Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056632C070420
Original file (2001056632C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 21 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056632

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. James E. Vick Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. William D. Barr Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her uncharacterized discharge be changed to a medical discharge under honorable conditions.

APPLICANT STATES: That her principal problem in basic training was inadequate medical care. The fifth physician she saw identified her stress fracture. This and her family problems caused her to seek someone with whom she could discuss her anxiety. That was then used to support her discharge.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: That the applicant’s submission, in conjunction with the official Army records, amply advance the applicant’s contentions and substantially reflect the probative facts needed for equitable review.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

She enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 August 2000. On 25 August 2000, she was assigned to the Fitness Training Company, Fort Jackson, SC.

On 14 September 2000, the applicant was counseled for indicating she had a depressed and unmotivated state of mind and for showing by verbal and expressive language that she had trouble coping with the military. She was informed that she was being recommended for evaluation by Community Mental Health Services. An appointment for 15 September 2000 was made.

On 15 September 2000, the applicant received a mental status evaluation. She was found to have the mental capacity to understand and participate in proceedings and to be mentally responsible. She apparently indicated to the mental health specialist that she was having many family problems which were causing her to have a lack of concentration and motivation. She apparently indicated that she had a past history of being abused both mentally and physically and that the training environment and the way she and her peers were treated brought back memories of her abuse. She was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. It was recommended that her unit consider an administrative discharge based upon the findings.

On 26 September 2000, the applicant was counseled concerning her physical fitness test assessment. (She passed the push-up and sit-up requirements but could not run one mile in the required 10 minutes and 30 seconds after 10 tries.)

Apparently, the applicant was given her first temporary profile for ankle pain on 26 September 2000. It was renewed on 29 September and 6 October 2000.

On 10 October 2000, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action on her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 for entry-level status performance and conduct; specifically, for adjustment disorder and repeated Army Physical Fitness Test failure. The applicant was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action. She waived her right to counsel and did not submit statements in her own behalf. The appropriate commander approved the applicant’s discharge.

On 19 October 2000, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for entry-level performance and conduct. Her character of service was described as uncharacterized. She had completed 2 months and 2 days of creditable active service.

Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members who were voluntarily enlisted in the Regular Army, National Guard or Army Reserve, are in an entry level status and, before the date of the initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of creditable continuous service, and have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention. The following conditions are illustrations of conduct that does not qualify for retention: cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life; cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline; or have demonstrated character and behavior characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service. Unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a soldier will be awarded an uncharacterized description of service if in an entry-level status. (For Regular Army soldiers, entry level status is the first 180 days of continuous active duty.)

Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment, retention, and separation. Stress fractures are not listed as a cause for referral to a medical evaluation board.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. There is no evidence to show that the applicant’s statement to the mental health specialist that she was having many family problems which caused her to have a lack of concentration and motivation was coerced or misstated. Lack of motivation is one of the reasons for a chapter 11 discharge. In addition, stress fractures are not a cause for referral to a medical evaluation board and so she was not eligible for a medical separation. She was discharged under the proper authority and the uncharacterized description of service was properly given.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jev___ __bje___ __wdb___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056632
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010821
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017427

    Original file (20080017427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his uncharacterized discharge to a medical discharge. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a reason for separation of entry-level performance and conduct and an uncharacterized characterization of service. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013591

    Original file (20140013591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4856-R, dated 14 February 1984, shows the applicant was again counseled by her NCOIC regarding her request for discharge under the TDP. On 23 February 1984, action was initiated to release her from active duty by reason of entry-level status and conduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11. Her company commander stated the specific reasons for the proposed action as: * she could not or would not adapt socially or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099127C070212

    Original file (03099127C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her report of medical examination completed prior to her enlistment shows that she was medically fit with a physical profile serial of 1 1 1 1 1 1. A medical report indicates that the applicant was seen on 20 December 2000 because of headache and lower back pain. It provides for medical evaluation boards, which are convened to document a Soldier’s medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the Soldier’s status.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01517

    Original file (PD2012 01517.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutySGT/E-5(91E/Dental Assistant),medically separated for major depressive disorder (MDD), recurrent, compounded by alcohol dependence, with history of depressed mood and anxiety.The CI first presented to military mental health in the late 80’s and noted first being treated for alcoholism in Germany in 1997 for both narcotic addiction and polydrug dependence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006941

    Original file (20130006941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 3 states a separation will be described as entry level with uncharacterized service if the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service at the time separation action was initiated. The evidence of record shows the applicant's separation action was initiated due to her inability to physically adapt to military service as evidenced by her repeated temporary profiles for stress fractures and her desire to be released from active duty. As she was separated prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010024C070208

    Original file (20040010024C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 17 August 1999 memorandum from the Medical Department Activity indicates that because of her medical condition, left hip stress fracture, she was unable to perform her normal military duties from 16 August 1999 to 23 August 1999 in accordance with the provisions of her profile. A Soldier may be discharged or retired because of medical reasons, e.g., medically unfit for retention, as in the applicant’s case; however, the character of service, honorable, under honorable conditions, etc., is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014024

    Original file (20100014024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 5 January 2009, shows the applicant was counseled by her company commander for her inability to adapt to the military environment due to constantly being "on code" since arriving to basic combat training (BCT). The evidence shows the applicant's commander recommended her separation based on her refusal to complete training. Her records do not show she was suffering from any medically unfitting condition that would have required her to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003974

    Original file (AR20130003974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to general under honorable conditions and a change to the narrative reason for separation to medical. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606018C070209

    Original file (9606018C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s commanding officer initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, for a personality disorder. On 1 March 1995 the separation authority (Commander of the Medical Activity (MEDDAC) at Fort McClellan), directed that the applicant be discharged and that she receive an entry level separation (uncharacterized). The applicant was approved for separation on two occasions, once on 1 March 1995 as a result of the findings and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021489

    Original file (AR20100021489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of ability, lack of self discipline, lack of motivation, and repeatedly failed the Army Physical Fitness Test, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 24 November 2004, the separation authority waived further...