Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059423C070421
Original file (2001059423C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059423


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that the constructive service granted her upon appointment be creditable toward salary and promotion eligibility but not retirement.

3. The applicant states that in the fall of 1999, she and several other civilian nurse practitioners were recruited by Captain O__. Captain O__ informed them that they would receive constructive credit of 5 years time-in-service for pay purposes and enter as a captain with 5 years of constructive credit for promotion purposes, i. e., be eligible for promotion to major 1.5 years after entrance on active duty. In July 2000, when she received her first Leave and Earnings Statement, she realized she was being paid as a captain with 0 years in service. She and two others were told that their options were to be released from active duty (REFRAD) or remain on active duty. The Judge Advocate General’s Office indicated that another option would be to appeal to the Board. The other two nurse practitioners requested release; she did not. She gave up a now higher paying job, sold her home, and displaced her family based on the good faith of what was told to her.

4. The applicant's military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

5. The applicant entered active duty on 9 July 2000 in the rank of captain. She was given 5 years of constructive credit and 1 year, 6 months of promotion credit toward the next higher grade. She was authorized to draw an accession bonus of $5,000 upon presentation of an executed written bonus agreement at her first permanent active duty station. She incurred a 4-year active duty service obligation (ADSO). The facts of the erroneous information given her and others by her recruiter were verified by the Army Nurse Corps Branch, U. S. Army Recruiting Command.

6. Two of the other nurse practitioners requested REFRAD. Around November 2000, the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASA, M&RA) approved their request for waiver of their ADSO. (The ASA, M&RA also directed that the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command ensure there is a proper mechanism to accomplish a discharge, rather than a REFRAD, in this type of case).

7. Army Regulation 135-101 and Department of Defense Instruction 6000.13 provide policy for the appointment of reserve commissioned officers for assignment to service medical branches. They provide that a prospective health professions officer’s entry grade and rank shall be determined by the number of years of entry grade credit awarded on original appointment, designation, or assignment as a health professions officer.

8. The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, paragraph 10105, provides that some medical and dental officers are entitled to extra credit for longevity purposes to reflect the time spent in medical or dental school. All cases involve officers who already had the constructive service credit on or before 15 September 1981 or on 14 September 1981 were participating in a program which led to an appointment as a medical or dental officer.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. It is a rule of long standing that the government is not liable for incorrect information given by its officers, agents, or employees, and such misinformation cannot provide a basis for payment in excess of legal entitlements. The applicant is not entitled to relief as a matter of law.

2. The applicant discovered the error within weeks of her entry on active duty. Normally, the appropriate relief would be to offer to release the soldier from his or her commitment. In this case, however, the Board concludes that the level of detriment accompanying the applicant’s reliance tips the scale in favor of granting the requested relief. The applicant had a good paying job that she quit to join the Army and a family that she uprooted with the sale of their home. It would be more difficult for her than for the average enlistee to again uproot her family and find comparable civilian employment and this most likely acted as a disincentive to accept the Army’s initial offer to separate.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing, as an exception to policy due to the highly unusual circumstances, that all the constructive service granted the applicant upon her appointment be creditable for all administrative calculations, including pay and allowances, with the exception of retirement eligibility.

BOARD VOTE:

__jhl___ __mhm___ __kah___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION


                           Joann Langston
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059423
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010918
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102.08
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017390

    Original file (20110017390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show adjustment in rank or date of rank (DOR) based on being granted constructive credit upon reentering the U.S. Army. Orders Number 294-002, issued by USA HRC, Fort Knox, KY, dated 21 October 2011, announced the applicant's promotion status and shows she was appointed in the rank of MAJ with an active DOR (ADOR) of 30 January 2008. Based on her prior active service and TIG in the rank of MAJ (i.e., 2 years and 2 months), the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 2007000395

    Original file (2007000395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of additional constructive service credit (CSC) and an adjusted higher entry grade on appointment. The applicant military records show that she was appointed in the United States Army Reserve, Army Nurse Corps, as a first lieutenant, effective 28 October 1999, with 5 years CSC. Therefore, based on the evidence provided at the time of the applicant's application for appointment, it appears her initial CSC, and entry grade awarded at the time of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016101

    Original file (20070016101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is in an active status or on an inactive-status list and who reaches the maximum age specified in section 14509, 14510, 14511, or 14512 of this title for the officer’s grade or position shall (unless the officer is sooner separated or the officer’s separation is deferred or the officer is continued in an active status under another provision of law) not later than the last day of the month in which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002300

    Original file (20130002300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests additional constructive service credit for a master's degree to ratify her rank as captain (CPT). The advisory opinion states she qualifies for 2 years of constructive credit for her master's degree that was not annotated on her constructive credit form and the total constructive credit awarded meets the active duty phase line for the rank of CPT. Therefore, her military records should be corrected to show she received a total of 2 years of constructive service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088090C070403

    Original file (2003088090C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: The record shows that the applicant was credited with 2 years' credit for having a Master's Degree and 1 year for his specialized training, for a total of 3 years' constructive credit. AR 135-101 provides that an individual with between 3 and 7 years of constructive credit will be appointed in the rank of 1LT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028125

    Original file (20100028125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was granted 2 years of constructive credit upon entry on active duty in the Regular Army (RA). Part I, section B (Credit for Advanced Education Beyond Basic Qualifying Degree), she was granted a Master of Science Degree in Nursing from the University of South Florida, on 5 May 2000; c. Part I, section D (Credit for Professional Experience), she held an "ARNP Florida License" from 31 July 1995 to 18 November 2008; d. Part II (Prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011125

    Original file (20110011125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the original deliberations in this case the evidence of record and advisory opinion from the Active Duty Nurse Program Manager, USAREC, confirmed the applicant realized the benefit of constructive service credit for her qualifying (masters) degree by being granted 2 years of service in an active status when she was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commissioned officer in the rank/grade of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 and, based upon receiving said credit, she was promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053701C070420

    Original file (2001053701C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6000.13, that she should have been granted two years CSC credit for her MPH in Epidemiology as an adjunctive skill to her primary degree and specialty as a Medical Doctor (MD). The Director of Medical Education, Office of the Surgeon General of the Army, has provided an opinion by memorandum dated 24 October 2000 to the effect that the applicant’s MPH warranted the award of an additional year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069762C070402

    Original file (2002069762C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director, Health Services Personnel Management, Army Reserve Personnel Command, expressed the opinion that the applicant is presently in the United States Air Force. By subtracting 7 years of credit from her appointment grade of captain with a date of rank of 6 July 2000 and applying the balance of 1 year, 8 months and 8 days to her appointment date her adjusted date of rank for captain was established as 28 October 1998. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016455

    Original file (20080016455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he receive additional constructive credit for his prior commissioned service in the Army National Guard and that his date of rank (DOR) to captain be adjusted. The applicant should have received constructive credit of 5 years, 7 months, and 14 days as of the day he was appointed in the Dental Corps. Per the advisory opinion, the applicant was incorrectly not awarded constructive credit for his prior commissioned service in the New York Army National...