| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by increasing his disability rating.
APPLICANT STATES: That his medical condition continues to worsen and that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) continues to find complications from injuries brought on by the heat stroke he suffered on 23 May 1996.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 August 1996.
There are no medical records in the applicant’s available records. However, his discharge orders dated 22 March 1999, indicate he received a disability rating of 10 percent and was authorized a disability separation with severance pay based on the pay grade of E-4 with 3 years and 23 days of military service.
His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicates he was discharged on 21 April 1999, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(3), physical disability with severance pay. The applicant had a total of 3 years and 23 days of creditable service and received $7959.60 in severance pay.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.
Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service. However, an award of a higher VA rating does not establish error or injustice in the Army rating. An Army disability rating is intended to compensate an individual for interruption of a military career after it has been determined that the individual suffers from an impairment that disqualifies him or her from further military service. The VA, which has neither the authority nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individual's employability.
Accordingly, it is not unusual for the two agencies of the Government, operating under different policies, to arrive at a different disability rating based on the same impairment. Furthermore, unlike the Army the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his or her lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant's disability was properly rated in accordance with the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, and that his separation with severance pay was in compliance with law and regulation.
2. Rating action by the VA does not necessarily demonstrate any error or injustice in the Army rating. The VA, operating under its own policies and regulations, assigns disability ratings as it sees fit, and can adjust an individual's ratings as it deems appropriate.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence to show that there was an error or injustice in this case.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__WTM _ __AAO__ __CLG __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001057130 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011101 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062151C070421
When provided the same evidence submitted to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for the same time period, the VA in July 2000 determined that he receive a 40 percent rating for his left arm with an overall rating of 50 percent. It is a fact finding board to investigate the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the disability of soldiers who are referred to the board; to evaluate the physical condition of the soldier against the physical requirements of the soldier’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079326C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Subsequent to her separation, the Department of Veterans Affairs granted the applicant a 30 percent disability rating for her chronic pelvic pain and July 2002 granted her a 30 percent disability rating for “major depression.” Her combined disability rating currently stands at 50 percent. The Board notes that the applicant concurred with the findings of both the MEB and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067037C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he received a VA disability rating for "depression" which was not addressed in his Army disability rating. Subsequent to the applicant's separation, in October 2001, the VA granted him a disability rating of 30 percent for "anxiety disorder with depressive features" and a 20 percent rating for "status post-retinal detachment, left eye,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065372C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Although the applicant's service medical records were not available to the Board, a narrative summary, completed in December 1999 as part of a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), indicated the applicant's chief medical complaint was "neck and back pain." Subsequent to the applicant's separation, in June 2001, the VA granted the applicant a combined disability rating of 60...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098535C070212
The applicant states that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded him a 70 percent disability rating for the same medical conditions for which the Army awarded him a 10 percent rating. On 13 October 2000 the VA awarded the applicant a 40 percent disability rating for myofascial pain syndrome (claimed as low back pain, bilateral foot pain, and vertigo like symptoms), a 10 percent rating for residuals of a fracture of his distal right ulna with right wrist pain, and a 20 percent...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104982C070208
The applicant's medical records, to include the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings are not available. The rating action by the VA does not show that the applicant has been awarded a 70 percent disability rating. The applicant does not dispute the disability rating awarded by the Army or his discharge with severance pay on 16 May 2003, but contends only that he should be medically retired because of an increase by the VA in his disability rating.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106594C070208
The applicant’s medical records are not available to the Board. The VA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individual’s civilian employability. The Army must find a member physically unfit before he can be medically retired or separated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011646C070208
He notes the rating was effective on 28 March 1995 and the medical conditions which served as the basis for his VA disability rating were related to his military service. According to the applicant's VA rating documents, in March 1995 he was granted a combined disability rating of 30 percent. The evidence of record indicates he did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073551C070403
On 17 December 1997 the VA awarded the applicant a 10 percent service connected disability rating for left ankle sprain; 10 percent for right ankle sprain; 20 percent for L5-S1 diskectomy; 10 percent for hemorrhoids; and zero percent for right retropatellar pain, left retropatellar pain, scar on right thigh, head injury residuals, residuals of an injury to his left middle finger, and residuals of an injury to his right hand. Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001282C070206
The applicant states he was given only a 10 percent rating for his left knee condition by the Army and was subsequently awarded a 30 percent rating for that same condition by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The PEB noted that none of the secondary medical conditions identified by the MEB were unfitting and therefore were not rated. However, an award of a VA rating does not establish an error or injustice in the separation or discharge of an individual from the Army not as a result of...