| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a General Discharge (GD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he is terminally ill with hepatitis and cannot breathe. He claims that he contracted hepatitis in the military, as did two of four friends who enlisted with him under the "buddy plan." He adds that he needs Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical benefits.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 24 August 1972, was trained as a track vehicle mechanic, and was assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas.
The applicant went AWOL (absent without leave) from his unit at Fort Riley on or about 13 May 1974 and remained absent until he returned to military control at Fort Sill, Oklahoma on 19 September 1974.
Court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant on 19 September 1974. After consulting with defense counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated offense under the UCMJ. He was advised that the characterization of service for this type of discharge was normally UOTHC.
On 20 September 1974, the applicant underwent a separation physical examination. He was found to be in good health and it is noted that he did not have hepatitis.
On 3 October 1974, the approving authority approved the applicant's separation and directed issuance of a UOTHC discharge. He was separated on 8 October 1974. He had 1 year, 9 months, and 9 days of creditable service and 128 days of lost time due to AWOL.
The applicant did not petition the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) within that agency's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant had a lengthy period of AWOL. When he returned to military control, court-martial charges were preferred against him. His request for a chapter 10 discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with a military lawyer, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial and the punitive discharge that he might have received.
3. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
4. Eligibility for veteran's benefits (to include VA medical benefits) does not fall within the purview of the Board. Furthermore, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of qualifying for benefits. The applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance regarding that agency.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_CLA ___ ___AAO_ ___HBO _ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001059587 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011030 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19741008 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076721C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no record that the applicant ever submitted a request for review of his discharge by the Army Discharge Review Board within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. The Board notes that the available evidence shows that the applicant voluntarily requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005139C070208
Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His request for a chapter 10 discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with a military lawyer, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial and the punitive discharge that he might have received.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012949
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicants medical records show he was placed on convalescent leave on 2 December 1976 for serum Hepatitis. The applicant's record of service shows he received two NJP's for being AWOL, one AWOL period was extensive.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012515
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 11 March 1975, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072112C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He goes on to state that he was denied leave and because of his concerns for his wife and unborn child, he went AWOL to be with her.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064286C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. After consulting with legal counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. On 8 June 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065577C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. After having had prior honorable active service and reserve service the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 June 1975, for 4 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075164C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 16 January 1985, he went AWOL and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Bragg on 26 February 1985, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offense.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058229C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s records contain no evidence and he has provided no evidence to support his contention that he served honorably for 18 months.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012080
However, the available records do contain a duly-constituted DD Form 214 which shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial on 14 February 1977. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general...