| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member | |
| Mr. Joe R. Schroeder | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
APPLICANT STATES: That between August and September 1969, while serving in Vietnam, he was wounded by shrapnel.
The applicant provides no information concerning the circumstances surrounding his injury by shrapnel. He submits no sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, orders, corroborating statements from commanders, leaders, fellow comrades or health care personnel who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to this request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was ordered to active duty from the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 13 May 1968 at the rank of sergeant. He served in Vietnam from 22 April 1969 to 24 November 1969. On 12 December 1969, he was honorably released back to the ARNG.
His DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960, the Air Medal and the Expert Badge with M-60 Machine Gun bar. The Purple Heart is not listed as an authorized award.
In addition to the foregoing awards, his record reveals a certificate and order for the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in Vietnam during the period December 1968 to November 1969, and that he qualified sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle.
The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entry in item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).
On 26 November 1969, the applicant underwent a physical examination for the purpose of demobilization. In his own hand he indicated that his health was good and he made no entries concerning an injury caused by shrapnel or that he suffered any other wounds while he was on active duty.
On 1 December 1969, the applicant signed a Statement of Medical Condition in which he indicated there had been no change in his medical condition.
The National Personnel Records Center researched unit morning reports to verify the applicant’s claim for the Purple Heart. No evidence to support his request was found.
AR 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. Neither is there any evidence that a unit or hospital commander may have awarded him the Purple Heart.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that satisfies this requirement.
3. Nonetheless, in reviewing his case it was noted that he is entitled to the Army Commendation Medal, the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Sharpshooter Badge with rifle bar. Accordingly, the Army Review Board Agency Support Division, St. Louis will be requested to issued him a correction to his separation document reflecting these awards.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
NOTE: The Army Review Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis will be requested to provide the applicant with a correction to his separation document which shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Sharpshooter Badge with rifle bar.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____wtm_ ___reb__ ____jrs__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056812 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010814 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078238C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s service medical records are not available.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040004929C070208
His DD Form 214 shows award of the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 device, and the Good Conduct Medal. Although there is no medical evidence to show that the applicant’s wounds were the result of hostile action, records do show that he was evacuated to Japan and thence to the United States because of his wounds, and medical records do show that he sustained shrapnel wounds to his back and legs. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074136C070403
The same regulation provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 June 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995, and from 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due wounds resulting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073883C070403
The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the Purple Heart for an injury he received in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-200 provides, in pertinent part, that Item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 will contain a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment, received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization. The evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to the Purple Heart by virtue of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076889C070215
There is no evidence in existing service medical documents, personnel service records, or casualty or unit files, which confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam. The Board does note, however, that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 1 September 1969. The Board also notes that the "V" device was omitted from the Army Commendation Medal recorded on the applicant's separation document and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072951C070403
Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Furthermore, in consideration of the fact that his Vietnam tour was abbreviated because of wounds from hostile action and considering his period of service in Vietnam, he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069333C070402
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart and that he served in Vietnam for more than one year. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records, which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. While the Board has no reason to doubt the applicant’s statement that he was in fact wounded and awarded the Purple Heart, documentary evidence is required to correct a military record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071025C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant was wounded under qualifying conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080857C070215
Additionally, his DA Form 20, Enlisted Personnel Record, does not reflect award of the Purple Heart, nor does it show that he was wounded in action. His DD Form 214 should show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars (one for each campaign). That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Air Medal with first oak leaf cluster, the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010264
The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a copy of his military medical record, dated 18 March 1969, depicting shrapnel wound to his left hand, in support of his request. Therefore, this evidence is insufficient to approve award of the Purple Heart and correct his records to show this award. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to...