| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was a troubled young man who had never used drugs and alcohol before entering the Army. He states that his wife was sent overseas and it became difficult for him to perform his duties as a soldier. He further states that the Army shares some responsibility for taking his wife away from him and his drug addiction.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 20 January 1976, he enlisted in the Army for 3 years. He successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training at Fort Huachuca, Arizona and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 17K
(Ground Surveillance Radar Crewman).
The applicant’s record shows that the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3 and that during his active duty tenure he accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP) on six separate occasions as follows: 18 September 1976, for failing to obey a lawful general regulation: 2 September 1976, for possession of marihuana; 16 September 1976, failure to obey a general regulation; 3 December 1976, for being incapacitated to perform his duties and destruction of government property; 15 December 1976, for being drunk and disorderly; 6 May 1997, for striking a airman with his fist; and 16 September 1977, for disobeying the lawful order of a noncommissioned officer (NCO).
On 2 August 1978, the applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) and remained away for 9 days, until returning to military authorities on 10 August 1978. He again went AWOL on 5 September 1978, and remained away for
98 days, until returning to military control at the Personnel Control Facility, Fort Bragg, North Carolina on 11 December 1978.
On 27 December 1978, a court-martial charge was preferred against the applicant for his AWOL period from 5 September to 11 December 1978. After consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army for the good of the service in lieu of trial by
court-martial.
On 9 January 1979, the applicant’s request for separation was approved by the appropriate authority. On 18 January 1979, he was discharged, under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time of his discharge, the applicant had completed a total of 2 years, 8 months, and 13 days of creditable active military service and had accrued 107 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after court-martial charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the contention of the applicant that the separation from his wife hindered his ability serve and that the Army bears some responsibility for his drug and alcohol use but finds these factors are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade to his discharge.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. In connection with such a discharge, he was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge and after consulting counsel, voluntarily requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he admitted guilt to the stipulated offenses under the UCMJ.
3. The Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process and that the characterization of his service is commensurate with his overall record of service.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS__ __ MVT __ __WDP__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058062 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/07/24 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UOTHC) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200. . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | In Lieu of Trial By Court-Martial |
| BOARD DECISION | ( DENY, ) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 23.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072376C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. He enlisted at age 17 on 4 November 1975, for a period of 3 years, training as an infantry indirect fire crewman and assignment to Fort Carson.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013278
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 27 April 1979, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate (DD Form 794A). On 4 May 1979. the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057770C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086708C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, his DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged on 20 October 1978 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and was issued an under other...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009411C080407
An UOTHC discharge normally is appropriate for a Soldier who is discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial; however, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an UD. However, it does confirm he was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge, and that he voluntarily requested discharge to avoid a court-martial that could have resulted in his receiving a punitive discharge. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007165C080213
On 29 October 1979, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001471
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 December 1978, consistent with the chain of command's recommendations and after a legal review for sufficiency, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for voluntary discharge for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by a court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed that he be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade with the issuance of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012079
On 7 July 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Chapter 10 states that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate at the time of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020374
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to an honorable discharge. On 5 December 1984 after considering all of the available evidence, the ADRB determined that the applicant's discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062839C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 31 July 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. He submitted a request for discharge after being AWOL from August until October 1978 and the records fail to show that he ever stated that his father’s death was the reason for any of his absences.