| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. John H. Kern | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) in a timely manner.
3. The applicant states that he qualified for his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20 year letter) in the spring of 2000 but did not receive it until April 2001. The Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) told him they had mailed the 20 year letter in April 2000 so by the time he sent them the Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, he was outside the 90-day window.
4. The applicant’s military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
5. The applicant’s 20-year letter is dated 6 April 2000. AR-PERSCOM has stated that they mailed the letter to his Alabama address in April 2000. The applicant states he did not receive this letter while he was in Alabama. He was reassigned to Oklahoma in September 2000. He asked his new unit administrator to check on his 20-year letter. It was not until April 2001 that his unit administrator was able to obtain his 20-year letter. On 31 May 2001, he completed a DD Form 1883, enrolling in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, option C, full base amount.
6. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.
7. In an earlier case, AR-PERSCOM informed the Board that due to budget cuts they now use First Class mail, rather than registered or certified mail, to mail 20-year letters
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board finds it reasonable to believe that the applicant did not receive his 20-year letter until his unit administrator tracked it down in April 2001, one year after AR-PERSCOM mailed it. Due to budget cuts, AR-PERSCOM now uses First Class mail, rather than registered or certified mail, to mail these letters. While the U. S. Postal Service is usually highly efficient, a very small percentage of mail still gets “lost.”
2. The applicant was expecting his 20-year letter in the spring of 2000 and took steps reasonably soon after that period to track down his letter. He finally received it in April 2001 and on 31 May 2001 he completed the DD Form 1883.
3. The law requires an RCSBP election to be made within 90 days of receiving the 20-year letter. The Board concludes that the applicant met this requirement. However, to avoid any problems, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he completed the DD Form 1883 on 31 May 2000 and that it was received and processed by the proper offices in a timely manner.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant completed his DD Form 1883 on 31 May 2000 and that it was received and processed by the proper offices in a timely manner.
BOARD VOTE:
__jhk___ __tl____ __pm____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
John H. Kern
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001056826 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010823 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055602C070420
The FSM’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 25 March 1999. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion it is concluded: The FSM received his 20-year letter.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073900C070403
The applicant states through counsel, in effect, that the FSM did complete and forward his DD Form 1883 early in 1987 but it was lost either by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (now the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM)) or the U. S. Postal Service. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. That...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011539
f. An e-mail, dated 3 June 2013, from a Service Retirement Specialist, WIARNG, to the Chief, Retired Pay Branch, HRC, shows the Service Retirement Specialist confirmed the FSM did not receive his 20-year letter until 7 January 2001 and had made his RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt of the letter. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's record to show his RCSBP election was made and processed in a timely fashion after the issue date of this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064851C070421
The Board finds the applicant’s contention that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 reasonable. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 on 1 November 2000, electing to participate in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C, and returned the form to the appropriate office where it was received and processed in a timely manner. That the applicant be paid an RCSBP annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021766
Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the members 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant contends that the FSM's military records should be corrected to show she is eligible to receive an SBP annuity when the FSM...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060889C070421
By letter dated 21 October 1997, the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informed the applicant that, as the FSM did not make an RCSBP election within 90 days of the date of his 20-year letter, she would not receive an annuity if he died prior to age 60. When the FSM was placed on the TDRL in 1984 after undergoing surgery for lung cancer, he enrolled in the SBP. Considering the FSM’s previous action with regard to enrolling in the SBP, the Board agrees with the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084080C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069041C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019774
This letter stated: a. the 20-year letter and SBP election package had been sent to her by certified mail and was signed for by J____ H____; b. the certified receipt told the analyst working the FSM's case that she received the 20-year letter and the necessary information to complete the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate); c. the letter went on to say that if the information was in error, the FSM should call or fax AR-PERSCOM so that a copy of the FSM's 20-year letter and SBP booklet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082594C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: