Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058879C070421
Original file (2001058879C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 25 SEPTEMBER 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058879


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his record be corrected to reflect award of the Army of Occupation Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal. He also appears to be asking that the Board confirm that he sustained injuries to his lower back and right ear during his military service. He states, in effect, that he was injured during training exercises in Germany in the spring of 1959. The applicant submits a copy of a travel order and an Installation Clearance Record (DA Form 137) in support of his request.

3. Information reconstructed from documents provided by the applicant indicate that he was inducted and entered active duty on 10 January 1958. He served nearly 18 months overseas where he was assigned to Company H, 3rd Battalion, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment. In January 1959 he was authorized travel from his duty station to Munich, Germany for the “purp[ose] of medical consultation….” There are no additional records which confirm the basis for the medical consultation. However, unit morning reports from Company H indicate that by June 1959 he had returned to his unit and was authorized several days of leave.

4. The applicant was released from active duty on 16 December 1959, with an honorable characterization of service, and transferred to the Army Reserve. His DA Form 137 indicates his conduct and efficiency were excellent and that he was recommended for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. His DD From 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not reflect entitlement to any awards or decorations.

5. Subsequent to his release from active duty, apparently while a member of the Army Reserve, the applicant was authorized to “have a Physical taken at the Dispensary at Fort Hamilton, Brooklyn.” In March 1962 he was asked to report to the Orthopedic Clinic at Fort Jay, New York “for a final examination before he [the doctor] makes a decision in your case.” Again, there are no medical records available to the Board which confirm the basis for these medical appointments. In 1983 the applicant was informed that because of the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center, attempts to locate his medical records would not be successful because “inpatient and outpatient records prior to 1960” were placed in an individual’s military personnel file. He was also informed that clinical records would have been in his military personnel file which was likely destroyed during the 1973 fire.

6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the




termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states that the Army of Occupation Medal was established in 1946 and awarded for service for 30 consecutive days at a normal post of duty while assigned to a designated location. It was authorized for individuals who served in Germany (exclusive of Berlin) between 9 May 1945 and 5 May 1955. The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was established in 1961 and authorized for award to individuals who participated in certain designated operations within designated locations. During the applicant’s period of military service the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was not authorized for service in Germany. Historical information indicates that the applicant’s unit, the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, originated at Fort Myer, Virginia, on 2 February 1901. In 1957 the unit was assigned to Germany as part of the NATO Forces protecting the border from communist aggression until it returned to the United States in 1964.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 16 December 1959 when he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service. His DA Form 137 tends to support a conclusion that there is no evidence available which would serve as a basis to deny him an award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. In the interest of justice the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 10 January 1958 through 16 December 1959.

2. The applicant is not entitled to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or the Army of Occupation Medal. Neither award was authorized for individuals who served in Germany during the applicant’s period of military service, except those who were serving in Berlin. There is no evidence the applicant served in Berlin during the period in question.

3. The Board can confirm the applicant was authorized travel to see medical personnel early in 1959 and subsequent to his release from active duty. However, there are no records available which confirm the basis for the 1959 referral or the results of any examinations which might have taken place then or subsequent to his separation.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 10 January 1958 through 16 December 1959.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__JNS __ ___LE___ __REB__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____John N. Slone_____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058879
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010925
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2. 108.00
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002079

    Original file (20150002079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years in order to receive airborne training * after jump school he was sent to Fort Jackson, SC, to become an instructor on the techniques of the firing range where he did well and received several letters of commendation * in early 1960, he again requested overseas duty and was sent to the 24th Infantry Division in Germany in February 1960 * shortly after his arrival, he was sent on temporary duty to Vietnam to help the South...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078262C070215

    Original file (2002078262C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 11 th ACR was not listed as a unit that supported the operations of that unit. Although the applicant was assigned to a unit that guarded the Czech border in West Germany, his unit was far removed from Berlin, the only area in West Germany that was authorized to receive the AFEM for service in the Berlin area. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010273

    Original file (20110010273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp is also for authorized for service in the Army of Occupation of Berlin between 9 May 1945 and 2 October 1990. However, his records do not contain any evidence and he provided none to show he was stationed in Berlin. _______ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020136

    Original file (20140020136.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he served in Berlin from 1959 to 1962 and his DD Form 214 does not list the National Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and Overseas Service Ribbon or Overseas Service Bar for his long overseas tour. Tables 2-3 (Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal) of the regulation shows this award was designated for service in Berlin from 14 August 1961 through 1 June 1963. c. Overseas Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085119C070212

    Original file (2003085119C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty during the period 15 October 1958 through 7 February 1962, and his expiration of service date was involuntarily extended under Public Law 87-117, on 1 August 1961, for the convenience of the Government, during the Berlin Crisis. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant was stationed at Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071491C070402

    Original file (2002071491C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the medals and certificates to which he is entitled such as the “Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Cold War Certificate, etc.” However, the applicant has presented no evidence that other soldiers in his unit received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and he was denied that service medal. This medal is not shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214; therefore, the applicant is entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001289C070205

    Original file (20060001289C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany clasp and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show this service medal. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show this service medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007455C070205

    Original file (20060007455C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, through his congressman, that he is entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal for 30 consecutive days of duty in Berlin from 5 September 1945 to 20 October 1990. To be awarded the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp (exclusive of Berlin) service must have occurred between 9 May 1945 and 5 May 1955. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000574C070205

    Original file (20060000574C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 November 1964. While the applicant was mobilized with his unit during the Berlin Crisis, the evidence of record shows that he was never deployed to the area of operation that qualified for award of the AFEM. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024778

    Original file (20110024778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). No other awards or decorations are recorded in section 9. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant received less than "excellent" ratings during the period 21 May through 20 September 1960 while serving in Germany.