| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Beverly A. Young | Analyst |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general under honorable conditions discharge be changed to a medical discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was treated at the 8th Field Hospital for a suicide attempt and that his medical discharge summary shows his diagnosis as “psychoneurotic disorder, chronic”. He provides a copy of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), his Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision, and a physician’s note, dated 1 December 1999 in support of his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 December 1966 for a period of three years. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and served in Germany from 23 May 1967 through 29 January 1968 as an engineer equipment mechanic. He reenlisted on 10 January 1968 for a period of three years. He later was reclassified as a wheel vehicle mechanic and served in Vietnam from 12 March 1968 through 11 March 1969 and from 18 December 1969 through 17 December 1970.
On 4 August 1969 and 16 February 1970, the applicant was punished under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failing to go to his appointed place of duty, for failing to obey a lawful order and for wrongfully appropriating a military vehicle.
On 24 April 1970, the applicant underwent a psychiatric examination which indicated that he had an emotionally unstable personality, chronic, moderate, manifested by anxiety, barbiturate dependence, difficulty with officers and noncommissioned officers, and excessive visits to sick call. The applicant was found to be mentally responsible, able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right, and had the mental capacity to understand and participate in board proceedings. The psychiatrist cleared the applicant for any administrative action, to include separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212.
On 25 June 1970, the applicant’s unit commander notified him of pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unsuitability with an undesirable discharge. He cited as a basis for his recommendation as the applicant’s unwillingness to accomplish any task to which assigned; his provocation of incidents with his superiors and men; and his innate unwillingness to accept authority of any kind. On 29 June 1970, the applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf.
The complete facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge proceedings are not present in his personnel records. However, his DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged on 15 July 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unsuitability – apathy, defective attitudes and inability to expend effort constructively and was issued a general under honorable conditions discharge. He had 2 years, 6 months 6 days of creditable service on his current enlistment and 3 years, 6 months and 19 days total active military service.
The applicant provided a copy of Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), 30 June 1970, which shows he had been treated for a chronic psychoneurotic disorder. At that time, he was found to be medically qualified for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212.
There is no evidence of any medical condition which rendered the applicant medically unfit for retention on active duty.
Army Regulation 635-212, then in effect, set forth the policy and procedures for administrative separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness and unsuitability. It provided, in pertinent part, for discharge due to unsuitability because of apathy of those individuals who displayed a lack of appropriate interest and/or an inability to expend effort constructively. When separation for unsuitability was warranted an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's entire record.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board considered the applicant’s contentions that he was treated at the 8th Field Hospital for a suicide attempt and was diagnosed with “psychoneurotic disorder, chronic”.
2. However, there are no medical records which indicate any medical condition incurred that would render the applicant medically unfit. At the time of the separation physical examination, competent medical authority determined that the applicant was then medically fit for appropriate separation. Accordingly, the applicant was separated from active duty for reasons other than physical disability.
3. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
4. Therefore, the type of discharge directed and the reasons for his separation were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
MKP____ TBR_____ RKS____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056900 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010807 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19700715 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Unsuitability |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009399
On 26 November 1969, the applicant's commander initiated a request to discharge the applicant for unsuitability under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability). There is no evidence that shows he was diagnosed with PTSD or any mental condition prior to his discharge sufficient to warrant disposition through medical channels. Although the applicant contends he should have been given a medical discharge, the evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019710
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing that his general under honorable conditions characterization of service was upgraded to honorable. There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005395
The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing that his general under honorable conditions characterization of service was upgraded to honorable. There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by showing his general under honorable conditions characterization of service was upgraded to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001480
The applicant requests: a. award of the Purple Heart; b. his rank be reinstated to specialist four (SP4)/E-4; and c. his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. His DD Form 214 shows: * he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 September 1967 for a period of 3 years * his military occupational specialty was 11B (light weapons infantryman) * he served in Vietnam from 14 June 1969 to 13 June 1970 * in item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) PV (private) * in item 5b (Pay Grade) E1 * he has 196 days of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013984
On 1 February 1971, the separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of AR 635-212 by reason of unsuitability and directed the applicant be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029108
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to a fully honorable discharge. On 9 September 1969, the unit chaplain indicated he consulted with the applicant and he believed the applicant was unsuitable for military service due to his inability to adjust to the military life. When separation for unsuitability was warranted, an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's entire record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001241
COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 25 March 1970, while in Vietnam, the applicant was evaluated by a psychiatrist. Since there is insufficient evidence of record to show that the applicant's medical condition was medically unfitting for retention at the time in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, there was no basis for medical separation or retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027644
However, he now believes he should have been granted a medical discharge in 1971 and the administrative action taken by his unit commanders under Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability) for unfitness/unsuitability was based on incomplete evidence. He also believes his case may fall under Civil Action Number 77-0904 of 27 November 1979 referenced in Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), paragraph 4-1a, since...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016895
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1 The applicant requests, in three separate applications, award of the Purple Heart (PH) and upgrade of his general discharge (GD) to an honorable discharge (HD). There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007677
The unit commander initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability), paragraph 6b(3) for unsuitability due to apathy, defective attitude, or inability to expend effort constructively. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel...