Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058420C070421
Original file (2001058420C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058420

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Vic Whitney Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his transfer to the Retired Reserve include entitlement to retired pay at age 60.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was found medically unfit for retention and further military service. He completed over 15 years of qualifying service for retirement and should be eligible under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). He provides a letter from his doctor, his notification of medical disqualification for further military service, his retirement orders, a memorandum from the Office of The Judge Advocate General (OTJAG) concerning TERA implementing instructions, and the denial of his request for retired pay from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was assigned to the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG) as a unit armorer in the pay grade of E-5. On 7 April 1992, the applicant’s doctor provided a letter stating that the applicant should be discharged from the MIARNG because of an ongoing heart condition.

On 5 May 1992, the personnel office of the MIARNG stated, in a memorandum, that the MIARNG Surgeon had found the applicant not eligible for further military service. The applicant’s unit was directed to publish discharge orders effective 4 June 1992. Effective 4 June 1992, the applicant was discharged from the MIARNG under the authority of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200, paragraph 8-26y, as not meeting the medical retention standards of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. On 21 September 2000, the MIARNG revoked the discharge order and transferred him to the Retired Reserve effective 4 June 1992.

NGR 600-200, chapter 8, provides the discharge policy for Army National Guard (ARNG) soldiers. Paragraph 8-26y provides for the discharge of ARNG soldiers who are found to be medically unfit for retention and whose medical condition was not incurred or aggravated during an active duty period.

Army Regulation 135-178 provides the policy for separating ARNG and Army Reserve soldiers. Chapter 12 of the regulation states that separation will be accomplished when it is determined that an enlisted soldier is no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness.

Army Regulation 40-501 provides the standards of medical fitness for retention of active and Reserve Component soldiers. Basically, members with conditions as severe as listed in this chapter are considered medically unfit for retention in an active status.


Army Regulation 635-40 provides the policy for the disability processing of Reserve Component soldiers. Chapter 8 of the regulation specifies that only those soldiers who incur a disease or injury while performing inactive or active duty training will be processed for physical disability separation or retirement.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12731a provides the temporary special retirement qualification authority for the Reserve Component. The period of this special temporary retirement authority to assist in the downsizing or the Reserve Components began on 23 October 1992, the date of the passage of the first relevant Public Law, and ended on 1 October 1999. On 5 October 1995, it was modified to include members who no longer met the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member was unfit because of physical disability and they had completed at least 15 years of qualifying service for retirement.

A 7 November 1995 memorandum from the OTJAG to the NGB provided legal review comments on the NGB implementing instructions for section 12731a(c)(3). The legal review noted that there would be no prohibition to providing eligibility for this program change to those soldiers who attained 15 years of qualifying service for retirement as of 1 October 1991.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was found to no longer meet the medical retention standards for continued service in the Reserve Components. He was originally discharged and later transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 4 June 1992.

2. He was not eligible for physical disability processing because there was no evidence that he incurred his heart disease while performing inactive or active duty training.

3. Notwithstanding that the applicant had completed 15 years of qualifying service for retirement at age 60, prior to 1 October 1991, he was separated from the Reserve Components 4 months prior to the passage of the law that might have allowed his early retirement. There was no error or injustice in his separation.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rw____ ___rb___ __kn____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058420
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011025
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19920604
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 135-178
DISCHARGE REASON A31.00
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 136.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012691

    Original file (20130012691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged. Paragraph 8-26y of National Guard Regulation 600-200, in effect at the time, provided for the discharge of Soldiers who were medically unfit for retention under the standards of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020386

    Original file (20110020386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was discharged from the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) due to permanent disability and was transferred to the Retired Reserve and issued a 15-year letter. The applicant states, in effect, that after serving over 17 years of service he was discharged from the MSARNG and the United States Army Reserve and was told that he had been medically discharged. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012788C070206

    Original file (20050012788C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the authority and reason for discharge on his NGB (National Guard Bureau) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be changed to show "medically retired" (retired by reason of physical disability). The applicant was honorably discharged from the TXARNG on 31 August 1997 under the provisions of NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-26j(1), medically unfit for retention standards of chapter 3, Army Regulation 40-501. It states that separation will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011255C071029

    Original file (20060011255C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    All the applicant's military service medical records are not available for the Board's review. The evidence of record shows that the applicant experienced a heart attack; however, there is no evidence he experienced this heart attack while performing active duty, active duty for training, or while participating in unit drill(s). The evidence shows the applicant underwent a physical examination for the purpose of determining his qualification for retention in the Army Reserve and in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091500C070212

    Original file (03091500C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Washington, D.C. PEB indicated that 10 U.S.C., Section 12731b provides that Soldiers with non-duty related medically disqualifying conditions who had at least 15 but less than 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement could request reassignment to the Retired Reserve with early qualification for Reserve Retired pay at age 60. Army Regulation 135-101 prescribes policy, procedures, and eligibility criteria for appointment in the Reserve Components of the Army for Army Medical Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003659

    Original file (20110003659.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant did not have 20 years of creditable service for eligibility to a non-regular retirement at the time he was separated from the ARNG in May 1992. Additional factors making a denial inequitable are: a. the applicant provided honorable service spanning a period of over 23 years, of which he is shown to have 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days of creditable service for retirement; b. the applicant had over 15 years of service as of 1 October 1991 and would have qualified under Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028629

    Original file (20100028629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was denied the option to transfer to another Army National Guard (ARNG) unit, the Individual Ready Reserve, and/or the Retired Reserve * his company commander was angry with him because he reenlisted a Soldier whom the company commander did not like * he recently learned that another Selected Reserve Soldier in similar circumstances was allowed to serve a couple more years so he could retire * he requested a medical board before his discharge, but he was never...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002887

    Original file (20120002887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a letter from the PRARNG IG, dated 8 October 1992, in which he was informed that his separation orders indicated he was separated due to not meeting medical retention standards and that his retirement points history only showed 8 years of creditable service for retirement. The available evidence shows the applicant was discharged on 31 March 1992 for failure to meet medical retention standards and that he had attained over 17 years of creditable service for retired pay at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015612

    Original file (20080015612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) by reason of medically unfit for retention be changed to a physical disability retirement. The applicant states he was discharged from the VAARNG as medically unfit for retention based on conditions he incurred while on active duty in Iraq. AR 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012664

    Original file (AR20080012664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-26y covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army, who are medically unfit for retention per AR 40-501. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...