Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058895C070421
Original file (2001058895C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 20 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058895


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin Member
Ms. Paula Mokulis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records show he earned the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that the military occupation specialty (MOS) listed in his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to 31B
(Radio Operator).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he served as a Radio Operator in an infantry unit in Vietnam from 3 March 1969 to 27 December 1969, and that the numerical designation for his Radio Operator MOS was 31B.

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 6 September 1968, he entered the Army and that he continuously served on active duty for 5 years, 7 months, and 7 days until 12 April 1974, when he was honorably separated in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG).

5. The applicant’s record shows that he was trained in and served in MOS 05B (Radio Operator) and that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: Army Commendation Medal; Good Conduct Medal; Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device, and National Defense Service Medal.

6. The record also shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 3 March to 27 December 1969, and was assigned to Headquarters, Headquarters Company, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry, 199th Infantry Brigade as a Radio Operator.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. The Awards Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

8. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided, in pertinent part, for award of the CIB. Appendix 3 to Annex A of this regulation listed positions which qualified award of the CIB. The regulation authorized award of the CIB to radio operators provided their primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry -type units on tactical operations.


9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) indicates that during his assignment tenure, the applicant’s unit, HHC, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry, 199th Infantry Brigade, was awarded the Valorous Unit Award, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge, and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class.

10. Army Regulation 611-201, in effect at the time, contained guidance on the enlisted classification structure and a list of MOS numerical designations. It listed the MOS numerical designation of 05B for those members serving as Radio Operators, a numerical designation that remained in effect through 1978.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of records shows that he served as a Radio Operator in an infantry unit that earned valor awards for its combat operations in Vietnam during his assignment tenure. Thus, the Board finds it reasonable to conclude the applicant is entitled to receive the CIB based on his combat service with this unit.

2. The applicant’s unit earned the Valorous Unit Award, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class during his assignment tenure. Therefore, the Board concludes he is also entitled to have these awards added to his record.

3. While the numerical designation of the applicant’s MOS may have changed subsequent to his separation, 05B was the proper numerical designation for members serving as Radio Operators during his active duty tenure. Further, there is no evidence to show this numerical designation has served any type of injustice upon the applicant. Therefore, the Board concludes there is no basis for changing the 05B numerical MOS designation contained in his separation document.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case, particularly the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned, dated 1 October 1970, be corrected to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Valorous Unit Award, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge, and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class and by issuing him a corrected separation document that reflects these changes.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__RJW__ __KWL__ ___PM___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Raymond J. Wagner __
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058895
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2001/09/20
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT) PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083460C070212

    Original file (2003083460C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show 11B (Infantryman) as his secondary MOS and the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the RVN from 30 November 1967 to 28 May 1968. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012479

    Original file (20100012479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry and warrant officers and enlisted personnel who have an infantry MOS. The applicant contends he deserves award of the CIB for serving as a radio operator in Vietnam and the Purple Heart as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014297

    Original file (20110014297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 January 1969. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. Although the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the199th Infantry Brigade and to the 1st Armor Calvary Division in what appears to be MOS 05C, there is no evidence to show he was TDY in support of the Cambodian Incursion and personally present...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080674C070215

    Original file (2002080674C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant was entitled to receive CIB based on his service as a Radio Operator with an infantry unit in the RVN, as indicated in the Unit Orders he provided. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served a qualifying period of honorable service, from 10 July 1967 to 23 December 1969, which entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003460C070206

    Original file (20050003460C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003460 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The record further shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012600

    Original file (20090012600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, evidence shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 27 January 1967 to 3 November 1968; c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011173

    Original file (20070011173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070011173 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is also no evidence to show that while the applicant was assigned in Vietnam he served in an infantry MOS, in an infantry unit, in active ground combat. United States Army Republic of Vietnam Regulation No...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016028

    Original file (20080016028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board further determined that the applicant was not awarded SMOS 11F until 13 October 1969, subsequent to his RVN service, and that his record failed to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM with “V” Device for Valor. The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015748

    Original file (20090015748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Vietnamese Armed Forces Honor Medal, Second Class; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded or authorized to wear the CIB;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011370C080407

    Original file (20070011370C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record in this case, although it shows the applicant was assigned to a qualifying infantry unit, confirms he held and served in MOS 31B as a field radio mechanic while serving in the RVN. His record is void of any orders or other documents showing that he was ever recommended for, or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty, and the CIB is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20. Therefore, the Board requests that...