Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056503C070420
Original file (2001056503C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 28 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056503

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be reinstated in the Army Reserve and have another opportunity to be considered for promotion to Major.

APPLICANT STATES: That he had a personal family crisis that prevented him from attending Phase II of the Officer Advanced Course (OAC). In support of his application he submits a copy of his last officer evaluation report (OER).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show he was commissioned as second lieutenant in the USAR on 17 May 1986.

He was promotion to the rank of captain/0-3 on 12 March 1993.

Informal coordination with the staff of the Promotions and Notifications Branch, Officer of Reserve Components Promotions, revealed that the applicant was considered, but was not selected, for promotion to major by the 2 March 1999 Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) because he did not meet military education requirements. The applicant was subsequently considered for promotion to major by the 7 March 2000 RCSB, but was not selected again because he did not meet military education requirements.

The applicant’s records show that he had not met the military educational requirements prior to the convening dates of the RCSB’s.

On 2 January 2001, the applicant was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175, due to his failure to be selected for promotion after second consideration.

Army Regulation 135-175 provides policy, criteria, and procedures governing the separation of officers of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and the United States Army Reserve (USAR), except for officers serving on active duty or active duty training exceeding 90 days. Paragraph 4-4 pertains to the removal from an active status. It states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after second consideration by a DA Reserve Components selection board.










Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers. The regulation provides that mandatory selection boards will be convened each year to consider Army Reserve officers in an active status for promotion to captain through lieutenant colonel. The regulation provides that in order to be qualified for promotion to major an individual must have completed
Combined Arms Services Staff School (CAS3), 7 years of time in grade (TIG) as a captain, and an officer advanced course (OAC) on or before the convening date of the respective promotion board; and that upon a nonselection by a promotion board an individual’s promotion eligibility date (PED) will be adjusted by 1 year, accordingly; and that the individual will receive mandatory promotion consideration prior to their PED’s so that, if selected, they may be promoted on their future PED.

In pertinent part, Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who twice fails to be selected for promotion to captain, major, or lieutenant colonel will not again be considered for promotion and will be removed from an active status.

Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details and Transfers) covers subject policy and procedures and, in pertinent part, provides detailed procedures regarding removal of Army Reserve members from an active status. Paragraph 7-4 requires removal of officers who are twice not selected for promotion to chief warrant officer three, chief warrant officer four, captain, major,
or lieutenant colonel.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes that the applicant was properly considered for promotion by the 1999 and 2000 RCSB’s based on his promotion eligibility date (PED) of
12 March 2000. The Board also notes that he was not selected for promotion by the 1999 and 2000 RCSB’s and that he was subsequently discharged based on his nonselections. The Board further notes that, as a captain, he is required to complete the OAC prior to the convening date of the RCSB’s.

2. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence,
to show that his family crisis prevented him from attending the OAC prior to the convening dates of the RCSB’s. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to reinstatement to the Army Reserve or promotion reconsideration to major.





3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__js___ __dh____ ___rd_____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056503
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010828
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 20010102
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 135-155//175
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 192
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063243C070421

    Original file (2001063243C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Removal of his discharge and second passover for promotion. In pertinent part, Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who twice fails to be selected for promotion to captain, major, or lieutenant colonel will not again be considered for promotion and will be removed from an active status. The Board notes that applicant’s contention that he was not notified of his first passover that would have allowed him to correct his non-promotable status; however,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003080111C070212

    Original file (2003080111C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, waiver of his military education requirement for promotion to major and appearance before a Special Selection Board (SSB). The evidence of record shows the applicant completed all requirements for his baccalaureate degree four months prior to the March 2001 RCSB; however, Excelsior University failed to confer the applicant's degree prior to the convening date of the March 2001 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070399C070402

    Original file (2002070399C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to major by the 1995 RCSB, which convened on 14 March 1995. The commander stated that the applicant was a member of the IRR, was selected for promotion to major with a PED of 20 August 1994, in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155, and should have received his promotion orders within 30 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062470C070421

    Original file (2001062470C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In pertinent part, Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who twice fails to be selected for promotion to captain, major, or lieutenant colonel will not again be considered for promotion and will be removed from an active status. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: The contention that a copy of his Master of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059451C070421

    Original file (2001059451C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The regulation provides that in order to be qualified for promotion to lieutenant colonel an individual must have completed 50 percent of the CGSC, 7 years of time in grade (TIG) as a major, and an officer advanced course (OAC) on or before the convening date of the respective promotion board. The Board further notes that, as a major, he was required to complete 50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097212C070212

    Original file (03097212C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The TADLP Enrollment History, provided by the applicant, indicates that in July 2003, just prior to receiving notification that he had been considered and not selected for promotion to major a second time, the applicant enrolled in the Reserve Component Transportation Officer Advanced Course Phase I. All 12 courses associated with that OAC were issued to the applicant on 10 July 2003 and by 29 September 2003 the applicant had completed all of the course requirements. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013113C070206

    Original file (20050013113C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ARPERSCOM, St. Louis, issued the applicant a promotion memorandum, dated 24 November 1999, announcing his promotion to captain with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 30 October 1999, the date after withdrawal of his Federal recognition and his transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 29 October 1999. The applicant also stated that he was in the ARNG when promoted to captain on 29 October 1999. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064650C070421

    Original file (2001064650C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge be changed to Retired Reserve and reinstatement of his VSI (Voluntary Separation Incentive) payments. Title 10, USC, section 14513, states that a Reserve officer of the Army, who is in an active status and whose removal from an active status or from a Reserve active-status list is required by section 14506 of this title shall: 1) be transferred to an inactive status if the Secretary concerned determines that the officer has skills which may be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074228C070403

    Original file (2002074228C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his records to show that he was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC/0-5) with the appropriate date of rank (DOR) prior to his retirement with back pay and allowances. The regulation provides that mandatory selection boards will be convened each year to consider Reserve Component officers in an active status for promotion to captain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091205C070212

    Original file (2003091205C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to major under the criteria 1998 through 2000 by a United States Army Reserve (USAR) promotion board and promotion to major in the USAR. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, verified the applicant is currently still in an active duty status and has been considered and selected for promotion to major by a active duty promotion board. The regulation further specifies that an officer who has an established date for removal...