Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059522C070421
Original file (2001059522C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059522

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John H. Kern Chairperson
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member
Ms. Paula Mokulis Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show a reentry (RE) code which would allow reenlistment.

APPLICANT STATES: That he would like to enlist in the U. S. Air Force. He has been in the Army National Guard for 3 years and feels that he is qualified to reenter service.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: That the applicant has submitted evidence showing that he is in the Army National Guard. The physical training standards being the same as the Regular Army and the evidence now showing he can pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), relief should be granted.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 February 1995.

On 31 July 1995, the applicant’s commander initiated separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 entry- level performance and conduct; specifically, APFT failure. The applicant acknowledged notification of the proposed action and did not desire to make statements in his own behalf. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation and on 21 August 1995 he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. He received a separation code designator (SPD) of JGA (involuntary discharge for entry level performance and conduct) and a reentry code of 3.

On an unknown date, the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard.

Army Regulation 635-5, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, provides that when the SPD is JGA, an RE code of 3 will be given.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service but the disqualification is waivable.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The assigned reentry code of RE-3 was and still is appropriate. The applicant was disqualified from reenlistment, but the disqualification is waivable under Army regulations. The Board acknowledges that the U. S. Air Force may have different enlistment standards; however, that is not sufficient justification to grant the relief requested.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jhk___ __tl____ __pm____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059522
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010823
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017574

    Original file (20110017574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her separation program designator (SPD) code of "JGA" and her reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 be changed to more favorable codes so that she may reenter the military. It states that the SPD code "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. The applicant did not provide any evidence to support her contention that her drill sergeant told her that she could be discharged if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 1997002298

    Original file (1997002298.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her records be corrected by changing her DD Form 214 (Report of Separation) item 11 (Primary Specialty) to reflect her award of Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) of 31D (Transmission Systems Operator); that item 14 (Military Education) reflect that she completed an 8 weeks Transmission Systems Course; and that item’s 26 (Separation Code) and 27(Reentry Code) reflect the correct codes. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008784

    Original file (20120008784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 September 2000, his immediate commander initiated a separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct). Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058017C070420

    Original file (2001058017C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members who were voluntarily enlisted in the Regular Army, National Guard or Army Reserve, are in an entry level status and, before the date of the initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014044

    Original file (20110014044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 October 2010, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11, by reason entry level performance and conduct. On 19 October 2010, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, by reason of entry level performance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011209

    Original file (20140011209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities and the reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD codes to be used. The regulation shows that the SPD code of "JGA," as shown on his DD Form 214, is appropriate for involuntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002266C070208

    Original file (20040002266C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant’s record confirms he was separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04103125C070208

    Original file (04103125C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation by reason of disability requires processing through the PDES. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record provides no indication that the applicant suffered from a medically disqualifying condition that would have supported her processing through the Army PDES at the time of his separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068930C070402

    Original file (2002068930C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. On 16 June 1995, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance for failing to pass two record APFTs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007633

    Original file (20140007633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the policies and procedures for completion and distribution of the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 11,...