| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
He states that he completed basic training in 1950, advanced individual training at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, and was later transferred to Korea. He was able to obtain copies of letters that he had written to his mother while stationed in Korea. Upon arrival in Korea, he was being transported with other troops to his assigned unit, when the vehicle that he was traveling in struck a land mine. He was pinned under the vehicle by his legs. He was transported to an Army hospital where he spent 30 days recovering. On 1 July 1951, he received a shell fragment wound to his left hand. The next wound was between the tibia and fibula of his right leg. He later received additional injuries which were not life threatening. In December 1951, he was transferred to an Army National Guard unit, which is where his problems with drinking began. On 19 July 1953, he was informed to go home and that his discharge would be forwarded to him. He returned home and was employed by several different employers but was subsequently fired for drinking. He was later employed in Muncie and Albany, Indiana, and was apprehended by civilian authorities in Logan, Ohio. He was placed in civilian confinement and was later released to military authorities in Fort Knox, Kentucky, pending court-martial. He remained in military confinement for 30 days and was later discharged with an undesirable discharge. He has served his country honorably, participated actively in combat, received many wounds, and respectfully requests that his discharge be upgraded in order to receive treatment at a Veterans Affairs facility. He concluded by stating that he has spent the last 5 years dedicating his time to veterans of his community and is currently an active member in several veterans’ organizations.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: The Disabled American Veterans (DAV), as counsel for the applicant, stated that it is import that the Board consider all contributing factors surrounding the applicant’s case coupled with the impetuousness of his youth. Counsel also stated that the infractions did constitute military misconduct; however, he is not a criminal. Therefore, with all the evidence as set forth herein; counsel humbly requests any and all doubt that has occurred, be resolved in favor of the applicant and corrective action be taken to change the applicant’s discharge favorably.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant’s military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Records available to the Board were obtained from alternate sources and show he enlisted on 24 June 1950. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) shows that he served as an infantryman.
The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not present in the available records. However, his DD Form 214 shows that on 11 February 1954, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation
615-368, for unfitness. He was furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He had a total of 1 year, 9 months, and 8 days of creditable service and 379 days of lost time due to AWOL.
He was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Distinguished Unit Citation (now known as the Presidential Unit Citation), and the Purple Heart.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 24 July 1981. The ADRB determined that his discharge was proper and equitable and denied his request on 3 August 1982.
The applicant reapplied to the ADRB for an upgrade of his discharge on 1 August 2001. However, the ADRB was precluded from accepting his application due to its statute of limitations. This Board accepted his application (DD Form 149), dated 11 June 2001.
Army Regulation 615-368, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel by reason of unfitness. That regulation
provided for the discharge of individuals who had demonstrated their unfitness
by giving evidence of undesirable habits of character manifested by misconduct.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant and counsel’s contention; however, there is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support his contentions or to show that his discharge was unjust and should be upgraded.
2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
3. The type of separation directed and the reasons for that separation were appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ro___ ___wp__ __ji____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | A2001058921 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011129 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19540211 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-368 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080250C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was only 17 years old when he enlisted and that he was wounded twice but did not receive the Purple Heart. The Board notes that the second injury occurred at 0100 hours on 12 July 1951. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. showing that the individual concerned is awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 12 July 1951; and,b.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001307
On 28 June 1953, the FSM's unit recommended a board of officers be convened to determine whether the FSM should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Unfitness). The certificate, dated 12 June 1953, issued by the Psychiatry and Neurology Service, USAH, Camp Atterbury, essentially stated: * the FSM's diagnosis was anti-social personality manifested by immaturity, impulsive behavior, lack of adequate standards of behavior, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016650
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicants military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 20 February 1951, for 3 years. However, his records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 23 September 1955 in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, with an undesirable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067351C070402
The applicant states, in effect, that he was a young, 17-year old when he enlisted; that he served well in combat during the Korean War and received a head wound; that, upon reassignment from Korea to Japan, his personality changed and he started exhibiting bizarre behavior; and that, when he finally returned to the United States at 2 1/2 years of service and was given his first home leave, he went AWOL (absent without leave) for 5 or 6 months. Once the Department of the Air Force has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005440
However, the Report of Proceedings by a Board of Officers contained in his record shows that a board was convened on 18 March 1953 to determine whether or not the applicant should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368. This regulation further provided that when an individual was discharged for unfitness they would be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021240
He also served 11 years as a constable. The applicant enlisted in the Army for 3 years in 1949. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * voiding his undesirable discharge of 23 May 1952 * issuing to him an appropriate document to show he was discharged with a General Discharge on 23 May 1952 ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008788
However, the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 11 January 1954 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Personnel Separations) with an undesirable character of service. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant's contention that his discharge should be upgraded and the evidence he provided as well as his entire service record,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001542
Should the command deem his performance to be useless to the service the applicant was to be separated from the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Unfitness), by reason of unfitness. The applicant was credited with 1 year, 7 months, and 10 days of active military service. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065688C070421
In April 1955 the applicant appeared before a board of officers who recommended he be discharged for unfitness with an undesirable discharge. On 13 May 1955 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing the individual concerned a DD Form 214 for the period 23 January 1951 through 25 October 1953 which reflects...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103833C070208
The applicant requests that the undesirable discharge of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM) be upgraded to honorable. The attending psychiatrist opined that the FSM was showing a chronic form of psychosis and as such he was not responsible for his conduct. The available records fail to show that this Board ever received or considered the FSM’s application for correction of military records dated 19 September 2002.