Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056648C070420
Original file (2001056648C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056648

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be paid an enlistment bonus.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that when he reenlisted on 12 February 2000, he was informed that he would receive a bonus of $2,500.00. Later, he was informed that he did not qualify for the bonus because he had too many years of service. He believes that the government should have known his total number of years of service. Since they did not and made an error he is entitled to the bonus. If he is unable to receive the bonus he will seek to have his contract voided.

In support of his request, he submits a letter from the USA Recruiting Command (USAREC), and a copy of his enlistment forms. The letter indicates that USAREC conducted an inquiry into the applicant’s allegations. They determined that an error was made at the time of the applicant’s enlistment into the USAR. His enlistment contract did reflect that he was authorized a cash bonus, when in fact, at the time of his enlistment, he did not qualify for a bonus due to his time in service. The applicant’s options were accept the contract “as is” without the benefit of the enlistment option in question, or he could choose to submit an exception to policy for the cash bonus to be applied in good faith, or he could apply to this Board.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the USAR on 19 July 1978, entered the Regular Army on 14 June 1979 and was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group on 12 June 1982. He then transferred from the USAR Control Group to an USAR unit on 28 June 1982; he immediately reenlisted in an USAR unit on 13 July 1984 and immediately reenlisted for an USAR unit on 6 May 1990. He then transferred to the USAR Control Group at his own requests on 1 November 1994 and was subsequently discharged on 7 May 1996. He reenlisted in the USAR on 12 February 2000 and is currently in an USAR unit.

A DARP Form 249, Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 30 July 1988, reflects that the applicant was credited with 8 years of qualifying service. The applicant certified that the statement was correct.

On 6 May 1990, the applicant reenlisted in the USAR for a period of six years. The enlistment form shows that on the day of enlistment the applicant had





2 years, 11 months, and 29 days total active military service and 8 years, 11 months, and 14 days total inactive military service. A combined total service period of 11 years, 11 months, and 13 days.

A DARP Form 249 dated 8 December 1990 reflects the applicant was credited with 12 years total qualifying service.

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects that the applicant entered onto active duty in support of Desert Shield/Desert Storm. He was on active duty for the period 20 September 1990 to 29 May 1991. The applicant was credited with 8 months and 10 days net active service this period; with 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days total prior active service; and with 9 years, 2 months, and 3 days total prior inactive service. A combined total service of 12 years, 10 months and 12 days.

On 12 February 2000, after a break in service, he enlisted at the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Military Entrance Processing Station. He enlisted into the USAR for a period of six years. He indicated by his initials that he had less than 10 years total military service and was enlisting for a bonus of $2,500.00.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant began his military affiliation with the USAR in 1978. He then served continuously in the Regular Army and the USAR until 1994 – a service period of 16 years. Throughout his career he received several official documents to include a Chronological Statement of Retirement Points and a DD Form 214, which informed him he had more than 10 years of service prior to his 12 February 2000 enlistment. The applicant indicated by his initial on the enlistment document that he had less than 10 years of service, which made him eligible for the bonus. He has provided no reasonable explanation as to why, when he enlisted on 12 February 2000, he believed that he had less than 10 years of service. Later, when his service period was verified, he was informed he was not eligible for the bonus. The Board concludes that it was action by the applicant himself that led to his enlistment for a bonus for which he was not eligible. The Board does not believe that an error or injustice exists in his case and, therefore, must conclude that the actions taken by the Army were proper.







2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mkp___ ___kak __ ____rtd _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056648
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011002
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 112.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008599C070208

    Original file (20040008599C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    An enlisted Reserve member in an active status who served at least 18 years but less than 20 years may not be discharged from a Reserve component until the member reaches 20 years of service and qualifies for retirement. He had earned 13 of those qualifying years between the retirement years beginning with his enlistment in the USAR on 24 July 1975 and his discharge during RYE 23 July 1990. Had the ending year for the applicant's first year of service been correctly computed based upon the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013773

    Original file (20070013773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests he be paid the full amount of his prior service enlistment bonus (PSEB) of $5,000.00 and student loan repayment program (SLRP) incentive of $10,000.00 for his enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). Evidence of record shows that on 28 June 2002 the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a 6-year term of service for a $5,000.00 PSEB and a $10,000.00 SLRP incentive. Notwithstanding the fact the advisory opinion recommended the applicant be paid the full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004584

    Original file (20070004584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states, in effect, that his enlistment contract shows "ACF - $40,000", not "ACF & MGIB - $40,000." The applicant's service records contain a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), Annex D, dated 28 June 2000. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $40,000.00 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020049

    Original file (20140020049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he terminated his service with the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) because his new first sergeant was out to replace him with a friend. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A qualifying year is determined to be a year in which a minimum of 50 retirement points have been credited for a Reserve member.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018448

    Original file (20090018448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that if his 135 active duty points were not "stacked" in the RYE 8 January 1983, he would have more than enough qualifying years for retirement pay. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show an administrative error in the assignment of these active duty points. The applicant had 18 years of qualifying service when he was transferred to the Retired Reserve by reason of having reached the maximum allowable age.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022093

    Original file (20120022093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was retained in service under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1176(b) (10 USC 1176(b)) and allowed to complete 20 years of Reserve service qualifying for retired pay. The applicant provides: * self-authored statement * Enlisted Qualitative Retention Board letter * Order 43-07 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge) * Department of the Army Reserve Personnel (DARP) Form 249-3 (Chronological Record of Military Service) * Point...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000204

    Original file (20120000204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records to show he completed 20 years of qualifying service for Reserve retired pay. The applicant provides: * FSM's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * FSM's request for discharge, dated 16 February 1970 * FSM's USAR discharge orders, dated 1 March 1970 * FSM's Department of the Army Reserve Personnel (DARP) Form 249-3 (Chronological Record of Military Service), dated 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006143C070205

    Original file (20060006143C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of DAPC Form 249 (Request for Correction of Chronological Statement of Retirement Points for USAR Troop Program Members), dated 1 August 1989. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed 14 years of qualifying service. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant is not eligible to reenlist in the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087020C070212

    Original file (2003087020C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows several other enlistment documents have the enlistment bonus amount changed from $20,000 to $2,000. It also states that MEPS personnel annotated his enlistment contract with a $20,000 cash bonus instead of the correct amount of $2,000. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION : The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003741C071029

    Original file (20070003741C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be provided the $2,500.00 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) he was promised in conjunction with his three year enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) of 16 February 1999. Further, the USAR PSEB Addendum completed on the applicant during his processing for his 16 February 1999 enlistment in the USAR specifically outlined the eligibility criteria for receipt of the bonus in...