Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057924C070420
Original file (2001057924C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057924

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the Army repay his student loans under the Loan Repayment Program (LRP).

APPLICANT STATES: That he joined the Army to be a 19D (Scout) with the incentives of a cash bonus and the Army LRP. He contends that he has two loans, a Stafford and a CitiAssist. He states that it is his understanding that the Army will pay 1/3 of his loan for each year he completes in service. Before he enlisted into the Army he was guaranteed payments on these loans. One year later, after processing his LRP applications, the Stafford loan was approved for payment and the CitiAssist loan was not because it was a Private Loan. In support of his application, he submits his enlistment contract; loan information; and proof that the CitiAssist loan was used for educational purposes.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 20 August 1998 the applicant applied for and received a student loan (CitiAssist) for educational purposes. There is no evidence in the available records which shows this loan was made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV, Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

In August 1999 the applicant applied for and received a student loan (Federal Stafford) for educational purposes. This loan was guaranteed under the Higher Education Act of 1965.

The applicant entered the delayed entry program on 3 November 1999. His DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment) shows that he enlisted for the U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (Cash Bonus ($8000) and LRP). His DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding) shows he enlisted for the U.S. Army Cash Bonus ($8000) and the LRP. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 December 1999 for a period of 4 years.

At the time the applicant submitted his application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, he was serving on active duty in pay grade E-3. The applicant also stated that he is scheduled to be discharged on
29 December 2003.

In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Education Incentives Branch, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command. That office recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request.

The opinion points out that the applicant’s DA Form 3286-66, Section 4, item a states “I understand that under this program (LPR) that the government will repay a designated portion of any loan I incurred that was made, insured or guaranteed under Part B of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Guaranteed Student Loan) or any loan under Part E of such act (National Direct Student Loan) after 1 October 1975 and before I enlist into the Regular Army”. In addition, Public Law 99-145, Section 671(a)(1) confirms loans eligible for repayment must be made under Title IV, Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

The advisory opinion further states that based on documentation provided, the applicant’s CitiAssist loan does not qualify for repayment under the LRP. This is a Private Loan that is not made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV, Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965. There are no exceptions to the law; therefore, payment cannot be made toward his student loan. The applicant borrowed money for his education and then joined the Army to have his qualifying loans repaid. As of 31 July 2001, this office has not received a DD Form 2475 (DoD Educational Loan Repayment Program Annual Application) for the applicant’s Stafford loan.

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and possible rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.

The Loan Repayment Program is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Public Law 99-145. This option is designed to increase Test Score Category I-IIIA accessions. Loans that qualify for repayment are Guaranteed Student Loan/Stafford Loans, National Direct Student Loan/Perkins Loans, William D. Ford Loans, Supplemental Loans for Students, Federally Insured Student Loans (FISL), Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students (PLUS), Auxiliary Loan Assistance for Students (ALAS) and consolidated loans which fall under Title IV, Part B, D or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Active Army LRP participants earn their first loan repayment after completion of a full year of active duty and for each full year thereafter, up to 3 years. Payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500, whichever is greater, is authorized annually to the loan holder on the total remaining original outstanding principal balance.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. The applicant did enlist for the Loan Repayment Program. However, evidence of record shows that the applicant’s CitiAssist student loan was not made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV, Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Therefore, payment cannot be made toward this student loan.

2. Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s Stafford loan was guaranteed under the Higher Education Act of 1965. However, the Chief, Education Incentives and Counseling Branch indicated that his office has not received a DD Form 2475 (DoD Educational Loan Repayment Program Annual Application) for the applicant’s Stafford loan as of 31 July 2001. Therefore, payment cannot be made toward this student loan until the applicant implements the necessary enrollment procedures.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

MKP____ KAK_____ RTD____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057924
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011002
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 112.1200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086767C070212

    Original file (2003086767C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted for the Loan Repayment Program incentive. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show her DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000162

    Original file (20070000162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted for the LRP incentive up to $65,000. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his enlistment contract was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP, and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068523C070402

    Original file (2002068523C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, he submits a letter, dated 17 December 2001, from the Chief, Education Incentives and Counseling Branch; an application for a 1999-2000 student loan, dated 12 January 1999; and a DD Form 2475 (DOD Educational Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Annual Application, dated 20 November 2001. The applicant’s DA Form 3286-66, Section 4, item a states “I understand that under this program (LRP) that the government will repay a designated portion of any loan I incurred that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005992C070206

    Original file (20050005992C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) does not identify what student loans he had other than to state he was authorized the LRP. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the Government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001889C070208

    Original file (20040001889C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was not properly informed or counseled on which loans qualified for payment under the loan repayment program (LRP). That form contained a number of statements, to include, "If the incentive … is for the … LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM (LRP), I understand that I must disenroll from the GI Bill in order to qualify for the program … If I fail to complete the disenrollment portion of the DD Form 2366, I will not be eligible for the LRP and will become automatically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086145C070212

    Original file (2003086145C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. That form contained a number of statements, to include, "If the incentive … is for the … LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM (LRP), I understand that I must DISENROLL from the GI Bill in order to qualify for the program.…If I fail to complete the disenrollment portion of the DD Form 2366, I will not be eligible for the LRP and will become automatically enrolled in the GI Bill," and, "I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010505C070208

    Original file (20040010505C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. Further, the record gives no indication that an Army Guidance Counselor ever verified that the applicant’s loan did or did not qualify for repayment under the LRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: amending the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063819C070421

    Original file (2001063819C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071360C070402

    Original file (2002071360C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Loans that qualify for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088486C070403

    Original file (2003088486C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: As part of the applicant’s enlistment processing he signed a Department of the Army Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program) indicating that he understood “that under this program (LRP) that the government will repay a designated portion of any loan I incurred that was made, insured or guaranteed, under Part B of the Higher Education Action of 1965 (Guaranteed Student Loan) or any loan under Part E...