| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Eric N. Andersen | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge in lieu of court-martial for the good of the service be reviewed.
APPLICANT STATES: That he suffered from a mental condition while he was in the Army of which he was unaware.
In support of his application he submits two psychiatric evaluations, one in which he is diagnosed as suffering from a mood disorder due to a childhood head trauma, the other in which he is diagnosed as suffering from mood disorder with homicidal thoughts, relational problems, and polysubstance dependence in reported full-sustained remission. These evaluations are dated 14 and 20 June 2000, respectively.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 June 1973 and was awarded the military occupational specialty of motor transportation operator.
On 16 April 1974 the applicant, then serving in pay grade E-3, accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, for going from his appointed place of duty as door guard, and for being disrespectful towards a senior noncommissioned officer.
On 24 April 1974 court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for leaving his post during guard duty, and for failure to go at the time prescribed to perform extra duty.
On 8 May 1974 the applicant requested discharge in lieu of court-martial for the good of the service.
On 20 June 1974 the applicant was given a separation physical examination and was found to be qualified for separation without any physical profile limitations.
That request was accepted and he was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate on 25 July 1974.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention or Separation), paragraph 4-3, provides that an enlisted soldier whom is the subject of elimination action that might result in a discharge under other than honorable conditions may not be processed for medical retirement or discharge.
The Manual for Courts-Martial, R.C.M. 916, provides that it is an affirmative defense to any offense that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the accused, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his or her acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense. The accused is presumed to have been mentally responsible at the time of the alleged offense. This presumption continues until the accused establishes, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she was not mentally responsible at the time of the alleged offense.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence that the medical conditions for which the applicant was treated in June 2000 existed when he was discharged from the Army in July 1974. There is almost a 26 year separation between the applicant’s discharge and his psychiatric evaluations.
2. However, even if there was evidence to show that the applicant suffered from a mental condition while he was in the service, it would not negate the appropriateness of his discharge. Since there is no indication that the applicant was insane at the time his committed his court-martial offenses, he could not be processed within the disability evaluation system.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo____ ___teo __ ___ena _ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010927 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055784C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for DVA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061611C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 29 August 1967, the applicant was evaluated by a military psychiatrist.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086867C070212
On 7 December 1970, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge. There is no evidence of record or evidence presented by the applicant which indicates procedural errors which would jeopardize the applicant's rights. The applicant has failed to show evidence that he experienced readjustment problems or PTSD during his period of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606788C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge or better. When the VA discovered that the applicant had received an undesirable discharge, that he had fraudulently altered his DD Form 214, it severed service connection for his disability and stopped his educational benefits, retroactive to the dates both those benefits were granted. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076652C070215
An Army psychiatrist at the Fort Campbell US Army Hospital stipulated the applicant was medically qualified to return to duty, but also recommended he not be exposed to further combat and that he be restricted to assignments within the United States not involving basic combat training. On 27 January 1989, the VA found the applicant to be 100 percent disabled due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the processing of this case, a medical advisory opinion was obtained from the United...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090689C070212
The applicant states that he served in combat, was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and several other awards. The applicant is requesting correction of injustice which occurred on 10 January 1973, the date of his discharge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that while the applicant was assigned to Vietnam he participated in two campaigns.
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2002-061
She stated, "after I got arrested I felt down, but I continued taking Celexa and the depression quickly went away." The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant requested discharge under Article 12.B.21 of the Personnel Manual, which provides that an enlisted member, who has an assigned lawyer, may request a discharge under other than honorable conditions for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial if punishment for alleged misconduct could result in a punitive discharge or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059305C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s medical records show that he was first seen in June 1994 for a medical condition that was diagnosed as sarcoidosis. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088979C070403
The applicant states that his original statement documented a long history of childhood trauma and that he has conducted some additional research regarding Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In conclusion, the counselor requests that the applicant's discharge be upgraded and that he be restored to society as an honorable member of the military family. While PTSD was not recognized as a specific illness at the time of the applicant’s separation from the service, the fact that an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012768
The Board also noted the applicant requested discharge. However, there is no evidence or indication that the applicant suffered from PTSD when he went AWOL or requested discharge. Since there is no evidence that the applicant suffered from PTSD when he requested discharge, there is no basis for upgrading his discharge.