Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057133C070420
Original file (2001057133C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057133

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Shirley L. Powell Chairperson
Mr. Allen L. Raub Member
Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he enlisted for the Army College Fund (ACF).

APPLICANT STATES: His primary reason for enlisting was to obtain college benefits. After he had selected his military occupational specialty (MOS) and began his enlistment process, he was told by his recruiter that he would receive both the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) and a $20,000.00 “kicker” for college. When he was initialing and signing his enlistment contract and addenda, he specifically asked why he was initialing “No” for the ACF. His recruiter told him that his “kicker” fell under a different incentive program. Based on that assurance, the applicant completed his enlistment contract and served his required service honorably. Now that he has completed his enlistment he has attempted to use his educational benefit “Kicker”, but has discovered that the “Kicker” was, in fact, the ACF. The applicant adds that since his test scores and MOS qualified for the ACF, he doesn’t understand why his recruiter lied to him.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 November 1996. At that time he completed enlistment contracts and addenda to elect the MOS of network switching systems operator/maintainer and the MGIB. At that time he signed a form which stated “I have read and understand the statements above and that these statements are intended to constitute ALL promises and guarantees whatsoever concerning my enlistment. No other (verbal or otherwise) promise or representation not annexed to my enlistment contract is valid or will be honored. I hereby state that I have NOT been promised anything other than what is written on this form and hereby waive any claim based upon any promise or representation not annexed to my contract.”

The applicant honorably completed his enlistment and was released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service on 18 November 2000.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant did not sign the addendum required for the ACF. As such, he is not entitled to that enlistment incentive.

2. The applicant has claimed that his MOS qualified for the ACF at the time of his enlistment and has claimed that his recruiter told him that he was entitled to the ACF. However, he has not submitted any evidence to support either of those allegations.

3. The applicant enlisted primarily for the training of choice enlistment option. He, himself, has stated that he chose his training before he was told he would receive the ACF. With that sequence of events, it would appear that the training for which the applicant was enlisting was a higher priority than the ACF at the time of his enlistment. Furthermore, he certified, by his signature, that he was not promised anything that wasn’t contained in his enlistment contract.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__alr ____ ____teo _ ___slp__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057133
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011023
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606453C070209

    Original file (9606453C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his enlistment contract be corrected to show that he selected the Army College Fund (ACF) enlistment option. When he enlisted in the Army Reserve he signed a DA Form 3286-59 series, Statement for Enlistment, US Army Enlistment Option, US Army Delayed Enlistment Program. When he enlisted in the Regular Army he signed a DA Form 3286-60 series, Statement for Enlistment, US Army Enlistment Options.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015274

    Original file (20100015274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Memorandum of Record from the Recruiting Retention Office, dated 8 March 2010 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Disapproval of the Request for an Exception to Policy for MGIB Kicker * Washington ARNG (WAARNG) request for exception to policy for the applicant * Unsigned Printout of SMOM 07-002, dated 6 October 2006 * NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4, Non-prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement) with Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140010783

    Original file (AR20140010783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show entitlement to the full amount of the Army College Fund (ACF) "kicker bonus" that he contracted for upon enlistment in the U.S. Army. The applicant states when he initially enlisted in the U.S. Army he contracted for the ACF in the amount of $33,000.00. The evidence of record also shows the applicant is being paid under the MGIB (Post-9/11 GI Bill) with the ACF "kicker"; however, the amount is capped at the level listed in the contract.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005403C070208

    Original file (20040005403C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 3286-66, paragraph 1a states that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $30,000." The applicant's DA Form 3286-66, paragraph 1a stated that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $30,000." The DVA informed the applicant that he would receive $35,460.00 in MGIB benefits plus $24,165.40 for his ACF benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010209C070208

    Original file (20040010209C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA Form 3286- 59 (Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program) states the applicant is enlisting under program 9A Army Training Enlistment Program and 9C Army Incentive Enlistment Program (ACF $26,500.00) and (Cash Bonus $8,000.00). The applicant's enlistment documents state that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $26,500." The advisory opinions admit that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007821

    Original file (20120007821.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show a valid contract for a $40,000 Army College Fund (ACF) kicker and payment of ACF education benefits. The available evidence partially supports the applicant's request for correction of his record to show a valid contract for a $40,000 ACF kicker and payment of this benefit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by preparing a DA Form 3286-66...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010031

    Original file (20060010031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Department of Veterans Affairs booklet, Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents, 2006 edition, states the Department of Veterans Affairs will pay $1,034 a month for training in college, technical, or vocational school to eligible veterans. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in February 1994, and there is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606928C070209

    Original file (9606928C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he enlisted for the Army College Fund (ACF). The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the DEP on 15 June 1990. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 November 1990 with the ACF enlistment option, as an exception to policy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023146

    Original file (20110023146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a copy of the DD Form 2366, dated 19 March 2003, that was previously considered; however, item 3 of the copy provided also shows the handwritten entry, "ACF $40,000.00 as per USAREC msg 03-033, dtg 142014Z March [2003]; and b. an Army reservation form, dated 19 March 2003, that shows a successful reservation was completed for the applicant to enlist in the RA for a period of 4 years for the following options: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000904

    Original file (20070000904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000904 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid the $30,000.00 Army College Fund (ACF) kicker. It stated that applicants for enlistment would be advised of the following: The ACF provided additional educational...