| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. He also requests that two records of nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, be removed from his records. He requests that his DD Form 214 reflect his specialty title as a combat engineer and not as a woodchopper.
3. The applicant states that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal at Letterman General Hospital in 1968. He states that while he was a patient at Letterman he went home and was late in returning. He was given permission [to return late] on the phone, but apparently that permission was not documented. He states that he was a combat engineer and not a woodchopper.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered on active duty on 10 April 1967, completed training and in December 1967 was assigned to an engineer battalion in Vietnam. He was wounded in action on 9 January 1968 and was awarded the Purple Heart. On 7 February 1968 the applicant was reassigned to Letterman General Hospital as a patient.
5. On 8 June 1968 the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service for the period 7 December 1967 through 9 January 1968.
6. On 14 November 1968 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment for being AWOL from 9 November 1968 to 13 November 1968. On 28 February 1969 he received nonjudicial punishment for being AWOL from 19 February 1969 to 27 February 1969. On both occasions the applicant stated that he did not want a trial by court-martial. He did not submit any matters in extenuation, mitigation, or defense. He did not appeal the punishments given.
7. In March 1969 the applicant was transferred to Fort Ord, California as a light vehicle driver. On 11 February 1970 the applicant was arraigned, tried, and convicted by a summary court-martial of AWOL from 8 December 1969 to 8 January 1970.
8. The applicant was released from active duty on 22 May 1970 under honorable conditions. His specialty number and title on his DD Form 214 shows that his military occupational specialty ( MOS) was 12A1P and that he was a Pioneer. His related civilian occupation shows Woodchopper. The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal. He had 3 years of service and 43 days of lost time.
9. Army Regulation 27-10 provides policy for the administration of military justice. Chapter 3 provides that nonjudicial punishment is appropriate in all cases involving minor offenses in which nonpunitive measures are considered inadequate or inappropriate. It is a tool available to commanders to correct, educate and reform offenders whom the commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures; to preserve a member's record of service from unnecessary stigma by record of court-martial conviction; and to further military efficiency by disposing of minor offenses in a manner requiring fewer resources than trial by court-martial. The imposing commander is not bound by the formal courts-martial rules of evidence and may consider any matter, including unsworn statements the commander reasonably believes to be relevant to the case. Furthermore, whether to impose punishment and the nature of the punishment are the sole decisions of the imposing commander.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. That medal should be reflected on his DD Form 214.
2. As its name indicates, nonjudicial punishment is different from a trial by court-martial. A nonjudicial punishment hearing is a more informal proceeding where the rules of evidence need not be strictly applied. Before he elected to accept nonjudicial punishment the applicant was made aware of these differences and of his right to demand court-martial where he would receive the protection of the rules of evidence. Instead he chose to have the matter settled at nonjudicial punishment.
3. The NJP was imposed in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies. The punishment imposed was neither unjust nor disproportionate to the offense, and there is no evidence of any substantive violation of any of the applicant's rights.
4. The applicant accepted the nonjudicial punishments, did not offer any matters in extenuation, mitigation, or defense, and did not appeal the punishments. There is no evidence nor has the applicant submitted any to show that his absences from Letterman General Hospital were excused. Consequently, there is no reason to expunge the records of nonjudicial punishment from his file.
5. The applicant’s military occupational specialty reflected on his DD Form 214 was that of a pioneer, MOS 12A1P, an MOS title then in effect in the combat engineer career management field. His MOS and title are correct.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__RVO__ __RKS __ __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Raymond V. O’Connor__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058407 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011016 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | 100.05 |
| 3. | 126.04 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080243C070215
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel and provided that a soldier's service would be characterized based on the overall enlistment period and conduct. Further, the Board concludes the applicant's Vietnam service and the awards that he received appear to have formed the basis for award of a GD, given his repeated misconduct offenses which would have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003909
The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 2. A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007414
This program, known as the DOD Discharge Review Program (Special) (SDRP) required, in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary, that a discharge upgrade to either honorable or general be issued in the case of any individual who had either completed a normal tour of duty in Southeast Asia, been wounded in action, been awarded a military decoration other than a service medal, had received an honorable discharge from a previous period of service, or had a record of satisfactory...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018191
This pamphlet shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, was cited for the following awards and decorations: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 July 1968 through 13 November 1968, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 31, dated 1969 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), for the period 1 January 1969 through 30 June 1969, by DAGO Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005009
The applicant states he served as an infantryman in Vietnam, lost his leg, and was awarded the Purple Heart; however, he did not receive the CIB. On 29 September 1969, he was again transferred to Vietnam for assignment to HHC, 1st Battalion, 52nd Infantry Regiment as a light weapons infantryman. The applicant was serving in an aviation unit at the time he was wounded.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000134
While in Germany, he was honorably discharged on 1 November 1967 for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the Regular Army. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. He served a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 May 1969 should be corrected to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002530
During its original review of the case, the Board determined the applicant's available record did not show and he did not provide conclusive evidence to show that his wounds were the result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wounds by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter official record. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018002
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 23 September 1969 to 22 September 1970; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003389C070206
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 18 June 1970, the date of his discharge from the United States Army. The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders or evidence that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 26th Engineer Battalion, the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005324
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the applicant contends that his MOS does not show he finished jump school (i.e., parachutist qualified), evidence of record shows he was awarded MOS 12A1P (parachutist qualified) in March 1966 which is properly shown in item 23a on his DD Form 214.