| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he would like the Board to consider his record of service prior to the incident that led to his discharge and his post-service conduct since his discharge in upgrading his discharge. In support of his application he submits documents from his current employer and course completion certificates showing his completion of job related courses.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted on 26 October 1976 for a period of 3 years, training as a combat engineer and assignment to Europe. He completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 4 March 1977. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 November 1978.
He was honorably discharged on 22 March 1979 for immediate reenlistment. On 23 March 1979 he reenlisted for a period of 4 years and payment of a selective reenlistment bonus.
On 29 February 1980 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 17 December to 22 December 1980. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, restriction and extra duty.
He completed his tour in Germany on 29 February 1980 and was transferred to Fort Stewart, Georgia on 31 March 1980.
On 9 July 1980 he went AWOL and remained absent until he was apprehended by civil authorities in Panama City, Florida on 22 July 1981. He was returned to military control at Fort Bragg, North Carolina on 4 August 1981 and charges were preferred against him.
After consulting with counsel on 5 August 1981, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He also elected to submit a statement in his own behalf in which he asserted that he should receive an honorable discharge because he had previously received an honorable discharge and because he had only one incident in which NJP had been imposed against him.
The unit commander interviewed the applicant and indicated that the applicant had stated that he went AWOL because he believed that he was constantly being lied to by the chain of command, that he was being placed on details that
soldiers of lower rank should be doing and because he was expected to wear spit-shined boots and clean fatigues while working on vehicles in the motor pool. He also stated that he would continue to go AWOL if he were not granted a discharge.
The appropriate authority approved his request for discharge on 31 August 1981 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 11 September 1981 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 1 year, 5 months and 6 days of his current enlistment and had 384 days of lost time due to AWOL.
A review of his records shows that he received six letters of appreciation/achievement throughout his service.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was then and currently is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. It appears that the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the seriousness of the charges against him and his otherwise undistinguished record of service.
4. The applicant’s contentions, supporting documents and overall record of service have been noted by the Board; however, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his extensive absence and the available facts of his case.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___tbr___ ___mkp _ ___rks __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056104 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/08/07 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UOTHC) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1981/09/11 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020458
The applicant states: a. On 18 June 1981, the applicant was discharged accordingly. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000849
In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable conditions. On 9 November 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010882
On 21 September 1981, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for two specifications of being AWOL from 2 March 1981 to 17 September 1981 and 4 September 1980 to 9 February 1981. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. __________x__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014457
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also stated that he would continue to go AWOL if he was not discharged. The appropriate authority approved his request for discharge on 21 December 1981 and directed the applicant be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015920
Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. On 24 July 1981, consistent with the chain of command recommendations, the separation authority approved his request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070796C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072759C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to either an honorable or medical discharge. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he should have been discharged by reason of medical disability because he was addicted to drugs and alcohol and was never offered any help for his illness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072119C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010257
The applicant states he did not know he could request an upgrade of his discharge. Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020037
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions. On 14 September 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu...