| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the U. S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Report of Investigation concerning her alleged fraud be deleted or destroyed.
APPLICANT STATES: That the information was unfounded. She was not formally charged. She was not found guilty of any charges. She provides no supporting evidence.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 September 1990.
On 23 February 1996, an unidentified individual reported to the CID that the applicant had “received unauthorized government quarters, was receiving unauthorized government quarters, and had altered a divorce decree.” The case was investigated and closed on 30 July 1996 titling her with forgery and false official statement.
On 11 January 1997, the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b (voluntary separation of a soldier denied reenlistment due to a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment). The bar to reenlistment is not available.
Army Regulation 195-2 prescribes Department of the Army policy on criminal investigation activities and constitutes the basic authority for the conduct of investigations and the collection, retention and dissemination of criminal information. In pertinent part, it states that requests to amend CID Reports of Investigation will be granted only if the requestor submits new, relevant, and material facts which would warrant such a revision. The burden of proof to substantiate the request is upon the individual. Requests to delete a person’s name from the title block will be granted only if it is determined that probable cause did not exist to believe that the person so titled committed the offense. The regulation further states that the decision to title a person for an offense is an investigative determination independent of any judicial, nonjudicial or administrative action taken against the individual or the results of such action.
The titling lasts for 40 years.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. In accordance with pertinent regulations, the decision by the CID to title a person for an offense is an investigative determination independent of any judicial, nonjudicial or administrative action taken against the individual, or the results of such action. If at the time of the investigation of an alleged offense credible information existed to believe that a person may have committed an offense, the CID is justified in titling that individual. The applicant has provided no evidence to show that the CID’s initial decision to title her was in error.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rjw___ __kwl___ __pm____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056761 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010920 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 134.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015289
The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) imposed on 15 December 1988 be corrected to show she used marijuana instead of cocaine. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant provided a CID Report of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009197
Counsel requests removal of the applicant's name from the title block of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Report of Investigation (ROI) 062-06-CID-25-70XXX, dated 27 September 2006, and reflecting the allegations of sexual harassment and indecent assault as "not founded." On 22 July 2008, a memorandum for record was received from the U.S. Army Criminal Records Center stating that after a review by higher headquarters, credible information existed to index the applicant as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014461
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of his name from the title block of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Report of Investigation (ROI) 08-CID446-XXXX4-6EX, dated 8 October 2008. Identifying information about the subject of a criminal investigation shall be removed from the title block of an ROI and the DCII if it is later determined a mistake was made at the time the titling and/or indexing occurred in that credible...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057607C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. By submitting the request for discharge, she acknowledged that she understood the elements of the offenses charged and was guilty of one or more of the charges against her or of lesser included offenses therein contained which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005257C070208
Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that all charges be removed from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI's) records (in effect, that information concerning the charges be removed from the records maintained by the U. S. Army Criminal Investigation Command's (CID's) Crime Records Center. Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the procedures under which the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007755
He was never charged with any crime and all flags on his record were removed upon a determination from a physician that the child in question had not been raped. Thus, when taken in its totality, the incongruence between the alleged dates and his deployment dates, the fact that the applicant had just divorced his first wife and she was not receiving benefits as a result of her own infidelity, and most obviously, the medical report indicating that no crime had taken place, all indicate that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018733
Counsel provided an email from Ms. AS, dated 16 November 2009, wherein Ms. AS stated: * she would be substantiating the case against the applicant for sexually abusing his stepdaughter * she had made several attempts to contact the applicant's attorney to set up a meeting to talk with the applicant, but no meeting had occurred * OCS was requesting the applicant complete a sex offender assessment before he be permitted to have any unsupervised contact with his children * the applicant could...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011408
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 5505.7, 14 May 1992, Titling and Indexing of Subjects of Criminal Investigations in the Department of Defense, states that titling ensures investigators can retrieve information in an ROI of suspected criminal activity at some future time for law enforcement and security purposes. Although the applicant contends that he was never detained for the accident, evidence of record shows he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009324C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army change the "code" it provided to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to delete the reference to distribution of a controlled substance. Although the Article 15 referred to by the applicant is not available, records at the CID's CRC reveal that she was the subject in a CID ROI for wrongful use and possession of cocaine. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03090637C070212
The applicant requests that a Report of Investigation (ROI) 02-CID538-31514-7- -, be removed from any existing personnel record being maintained by Department of the Army in a system of records. In response to his request, the Criminal Investigation Command on 3 January 2003 provided the applicant a copy of the redacted 19 August 2002 CID report of investigation. Much of the relevant evidence in this case is contained in the CID report of investigation showing that on 29 January 2002, the...