| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Judy Blanchard-Miller | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUE STS: In effect, that his discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he had alcohol problems, he was getting a divorce and his wife did not want him in the Army.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 27 April 1972, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years. He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 05H10 (Morse Interceptor). The highest grade he achieved was pay grade E-3.
Between April and October 1973, the applicant accepted three nonjudicial punishments under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for two occasions of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 14 to19 March and from 17 to 23 July 1973 and for failure to repair. His punishment included forfeitures, restrictions, extra duty, and a reduction to pay grade E-1.
On 15 January 1974, while under the influence of alcohol and marijuana, the applicant attempted suicide by repeatedly cutting his left wrist with a razor blade. The applicant made a sworn statement in which he said that he cut his wrist because he was afraid that he would not get out of the Army and his wife had threatened to leave him, so he believed that he had no choice but to cut his wrist. A Line of Duty Investigation was conducted and determined that the injury was not in the line of duty.
On the same day, a psychiatric evaluation found that the applicant had a long history of poor impulse control, difficulties with authority and difficulty in sustaining himself at a given task or role. It was determined that he had a personality disorder that was not amenable to treatment in a military setting. It was also recommended that he be administrative separated from the Army. He was considered mentally and physically competent to participate in board proceedings.
On 21 January 1974, the applicant was found fit for retention.
On 1 February 1974, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant of being absent without leave from 9 to 13 August 1973 and from 15 October 1973 to 14 January 1974.
On 5 February 1974, after consulting with legal counsel the applicant voluntarily without any coercion requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant was advised of the effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Veterans Administration benefits. He was afforded the opportunity to submit a statement in his behalf. The applicant stated, in effect, that the reason why he wanted out of the military was because his wife would not live with him while he was in the Army and that she threatened to divorce him, if he did not get out of the military. The applicant further stated that after she left him that is when he started messing up. He tried to commit suicide because he could not live without his wife and child and if he lost them, he would have lost everything. He further stated that if he does not get out of the Army, he might crack-up and try to harm himself again or go AWOL. He concludes by stating that can not stay in the Army and keep his wife, so he wants out.
On 13 February 1974, the Commanding General approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 21 February 1974, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. He had completed 1 year, 6 months and 23 days of creditable active military service.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
3. While the Board is empathetic, the applicant's personal problems are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
4. Therefore, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jhl___ __mhm___ __kah___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058413 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010918 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UOTHC) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19740221 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200,Chapter10 . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.7000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009020
The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge to honorable and correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). On 22 July 1976, the applicant appeared in person before the ADRB and testified under oath that * he enlisted to better his education and or training to get some kind of training that he couldn't otherwise get or afford * he first started having problems in the service when he couldn't get an allotment for his wife * the entire time he was in Germany it...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010409
The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 29 September 1972 for 4 years. The commander stated the applicant's record of AWOL qualified him for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, also provided that a general discharge was a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021546
On 17 May 1971, he was convicted by a special court-martial of one specification each of being absent without leave (AWOL) during the following periods: * from on or about 26 October 1970 through on or about 29 November 1970 * from on or about 20 December 1970 through on or about 4 January 1971 * from on or about 13 January 1971 through on or about 17 March 1971 * from on or about 6 April 1971 through on or about 30 April 1971 He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for seventy-five...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01294
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that if his recommendation was approved, the applicant's separation would be characterized as honorable; however, he did recommend probation and rehabilitation. He served 11 years, 8 months and 12 days of active duty service. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068441C070402
On 6 March 1975, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant of being AWOL from 8 October 1974 to 28 February 1975. On 28 April 1975, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a UD. On 22 June 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001666
On 5 September 1974, the applicant was informed that charges had been preferred against him for absenting himself without authority from his unit on or about 26 November 1973 and remaining so absent until on or about 12 July 1974, an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. Also on 5 September 1974, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the Service under the provisions of chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009566
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he made a mistake but he was a good and honorable Soldier. On 9 April 1974, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085455C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. APPLICANT STATES : That he was told his UD would automatically be upgraded to that of an honorable discharge within 90 days of his separation date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083710C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record shows that on 10 September 1975, the applicant consulted with counsel and submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service. On his return from Vietnam, he was assigned to Fort Sill and was again assigned to run a supply room.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017212
The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions for the period ending 22 October 1979 be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 4 October 1979, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service due to his failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-31, and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). There is no...