Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057814C070420
Original file (2001057814C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
.

        

         BOARD DATE: 5 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057814


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Rosa M. Chandler Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. June Hajjar Chairperson
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member
Mr. Roger W. Able Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his commissioning date and date of rank as a second lieutenant be adjusted from 8 January 2000 to the date of his graduation from the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Officer Candidate School (OCS) on 7 August 1999.

3. The applicant states that he graduated from OCS on 7 August 1999, however, he was not commissioned until 8 January 2000 because the pre-OCS physical examination that he received from TXARNG Camp Mabry was not accepted and, due to being actively involved in OCS training, a new physical examination could not be rescheduled until 8 September 1999, a month after his OCS class graduated and was commissioned on 7 August 1999. In support of his request, the applicant provided: Standard Forms 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 11 April 1999 and 8 September 1999; Orders Number 013-242, State of Texas Adjutant General's Department, Austin, Texas, appointing him a second lieutenant effective 8 January 2000; and a 27 November 2001 memorandum from B Company (OCS), 136th Regiment (Combat Arms), TXARNG, supporting his request to adjust his date of rank to 7 August 1999.

4. The applicant’s military records show that, prior to the period of service under review, he honorably completed 5 years, 11 months, and 24 days of active military service. He achieved the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5.

5. The evidence available shows that, on 11 April 1999, the applicant received a medical examination at Camp Mabry, Texas; that he entered the TXARNG OCS program and completed same on 7 August 1999; and that, on 8 September 1999, the applicant received a second medical examination from the Military Enlistment Processing Station (MEPS), San Antonio, Texas. He was subsequently appointed a second lieutenant effective 8 January 2000; the reason for any delay beyond 8 September 1999 is unknown.

6. The 27 November 2001 memorandum from the TXARNG OCS program supports the applicant's contention that he completed the OCS program for the State of Texas on 7 August 1999, but was not commissioned on 7 August 1999 with the rest of his class due to an invalid medical examination [the examination was performed by a TXARNG facility and not an active duty installation.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was denied the opportunity to be commissioned on 7 August 1999 due to an invalid medical examination that appears to have been the result of misinformation at the time the examination was given. The applicant should


have been informed of the requirement for a medical examination from an active duty facility when he originally scheduled his examination. Furthermore, he should have been advised in a timely manner that his 11 April 1999 examination was invalid and provided the opportunity to obtain a valid examination well enough in advance of his graduation to enable him to be commissioned with his class.

2. The applicant completed the commissioning course offered by the TXARNG OCS program on 7 August 1999. Through no fault of the applicant, he was not commissioned with his classmates on 7 August 1999 and had to wait until 8 January 2000. It is unjust that his career in the ARNG will not progress at the same time frame as his OCS classmates.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by adjusting the date of rank of the individual concerned to show that he was appointed a second lieutenant in the TXARNG effective 7 August 1999.

BOARD VOTE:

__JH ___ __KAK__ ___RWA_ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __ _June Hajjar____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057814
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020205
TYPE OF DISCHARGE NA
DATE OF DISCHARGE NA
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON N/A
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053276C070420

    Original file (2001053276C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 January 2001, a lieutenant colonel (LTC) security manager for the TXARNG, recommended in a memorandum to the United States Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM), that any of the applicant’s requests that were based on his failure to obtain a security clearance in a timely manner be granted and that the applicant’s appointment date be reestablished as 12 September 1998. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant was unfairly denied the opportunity to be commissioned with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003054C070206

    Original file (20050003054C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant was originally appointed as a second lieutenant with a date of rank of 8 January 2000 and, based on the required completion of 2 MTIG, and any OBC, he was promoted to first lieutenant effective 10 January 2002. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he was promoted to first lieutenant effective 6 August 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018261C070206

    Original file (20050018261C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides documentation on another Soldier who graduated in March 2003, from the same OCS Course M01 on 7 March 2003, was order to active duty in support of Operation Noble Eagle, as was the applicant, however the other Soldier was appointed as a second lieutenant on 7 March 2003 the day they graduated from OCS, and was promoted to first lieutenant on 7 March 2005. In the processing of this case an Advisory Opinion was obtained from the Department of the Army, National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015100

    Original file (20090015100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015100 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In ABCMR Docket Number AR2003096515, the Board recommended and the secretarial authority approved correction of his records to show that a 1 August 2000 request for a waiver was approved and that the applicant be considered by an SSB for promotion to CPT. The advisory official noted that following the last ABCMR case and selection by an SSB the applicant's DOR and effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011384

    Original file (20080011384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). NGR 600-100, paragraph 2-13, states that temporary Federal Recognition may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by a Federal Recognition Board pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005302

    Original file (20120005302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) appointment orders, OCS completion certificate, NGB civil conviction waiver, NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office), DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel), DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), and several email messages. The Soldier submitted a request for a waiver regarding his civil conviction but evidence has not been provided to show when the waiver request was submitted. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020105

    Original file (20080020105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, the Chief, Personnel Division, states that applicants must have a final security clearance prior to appointment or reappointment as commissioned officers in the Army National Guard. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show he was awarded Federal Recognition for promotion to the rank of first lieutenant, effective 7 March 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020079

    Original file (20080020079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided as new evidence in support of this reconsideration a signed Oath of Office dated 16 April 2005 granting him temporary Federal recognition as a 2LT and TXARNG Orders Number 285-1082 appointing him in the TXARNG effective 16 April 2005. There is no evidence the applicant received permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment as a 2LT from the NGB within the 6-month period following the Oaths of Office dated 16 April 2005 or 3 May 2006 as required by U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015690

    Original file (20100015690.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the following: * Her request should be granted based on abuse of authority * In February 2003, she applied for officer candidate school (OCS), was boarded, and was selected for accelerated State OCS * She was placed as number 1 on the order of merit list (OML) for OCS attendance * She was improperly removed from the OML by colonel (COL) S****, her superior officer at the time 3. On 10 January 2007, the TXARNG published Orders 010-1008 promoting her to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018070

    Original file (20080018070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states that the applicant timely completed the APFT on 4 December 1999. It is noted that, during the applicant's counseling session with the AMEDD OBC Program Director, he was advised that upon submission of a true copy of the record to the AMEDD Center and School showing a passing score on the APFT, his academic record would be revised to reflect his successful completion of the AMEDD OBC. Additionally, the applicant did not submit a verified copy of the DA Form 705 to the...