Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056352C070420
Original file (2001056352C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 7 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056352

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) debt be cancelled.

APPLICANT STATES: That financial and personal problems hindered her performance of duties. She became pregnant because of a terrible and unfortunate circumstance. She requested a leave of absence due to hardship and it was granted. In the spring of 1994, due to an economic hardship as well as a medical restriction, she was forced to withdraw from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Because of these mitigating circumstances, she thought that she was relieved of her debt. She is presently a single parent of two children and trying to get her life back on track. Supporting evidence is as listed on the enclosure to the DD Form 149.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's ROTC contract and disenrollment paperwork is not available. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The applicant apparently signed an ROTC scholarship contract in 1992. She apparently requested leave from the program in 1994 and on an unknown date was disenrolled from the program.

Both the July 1989 and the July 1992 versions of the Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract, DA Form 597-3,
state that the cadet understood and agreed that if he or she, for any reason, failed to complete the educational requirements contained in the contract, he or she will have breached the contract. The cadet further understood that, as a consequence, he or she could be ordered to active duty or required to reimburse the United States an amount of money, plus interest, that was equal to the total cost of the financial assistance provided by the United States.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s ROTC records are not available. However, the Board notes that either of the two Cadet Contracts which the applicant would have signed provided that if she failed to complete the educational requirements contained in the contract she could be required to reimburse the Government the total cost of the financial assistance provided by the Government.

2. In the absence of the applicant’s disenrollment paperwork showing that she was given any promises that reimbursement was not required, the Board has insufficient information on which to consider granting the relief requested based upon equity.

3. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mkp___ __tbr___ __rks___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056352
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010807
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098361C070212

    Original file (03098361C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) from her enlisted active duty service was available to the Board, only her Cadet Record Brief was available from her time as an ROTC cadet. The statement of support, submitted by the PMS at the University of Oklahoma stated that the applicant went through an extreme personal hardship while contracted as an Army ROTC scholarship cadet, and that following the death of her first brother in 1995 she “drove to Texas every weekend...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068705C070402

    Original file (2002068705C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Imbedded in her 10 page Army Senior Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract (DA Form 597-3), which the applicant authenticated, were provisions which stated that she understood that she could "not enlist in the Active Army, another military service, or in a military service academy while I am a contracted ROTC cadet unless I am properly released from my ROTC cadet status." The contract also stated that if the applicant were disenrolled from the ROTC program the "Secretary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010508C070208

    Original file (20040010508C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    That command stated that the applicant voluntarily breached the terms of her ROTC contract, and also voluntarily enlisted in the Army; however, her voluntary enlisted service in the Army was not an authorized remedy for debt repayment. If the applicant had chosen to enter active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty at the time she failed to continue her enrollment in the ROTC, she would have been assigned according to the needs of the Army and would not have had the opportunity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011795

    Original file (20140011795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 23 July 2008 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 4 February 2009 * Orders Number 034-01, issued by the Northeastern Pennsylvania Army ROTC, University of Scranton on 4 February 2009 * Cadet Command (CC) Form 203-R (Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty (GRFD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009854

    Original file (20070009854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides her ROTC contract, an addendum to her ROTC contract, her Regular Army enlistment contract and statement for enlistment dated 8 December 2006, and the following supporting documents with this application: a. a copy of the applicant's United States Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record dated 27 February 2006 showing the applicant's education debt totals $2,678.00; b. a 22 February 2006 letter from the ROTC Battalion Commander initiating disenrollment action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021219

    Original file (20120021219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states the applicant obtained a medical waiver for anxiety and depression to enroll in the ROTC Program. Counsel states the applicant was advised that she had two options for withdrawing from the ROTC Program, one was to voluntarily disenroll or request medical disenrollment and the second option was nonparticipation. Therefore, it would be appropriate to show she was disenrolled from the ROTC Program by reason of medical disqualification and canceling her ROTC debt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105270C070208

    Original file (2004105270C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his disenrollment board proceedings; an ROTC Cadet Command Form 131-R (Cadet Action Request); his notice of disenrollment; his appeal and Headquarters, U. S. Army Cadet Command's 13 February 2004 response; and a letter dated 14 April 2004 from Alabama Psychiatric Services, P.C. At that point, the Army was remiss by not recommending the applicant receive a medical examination by a military medical officer to determine if he was medically qualified to continue in ROTC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064274C070421

    Original file (2001064274C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant: But did you say that to me? She alleged fraudulent and deceptive recruitment practices by the Army; the PMS duped her, a “trusting young 17 year old girl with no preconceived notions of the Army” when he first pursued her; the PMS misrepresented and manipulated the entry requirements as evidenced by her failure to meet the weight requirements or pass the physical test prior to her signing the contract; the PMS led her to believe that weight and physical conditioning were not a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100137C070208

    Original file (2004100137C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 7d of the applicant's DA Form 597-3 would have stated, "Under other disenrollment criteria established now or in the future by Army regulations, incorporated herein by reference…the Secretary of the Army or his or her designee may order me to active duty as an enlisted soldier for a period of not more than four years or, in lieu of being ordered to active duty, may require me to reimburse the United States through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088147C070403

    Original file (2003088147C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that as part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, the applicant, on 9 November 1998, signed a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract), which is an agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. Paragraph 7d states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus...