Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057216C070420
Original file (2001057216C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 18 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057216

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the requirement for his entitlement to the Overseas Service Ribbon be waived and that his records be corrected to show his entitlement to marksmanship awards for the M-60, 9mm, M203 and M2 weapons qualification.

APPLICANT STATES: That although he was assigned to Germany for a 3-year accompanied tour, he only completed 1 year, 5 months and 11 days of his tour. He further states that he did not complete his tour because he was discharged due to a number of family difficulties he was experiencing. He goes on to state that while his separation document (DD Form 214) indicates that he was discharged for misconduct, he believes that it was more of a hardship discharge.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted on 10 July 1992 for a period of 3 years, training as a wheel vehicle mechanic and participation in the Army Incentive Enlistment Program. He completed his training and was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas.

He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 November 1994 and reenlisted on 30 March 1995 for a period of 3 years. He remained at Fort Riley until 24 April 1996 when he was transferred to Germany.

On 20 August 1997 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-3, a forfeiture of pay (both suspended for 6 months) and extra duty.

On 25 September 1997, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for a pattern of misconduct. He cited as the basis for his recommendation the applicant’s record of NJP and his failure to respond to numerous counseling sessions regarding his failure to go to his place of duty, lying to noncommissioned officers, failure to obey lawful orders, failure to repair, failure to follow orders, repeated failure to pay his just debts, unsatisfactory performance, enrollment in the overweight program, being disrespectful to noncommissioned officers, failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test, and missing scheduled appointments. The commander recommended that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.

The applicant declined the opportunity to consult with counsel and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be furnished a General Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 4 October 1997, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b for misconduct. He had served 5 years, 2 months and 25 days of total active service and was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Rifle M-16) and the Driver and Mechanic Badge.

There is no indication that he has applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge.

There is also no indication in the applicant’s records that he was ever qualified with the M-60, 9mm, M203 or M2 weapons. He completed 1 year, 5 months and 11 days of foreign service in Germany and was not credited with a complete foreign service tour.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides the criteria for award of the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). It provides, in pertinent part, that the OSR is awarded for successful completion of overseas tours. Soldiers must be credited with a normal tour completion in order to be awarded the OSR.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant did not receive credit for completion of his overseas tour and therefore is not entitled to the award of the OSR. There is also no indication that he qualified in the weapons he claims; therefore, there is no basis to award him those badges as well.

3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions; however, regardless of the circumstances surrounding his discharge, there is no basis to award him the OSR for a tour that he did not complete.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jhl___ ___kah __ __mm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057216
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2001/09/18
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 125 105.0100/OSR
2. 156 107.0110/MARKSMANSHIP BADGES
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020583

    Original file (20100020583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of her service record revealed: * award certificate, dated 25 January 1991, which shows she was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service from 24 January 1990 to 7 January 1991 by Orders 83-04 * no recommendation or orders for a second award of the Army Achievement Medal * no disciplinary actions or evidence which shows she was disqualified by her chain of command for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * no evidence which shows she qualified as expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017667

    Original file (20090017667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018987

    Original file (20130018987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to add the Army Superior Unit Award and in item 18 (Remarks) to add his service in Kuwait, Korea, Bosnia, and Germany. His record shows he was awarded two awards of the Army Commendation Medal; however, only one award was listed on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002588

    Original file (20120002588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected by adding the Expert Grenade Badge (Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar) and Overseas Campaign Ribbon (Overseas Service Ribbon). The applicant states he earned the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar and should receive the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) for serving during the Vietnam era. The applicant’s request to add the Expert Grenade Badge and Overseas...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090958C070212

    Original file (2003090958C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Although the applicant had an infantry MOS and served in an infantry unit during Operation Desert Storm, there are no orders awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002097

    Original file (20110002097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110002097 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations & Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was awarded the: * Army Service Ribbon *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003328

    Original file (20090003328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: a. correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) to add military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator) 3 years and 4 months and MOS 11B (Infantryman) 3 years and 4 months; b. addition of awards of the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, the Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Marine Corps Reserve Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012149

    Original file (20090012149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM), Army Service Ribbon (ASR), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge. The commemorative medals requested by the applicant are not authorized Army awards or decorations and there are no regulatory provisions for their award or posting on military records. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010509

    Original file (20120010509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states the: a. NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. d. Marksmanship Qualification Badge is awarded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015197

    Original file (20130015197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of his awards, decorations, and badges, to include: * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Overseas Service Medal (Interpreted to mean the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR)) * Campaign Medal * Berlin Medal (Interpreted to mean the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM with Germany Clasp) for occupation of Berlin 2. The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 *...