two specifications of AWOL totaling 75 days.
On 7 December 1971, after consulting with legal counsel regarding his rights, the applicant voluntarily and in writing requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. He did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The company and intermediate commanders recommended that the applicant’s request for discharge be approved with a UD.
On 31 January 1972, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge from the Army with a UD. Accordingly, on 7 February 1972, the applicant was discharged from the Army after completing 6 months and 5 days of creditable military service and accruing 75 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of a UD.
There is no evidence of record that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) within its 15-year statue of limitations.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The evidence of record does not support the applicant’s contention that a pre-enlistment automobile accident and the resultant pain prevented him from doing all of the things required of him physically and mentally, nor has he provided any collaborating evidence to support it. The applicant’s Report of Medical Examination (enlistment physical) found him in good health and qualified for enlistment. The applicant also stated on the Report of Medical History that he was in good health.
2. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
3. The discharge process was in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record. Furthermore, the applicant by amassing multiple periods of AWOL knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a general or fully honorable discharge.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__inw___ __sk____ ___kah __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001059683 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011115 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19720207 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, c10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | In lieu of trial by court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Director |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.9405 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089894C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was transferred to Fort Ord, California to undergo his basic combat training (BCT). The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not present in the available records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081200C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058577C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He did not complete his airborne training and received orders transferring him to Fort Lewis, Washington with a report date of 25 April 1971.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025385
The applicant requests his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. This is reinforced by his statement when he requested discharge, that harassment had turned him to drug use, that his command was prejudiced, and that he had family problems. His 303 days of AWOL is certainly not acceptable conduct and performance.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071500C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge by reason of medical disability. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091341C070212
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 20 May 2003. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004327C070205
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He also states that his discharge should have been upgraded 6 months after he was discharged. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053638C070420
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He did not submit a statement.On an unknown date, the applicant was notified that a board of officers would convene on 10 September 1973 to determine whether he should be discharged due to fraudulent entry under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200. At the time of his enlistment, the applicant knowingly concealed a prior service record and a criminal (felony) conviction, both of which were disqualifying factors.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071841C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022658
The applicants records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 July 1970. His records contain a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 29 August 1970, that shows he was seen at the Fort Campbell dispensary on that date for a complaint of muscle pain in both legs; he also stated he had had polio. Although the applicant was seen on several occasions by medical personnel for complaints of muscle/leg pain, the evidence or record does not show and...