Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055863C070420
Original file (2001055863C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 7 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001055863


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3. The applicant states that he has just noticed that his report of separation (DD Form 214) does not indicate an award of the AGCM.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 24 July 1978 for a period of 3 years and training as a field artillery surveyor. He completed his training and was assigned to Fort Sill, Oklahoma until he was honorably released from active duty in the pay grade of E-4 on 23 July 1981, Due to the expiration of his term of service. He had served 3 years of total active service.

5. A review of the applicant’s records fails to show that he was ever awarded the AGCM. His records are also void of any derogatory information.

6. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, prescribed Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the AGCM. It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 24 July 1978 to 23 July 1981. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.

2. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the AGCM for the period of 24 July 1978 to 23 July 1981 and correcting his records accordingly.

BOARD VOTE:

___tbr __ ___mkp_ ___rks___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Margaret K. Patterson____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001055863
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2001/08/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102 107.0056/AGCM
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018311

    Original file (20100018311.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 1 August 1978 through 31 July 1981 be corrected by adding all awards he earned during the period. Therefore, absent evidence of a disqualification, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 1 August 1978 through 31 July 1981. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065599C070421

    Original file (2001065599C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5) prior to his separation from active duty. The evidence of record clearly establishes that prior to his separation on 22 May 1978, he was promoted to SGT/E-5, effective 1 April 1978, with a DOR of 26 March 1978. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was promoted to the rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090165C070212

    Original file (2003090165C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 31 July 1980 to 15 July 1983. a. by showing that the individual concerned was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 (SP4) on 1 February 1982, that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017971

    Original file (20110017971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Army Service Ribbon (ASR), and Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Therefore, he is not entitled to have his records corrected to show award of the ASR. Therefore, he is not entitled to have his records corrected to show award of the OSR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066012C070421

    Original file (2001066012C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that this military records be corrected to show all the awards and decorations to which he is entitled. The applicant states, in effect, that he was rushed out of the Army and that the separation document (DD Form 214), he was issued on the date of his separation did not include the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Army Service Ribbon (ASR). That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005893

    Original file (20110005893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065585C070421

    Original file (2001065585C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, prescribed Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). At the time of the applicant’s REFRAD, his records should have reflected his awards of the Purple Heart and the Air Medal. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 1 August 1966 to 17 May 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024608

    Original file (20110024608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record), section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty military service. During the Vietnam War, item 24c of the DD Form 214 in effect at that time showed the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed (e.g., USAREUR or USARV). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008229

    Original file (20110008229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s request for award for award of the AGCM, NPDR, and NUC was carefully considered. General orders awarded his unit the VUA during his period of service in Iraq. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (First Award), for the period 30 June 2003 through 31 December 2005; and b. adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214: * AGCM (First Award) * VUA * OSR 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002035

    Original file (20130002035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The award may be awarded retroactively to those...