| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be medically retired or discharged. He states, in effect, that he should have been medically discharged because his tuberculosis was aggravated by his military service and determined to have occurred “in the line of duty.” He submits no evidence in support of his request.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted in the Army National Guard in 1950 and on 5 August 1952 enlisted in the Regular Army. He served nearly 15 months overseas where he was awarded the Korean Service Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge.
In the processing of this application, an advisory opinion was provided by the Board’s Medical Advisor. He noted in his advisory opinion that the applicant was hospitalized in March 1954 due to a “productive cough and fever.” The opinion noted that the applicant underwent “an extensive exam to rule out tuberculosis” and that all of his “sputum test were negative for active tuberculosis….” The Medical Advisor stated that documents available to the Board indicated that the applicant’s 1954 chest x-ray was “identical to his [the applicant’s] pre-induction
x-ray of 1950” and that medical authorities ruled that the applicant’s tuberculosis had existed prior to his entry in service and was not “in line of duty.” The Board’s Medical Advisor concluded that the applicant’s condition was not service aggravated, that it therefore did not qualify for service connected disability, and that because his tuberculosis was inactive he was fit to remain on active duty. The applicant was provided an opportunity to comment on the advisory opinion but did not respond.
The applicant’s June 1954 separation physical examination notes that the applicant was “qualified for general service” and confirms that his tuberculosis was determined to be “line of duty no.”
On 25 June 1954 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-365 and issued a general discharge.
Army Regulation 615-365, then in effect, provides for the discharge of enlisted personnel for the convenience of the government. Among other reasons, it provided for the separation of enlisted soldiers with a physical or mental defect or disability who elected discharge for the convenience of the government when it had been established by proper medical authority that the defect or disability existed prior to entrance on active duty or was not aggravated while on active duty.
Army Regulation 635-40 states that disability compensation is not an entitlement. It is provided to soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. When a solider is being processed for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement, creates a presumption that the soldier is fit. The presumption of fitness may be overcome if the evidence establishes that the soldier was, in fact, physically unable to perform adequately the duties of his or her office, grade, rank or rating for a period of time because of disability. There must be a causative relationship between the less than adequate duty performance and the unfitting medical condition or conditions. The presumption of fitness may also be overcome by an acute, grave illness or injury or other significant deterioration of the soldier’s physical condition occurring immediately prior to, or coincident with processing for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability and which rendered the soldier unfit for further duty.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
There is no evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, which confirms that he was unable to perform his military duties at the time of his discharge or that his medical condition was aggravated by his military service. As such there is no basis for disability retirement or separation.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 25 June 1954, the date the applicant was discharged and authenticated his separation document. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
25 June 1957.
The application is dated 16 April 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__WTM__ __AAO__ __CLG __ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056489 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011101 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 142.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709510C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709510
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. In 1962 the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board to grant him a medical discharge stating that he had been under the care of a psychiatrist at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511257C070209
APPLICANT STATES: He was rated for classic migraine headaches. If an EPTS condition is not aggravated by military service, the finding will be not in line of duty, EPTS. If the PEB determines that an individual is physically unfit, it recommends the percentage of disability to be awarded which, in turn, determines whether an individual will be discharged with severance pay or retired.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008379
The applicant requests, in effect, that his non-regular retirement be changed to a retirement due to permanent physical disability. The applicant essentially states that there is no documentation to show that he should have been retired due to permanent physical disability at the time of his retirement from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states, in pertinent part, that disability compensation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01157
On 18 May 2011, NGB/A1PS found the applicant medically disqualified for worldwide duty for sleep apnea and requested a fitness evaluation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPA recommends denial of the applicants request for a medical retirement. Furthermore, the applicant was diagnosed with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome in 2010 by the DVA but there is no documentation to support any service connected aggravation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059202C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002462C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, disability retirement or separation. The applicant states he was medically qualified to enter the Army and after a period of time, which included basic and advanced individual training, he was determined to be physically disqualified, it was concluded that his medical condition was not aggravated by his military service and he was subsequently discharged. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant underwent a physical examination on 4 December...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003434
The memorandum indicated the applicant does not meet medical retention standards of Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-39(h) and he has also reached his maximum years of service and should be retired from the service. Most of the applicant's medical records are not available for review with this case. An NDR PEB is a non-line of duty PEB that reviews the Soldier's condition solely for a determination of fitness for continued service in the RC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009915
The VA Rating Decision provided by the applicant with his application shows that he was granted 0% service-connected disability for all of his conditions. Army Regulation 635-40 states disability compensation is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and who can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. There is no evidence to show he had other conditions that rendered him unfit to perform his duties.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011445
The applicant states, in effect, he was told during his retirement physical his medical records and his physical would be forwarded to (STL-MRB) for medical disability determination. On 31 May 1997, the applicant was retired. The applicant states, in effect, he was told during his retirement physical his medical records and the results of his physical would be forwarded to STL-MRB for medical disability determination.