| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg. | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded. He states, in effect, that both he and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have been told that he has a bad conduct discharge (BCD) and he is barred from benefits because of the BCD. He states that he does not know what a Chapter 10 is or how he got it. His counsel concurs with the applicant's presentation and requests that all reasonable doubt be resolved in the applicant's favor. The applicant indicates that the date of discovery of the alleged error or injustice was 21 November 1979. He offers no reason why it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to consider this application.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Oklahoma Army National Guard on 30 November 1977 and was ordered to active duty for training on 28 January 1978.
The applicant received non-judicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for being absent without leave (AWOL) period 7 February – 14 March 1978. On 12 December 1978 he was tried and convicted by special court-martial of being AWOL 15 March – 4 October 1978 and 7 – 9 October 1978. The sentence imposed by court-martial included 30 days confinement. The applicant again received NJP for a fourth period of AWOL 1 – 29 May 1979. The punishment included placement in a correctional custody facility for 30 days.
The applicant escaped from confinement on 1 July 1979 and was again AWOL until 2 September 1979.
On 15 October 1979 the Commander, 15th Battalion, 4th CST Brigade recommended the applicant be tried by a special court-martial with the power to adjudge a bad conduct discharge. He cited the applicant’s most recent AWOL period, his escape and his history of repeated periods of AWOL as justification. The applicant was advised of his rights, including his rights to counsel and to elect discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and he acknowledged these rights on 15 October 1979.
On 22 October 1979, charges were preferred and the applicant consulted with counsel. At that time he submitted a request, under Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, chapter 10 for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. He admitted that he was guilty of the charges preferred against him and/or to lesser included charges for which he could receive a punitive discharge. He acknowledged that he could receive an UOTHC discharge and this type of discharge would result in the loss of most or all Army and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.
The separation authority, a major general, approved the applicant’s request for administrative separation and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. On 21 November 1979 the applicant was separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10 with an UOTHC. He had served 10 months and 9 days and had 349 days lost time.
There is no evidence that the applicant requested review of his discharge within the 15-year statute of limitations for consideration by the ADRB.
The applicant has previously requested review of his records on the issue of entitlement to a medical discharge. The Board denied that request (AC94-0529) to correct his records on 26 July 1995.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 21 November 1979, the date discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 21 November 1982.
The application is dated 7 February 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__INW __ __FNE__ __GJW __ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056351 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010809 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006377
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record then shows the following: * absent without leave (AWOL) from Fort Jackson during the period 17 October 1978 through 27 November 1978 * returned to military control (RMC) at Fort Meade, MD on 28 November 1978 * transferred to the U.S. Army Personnel Control Facility (PCF), Fort Dix, NJ on 4 December 1978 * AWOL during the period 4 December 1978 through 17 March 1979 * RMC at Fort Dix on 18 March 1979 * AWOL during the period 5...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020675
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to an honorable discharge (HD) or discharge for medical reasons. The version of the regulation in effect at the time provided that an individual requesting discharge under chapter 10 would undergo a medical examination as prescribed in Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 10. c. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an HD is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021019
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 18 July 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed he receive a UOTHC discharge. His record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement that would have supported the issuance of an HD or a GD by the separation authority at the time of his discharge or that would support an upgrade to an HD or a GD at this time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008855
He was subsequently ordered to active duty training. On 22 June 1979, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. On 9 May 1983, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) considered the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011139
The applicant completed an AWOL interview statement on 22 February 1979 in which he stated the reason he went AWOL was because he had family problems that really needed to be solved. There is no indication in the record that the applicant ever petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004617
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Chapter 10 of that regulation provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Although an HD or GD is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017778
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. He was credited with completing 4 months and 26 days of active service and time lost from 13 November 1979 through 20 January 1980, 17 through 21 May 1980, and 23 May through 14 July 1980.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010801C080213
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He stated that if returned to duty he would again go AWOL. __Richard T. Dunbar___ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20070010801 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20071220 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UOTHC DATE OF DISCHARGE 19790509 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, ch 10 DISCHARGE REASON A70.00 BOARD DECISION DENY REVIEW AUTHORITY Ms. Mitrano ISSUES 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003325
BOARD DATE: 20 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003325 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 14 January 1980, the discharge authority approved the applicant's request for a chapter 10 discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103057C070208
The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 10 March 1975. On 8 March 1979, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an UOTHC discharge and the applicant was discharged accordingly. As a result, the time for him to file a request for correction of any error or injustice to this Board expired on 14 April 1990.